Argument at Geneva: A Complete Collection of the Forensic Discussions on the Part of the United States and of Great Britain Before the Tribunal of Arbitration Under the Treaty of Washington
D. Appleton, 1889 - 653 sivua
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Argument at Geneva: A Complete Collection of the Forensic Discussions on the ...
Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2015
according actual Adams Alabama allowed American amount appears Appendix applied Arbitrators argument armed arrived authority base belligerent Bermuda Brit Britain British Government called Captain carry circumstances claims coal Confederate consideration considered Counsel Counter course crew cruise cruisers damages direct due diligence duty Enlistment equipment evidence Executive exercise fact fitted Florida force foreign further give given ground hostile included injuries intended interest jurisdiction law of nations letter Liverpool Lord loss Majesty's Government matter means ment months naval necessary neutral obligation observations offense officers operations opinion original owners parties persons ports prevent principles question reason received reference regard respect responsibility Rules Shenandoah ship statement supplies taken territory tion Treaty Tribunal United vessel violation
Sivu 182 - First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Sivu 147 - ... principles of international law which were in force at the time when the claims mentioned in Article I. arose; but that Her Majesty's Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries and of making satisfactory provision for the future, agrees that, in deciding the questions between the two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth...
Sivu 186 - Secondly, not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its ports or waters as the. base of naval operations against the other, or for the purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men. Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties.
Sivu 441 - And the High Contracting Parties agree to observe these rules as between themselves in future, and to bring them to the knowledge of other maritime Powers, and to invite them to accede to them.
Sivu 14 - Whereas differences have arisen between the Government of the United States and the Government of Her Britannic Majesty, and still exist, growing out of the acts committed by the several vessels which have given rise to the claims generically known as the "Alabama Claims...
Sivu 15 - Government, the high contracting parties agree that all the said claims, growing out of acts committed by the aforesaid vessels and generically known as the "Alabama claims...
Sivu 405 - ... and every such ship or vessel, with her tackle, apparel, and furniture, together with all materials, arms, ammunition and stores, which may have been procured for the building and equipment thereof, shall be forfeited, one half to the use of the informer, and the other half to the use of the United States.
Sivu 401 - ... any officer of the army, navy, or marines, being duly employed for the prevention of smuggling, and on full pay, or any officer of Customs or Excise, or any person acting in his aid or assistance, or duly employed for the prevention of smuggling, in the...
Sivu 267 - A neutral government is bound— First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a power with which it is at peace...