 | 1869 - 1032 sivua
...conclusion : that there must be reasonable evidence of negligence ; that where the thing is solely under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen to those who have the management of machinery and use... | |
 | 1866 - 1074 sivua
...decision of the Court of Exchequer), that where tlie thing which causes the accident is shewn to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained, is reasonable... | |
 | Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee, Edmund F. Moore - 1864 - 596 sivua
...to warrant the Judge in leaving the case to the jury. But that where the thing is shown to be under the management of the Defendant or his Servants, and...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the («) 3 H. 4 C. 596. Defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." Now, that was a case in... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 930 sivua
...declared by the Exchequer Chamber, that where the thing which causes the accident is known to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained, is reasonable... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 944 sivua
...declared by the Exchequer Chamber, that where the thing which causes the accident is known to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is *uch as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained,... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 sivua
...LRUS, 134,) said: "There must be some evidence of negligence, but when the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants and the accident is such that, as in the ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use the... | |
 | 1881 - 572 sivua
...(Ex.) 220, "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such us in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,... | |
 | 1881 - 572 sivua
...(Ex.) ZX>, "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to bo under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such из iu the ordinary course of things does not bap)>eii if those who have the management use proper... | |
 | 1871 - 874 sivua
...said, " There must be reasonable evidence of negligence ; tut where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." So in Ourtis v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad... | |
 | Victoria. Supreme Court - 1871 - 380 sivua
...under the management of the defendant, the accident is such aa in the ordinary course does not happen if ^those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care. Seoll v. London Dock Company,... | |
| |
J., observed that in order for it to apply "there must be reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not... 
