The Concept of Utopia
Peter Lang, 2010 - 264 sivua
The meaning of the term utopia is rarely questioned, although it is used in widely differing ways. This classic text, first published in 1990, analyses the contested concept of utopia and examines how it has been used by commentators and social theorists. It is the only book to concentrate on the meaning of the term utopia, and to demonstrate the variety of ways in which it has been defined, in terms of content, form, and function. The author examines the use of utopia by Marx, Engels, Karl Mannheim, Robert Owen, Georges Sorel, Ernst Bloch, William Morris, and Herbert Marcuse. She defines utopia as the expression in texts and political practice of the desire for a better way of living and argues that utopian desire remains an active element in culture and politics.
"This book, central to the constitution of utopian studies as a field, argues for a structural pluralism in which, according to the social constructions of desire in specific historical periods, the three components of form, content, and function are combined in distinct and historically unique ways."
Professor Fredric Jameson, Department of Comparative Literature, Duke University
"Writing with clarity and grace, Levitas offers a sustained, intelligent, and critical examination of major definitions of utopia, addressing a range of recurring issues that trouble most attempts at definition. This is a strong and significant book, a far-ranging, insightful, and incisive exploration of the concept of utopia."
Professor Peter Stillman, Political Science Department, Vassar College
"Levitas, in her lucid and excellent book, supplies a state-of-the-art discussion of definitional debates in the field of utopian studies. The Concept of Utopia will be of extraordinary value to anyone who teaches utopian thought."
Dr Richard Gunn, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh
"As Levitas acknowledges, the publication date of the first edition of her classic work was inauspicious. Momentous changes were to usher in a near-consensus that we had reached the `end of history' and that capitalism was `the only game in town.' What place could be left for utopia? Twenty years later, how different things look. A neo-liberal capitalist juggernaut is out of control, threatening ecological disaster and offering only global inequalities, dislocations, and conflicts. To the re-emergent claim that `another world is possible' it can be added that another world is necessary. The republication of Levitas's classic work of recovery, analysis, and advocacy of utopia is entirely auspicious." Professor Ted Benton, Department of Sociology, University of Essex
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
abstract action activity actually alienation alternative approach argues argument aspect attempts become better Bloch central characteristic claim communism concept concerned concrete construction contains critical culture defined definition definition of utopia described desire discussion distinction dominant dream effect element Engels existing experience expression fact field function function of utopia future given goal groups historical hope human ibid ideal ideas identified ideology images important individual interest involves issue labour less limited literary London Mannheim Marcuse Marx Marxism material means Morris Morris's movement myth nature necessary needs objective opposition Owen particular political position possible potential practice present principle problem production progress question reality reason reference relationship remains repression role Saint-Simon satisfactions seen sense social socialist society Sorel studies suggests theory Thompson thought tion tradition transformation true University utopia writing