Analysing for Authorship: A Guide to the Cusum TechniqueUniversity of Wales Press, 1996 - 324 sivua The need to attribute disputed utterance constantly arises, sometimes as a matter of legal urgency (contested 'confessions' or other documents), sometimes as the focus of fierce scholarly debate (was that new story just discovered really by D.H. Lawrence? QSUM finds not), sometimes as a popular diversion (whose words were on the 'Royal Tapes'?) It is in such situations that a scientific method of attribution - one which is objective - becomes desirable. |
Sisältö
Introduction | 3 |
The Method | 16 |
A Test Case for the Attribution of Authorship | 56 |
Tekijänoikeudet | |
10 muita osia ei näytetty
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
20 30 sequence Amhurst Andrew Morton anomalies average Back Road blip Canter Chapter Charles XII combined analysis combined sample Craftsman 612 criticism cumulative sum cusum analysis cusum charts cusum of sentence cusum technique D. H. Lawrence disputed texts EFL-speaker English essay evidence example Farringdon Forensic linguistics Frost King graph Hardcastle Helen Keller Henry Fielding Huxley initial vowel words initial words 0.0 insertion Joseph Andrews language length qsld Fig letter & initial letter words 0.0 linguistic literary long sentences method mixed utterance Muriel Spark Nicholas Amhurst number of words QSUM QSUM-chart reader result sample of utterance Sent sentence length chart sentence length qsld sentences Figure sentences qs23lw Figure sentences qs23lw+ivw Figure separation sequence of sentences shows solicitor statement statistical style stylometry thirty-four sentences three letters three-letter words twenty-five sentences twenty-two sentences utterance of Voice vowel words 0.0 weighted cusum words and words words starting writing written ΑΛΛ