:

the further progress of such researches will be attended with new discoveries of the same nature.*

The great and important object of language is, to express the various wants and affections of those by whom it is spoken. In the earlier stages of civil society, man is contented with such comforts as are easily procured, and the operations of the human mind are circumscribed within narrow limits : his vocabulary is consequently scanty, though, at the same time, it may be fully adequate to every purpose to which it is applied. But as luxury and refinement advance in their gradual progress, the language of the community becomes more copious and elegant : it not only oversteps its ancient boundaries, but hastens to lay aside its ancient rudeness and barbarism. Material improvements cannot however be introduced by any sudden exertion ; they

Of the speculations of Joannes Elichmannus, a very learned physician, Salmasius has given an interesting account, which I do not remember to have seen quoted : “ Quod ad hoc ævi latuit plerosque eruditorum, ex eadem origine compererat fluxisse Germanicam et Persicam linguam, ad hanc illum conjecturam ducente infinita vocum copia, utrique linguæ communium, sed et verbis similiter terminatis, eodem modo compositis, aliisque multis argumentis. Quia porro multa quoque vocabula reperiuntur in Persica dialecto, quæ et Græca sunt, sed ita Græca, ut etiam non minus videantur esse Germanica, ex eo non vane augurabatur, pluria etiam Græcos de. buisse Scythicæ origini, quo ex fonte tam Persica quam Germanica profluxisset.” (Præfatio in Tabulam Cebetis Arabicam, sig. *3. Lugd. Bat. 1640, 4to.) The Scythian or Gothic origin of the Greek, has at a more recent period been ably illustrated by Dr. Jamieson, in a work entitled “ Hermes Scythicus, or the Radical Affinities of the Greek and Latin Languages to the Gothic.” Edinb. 1814, 8vo.

a

must be the result of that experience which a length of time only can bestow.

Before the elegancies of literature can claim any considerable share of attention, a spirit of general improvement must have begun to pervade the state ; and accordingly we find that vigour and originality of thought have always preceded beauty and accuracy of expression. In the first efforts of untutored genius, the harmony of periods is little regarded : such words as most readily occur to the recollection of the writer, are almost indiscriminately adopted ; and these are generally arranged without much attention to elegance or propriety.

Thus, if we take a retrospective view of English literature at no very remote period, we shall often find the beauty of the thought obscured by the meanness of the expression ; its pages are frequently deformed with uncouthness and vulgarity. Nor is it altogether untainted with these faults in its present state.

Propriety and beauty of style seem often to have been considered beneath the attention both of an author and a reader. The ancients however regarded this subject in a different point of view: to be skilled in their native tongue, was esteemed among the number of the politest accomplishments. Julius Cæsar, who was not only a great warrior, but also a man of fashion, was desirous of adding this accomplishment to his other shining qualities; and we are informed that he studied the language of his own country with much application, as we are sure he possessed it in the highest degree of purity and elegance. The literary world cannot sufficiently regret that the treatise which he wrote upon this subject, has

perished along with many other valuable monuments of the same age. But although we are deprived of the benefit of his observations, we are happily in the possession of an illustrious instance of their effects; and his own commentaries will ever remain as the brightest exemplar, not only of true generalship, but also of fine writing. He published them indeed only as materials for the use of those who might be disposed to enlarge upon that remarkable period of the Roman history ; yet the purity and gracefulness of his style are such, that no judicious writer afterwards dared to attempt the same subject. Cicero frequently mentions it as a very high encomium, that the celebrated Roman orators possessed the elegance of their native language: he introduces Brutus, declaring that he should prefer the honour of being esteemed the great master and improver of Roman eloquence, even to the glory of many triumphs.

As beauty of composition tends to heighten the native charms of truth, it ought never to be regarded as an object of small importance. But it may be alleged that truth requires not the foreign aid of ornament. It is not indeed necessary that she should be exhibited in a glaring habit ; but she ought certainly to be clothed with decency and propriety. A beautiful woman in careless and sordid apparel, can never appear to great advantage.

To some of the English philosophers, science has many important obligations ; but would those great authors have diminished the utility of their literary labours by employing more smooth and polished language?

Never indeed does the force of reason more

effectually subdue the human mind, than when she is supported by the powerful assistance of manly eloquence; as, on the contrary, the most legitimate arguments may be rendered unavailing by being attended with a feeble and unanimated expression. There is as much diffe- . rence between comprehending a thought clothed in the language of Cicero, and that of an ordinary writer, as there is between viewing an object by the light of the sun and by the light of a taper.

Malebranche has assuredly fallen into a very strange conceit when he insinuates, that the pleasure arising from the perusal of a beautiful composition is of a criminal nature, and has its source in the weakness and effeminacy of the human mind. That man must possess a very uncommon severity of temper, who can find any thing to condemn in the practice of embellishing truth with additional charms, and winning the heart by captivating the ear; in uniting roses with the thorns of science, and joining pleasure with instruction. The mind is delighted with a fine style, upon the same principle that it prefers regularity to confusion, and beauty to deformity. A taste for the beauties of composition is so far from being a mark of

any

depravity of our nature, that I should rather be inclined to consider it as an evidence of the moral rectitude of our mental constitution, since it furnishes a direet proof that we retain some relish of order and harmony

Few objects have ever appeared of greater importance to wise men, than to tincture the young and susceptible mind with an early relish for the pleasures of taste. Easy in general is the transition from the pursuit of such pleasures to the discharge of the higher and more important duties of human life; and sanguine hopes may commonly be entertained of the pupil who has evinced this liberal and elegant turn of mind. It is favourable to the growth of many virtues ; whereas to be devoid of taste for the fine arts, is justly regarded as an unpromising symptom in youth, and raises suspicions of their being prone to low gratifications, or destined to drudge in the more vulgar and illiberal pursuits of life. There are few good dispositions of any kind with which the improvement of this faculty is not in some degree connected. A cultivated taste increases sensibility to all the tender and humane passions, by giving them frequent exercise ; while, on the other hand, it tends to weaken the more violent and fierce emotions, by exciting in us a lively sense of decorum.

From these observations it will appear that the charge of Malebranche is not only ill founded, but absolutely ridiculous. One would however be apt to suspect that certain writers among us had considered the subject in the same gloomy point of view; or at least that they had studiously avoided every refinement in style, as unbecoming a lover of truth and wisdom. Their sentiments are debased by the lowest expressions; they seem condemned to the curse of creeping upon the ground all the days of their life.

But there is another extreme, which ought also to be carefully avoided. Language may be too pompous, as well as too mean. Some authors mistake pomp for dignity; and with the view of raising their expressions above vulgar language, elevate them above common apprehension. They seem to consider it as a mark of