What's Wrong with Children's Rights
Harvard University Press, 2009 - 320 sivua
Children's rights: the phrase has been a legal battle cry for twenty-five years. But as this provocative book by a nationally renowned expert on children's legal standing argues, it is neither possible nor desirable to isolate children from the interests of their parents, or those of society as a whole. From foster care to adoption to visitation rights and beyond, Martin Guggenheim offers a trenchant analysis of the most significant debates in the children's rights movement, particularly those that treat children's interests as antagonistic to those of their parents. Guggenheim argues that children's rights can serve as a screen for the interests of adults, who may have more to gain than the children for whom they claim to speak. More important, this book suggests that children's interests are not the only ones or the primary ones to which adults should attend, and that a best interests of the child standard often fails as a meaningful test for determining how best to decide disputes about children.
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
What's wrong with children's rightsKäyttäjän arvio - Not Available - Book Verdict
"As deeply as I've always thought of myself as a children's advocate, much of what I read and hear being advocated in furtherance of children's rights seems to me misguided," writes Guggenheim (The ... Lue koko arvostelu
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
able abortion abuse adoption adults advance advocates allow American argue authority become believe best interests better birth chapter chil child child welfare children's rights choice claim concern consent consider constitutional rights continue custody DeBoers decide decision denied develop difficult dren efforts ents equal federal foster freedom give grandparents harm important involved Iowa issues Jessica's judge Justice lawyers least legislation less limited live marriage married matter means Michigan minors mother move movement never obtain officials once opinion parental rights particular party permitted person pregnancy principles protect question raise reason recognized relationship remain responsibility result Review rights doctrine role rule seek served significant social society standard statute suggest Supreme Court terminate things tion treated United unwed fathers visitation women York