Weakness of Will in Renaissance and Reformation Thought
OUP Oxford, 30.6.2011 - 248 sivua
Weakness of will, the phenomenon of acting contrary to one's own better judgment, has remained a prominent discussion topic of philosophy. The history of this discussion in ancient, medieval, and modern times has been outlined in many studies. Weakness of Will in Renaissance and Reformation Thought is, however, the first book to cover the fascinating source materials on weakness of will between 1350 and 1650. In addition to considering the work of a broad range of Renaissance authors (including Petrarch, Donato Acciaiuoli, John Mair, and Francesco Piccolomini), Risto Saarinen explores the theologically coloured debates of the Reformation period, such as those provided by Martin Luther, Philip Melanchthon, John Calvin, and Lambert Daneau. He goes on to discuss the impact of these authors on prominent figures of early modernity, including Shakespeare, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. While most of the historical research on weakness of will has focused on the reception history of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Saarinen pays attention to the Platonic and Stoic discussions and their revival during the Renaissance and the Reformation. He also shows the ways in which Augustine's discussion of the divided will is intertwined with the Christian reception of ancient Greek ethics, and argues that the theological underpinnings of early modern authors do not rule out weakness of will, but transform the philosophical discussion and lead it towards new solutions.
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Acciaiuoli action theory akrasia akrateˆs akratic action akratic person appetitive powers Aquinas Aristotelian Aristotle Aristotle’s assent Augustine Augustine’s Augustinian autem Buridan Burley Calvin Camerarius Christian clear-eyed akrasia Clichtove cognitive commentary commonplace Platonism conclusion concupiscence conflict consent continence and incontinence contrary Daneau distinction Donato Acciaiuoli enim Ethices Christianae Ethicorum evil Explicatio exposition follows Francesco Giffen Golius habet harmful desires Heider Henry of Ghent human action ignorance incontinens incontinent person incontinentia inner intellectual intellectualist intemperate John Mair judgement knowledge Leibniz Luther Mair Medea medieval Melanchthon mind minor premise moral moribus Müller one’s particular passions peccatum perturbations Petrarch philosophical Piccolomini practical syllogism quae quam quia quod ratione reason and appetite regard remains Renaissance right reason Romans Saarinen scientia Secretum sense sensitive appetite sinful Socrates soul spirit Stoic Stoicism struggle between reason sunt syllogistic tamen theological Thomist tradition Usingen Versor virtue voluntarism voluntarist voluntary Wellendorffer wrestling Zwinger