Sivut kuvina
PDF
ePub

there is a list of the writings ascribed to Orpheus, of which the following are the principal.

1. 'Iepoi Xoyo (sacred legends), a complete system of Orphic theology, in twenty-four books; it is ascribed to Cercops and Diognetus, and is probably the production of several authors.

2. Teλerai (religious rites, or mysteries), directions for worshipping and appeasing the Gods; probably by Onomacritus.

3. Xohopo (prophecies). Similar works were ascribed to Musæus.

The origin of the term 'orrery' is thus given by Mr Desaguliers, in his Course of Experimental Philosophy,' 4to., London, 1734, i., p. 431. After stating his belief that Mr. George Graham, about the year 1700, first invented a movement for exhibiting the motion of the earth about the sun at the same time that the moon revolved round the earth, he remarks, This machine being in the hands of an instrument-maker to be sent with some of his own instruments to Prince Eugene, he copied it, and made the first for the late Earl of Orrery, and then several others with additions of his own. Sir Richard Steele, who knew nothing of Mr. Graham's machine, in one of his lucubrations, thinkinventor, of such a curious instrument, called it an orrery, and gave Mr. J. Rowley the praise due to Mr. Graham.'

4. Bákyika, probably stories of Bacchus and his mysteries; ascribed to Arignotes, a pupil or daughter of Pytha-ing to do justice to the first encourager, as well as to the goras.

5. 'H is Aïdov karáßaois (the descent to Hades), a poem of great antiquity, ascribed, among other authors, to Cer

cops.

6. Hymns, also of high antiquity. In the time of Plato they were recited by rhapsodists at the public games. Onomacritus appears to have been the author of many of them.

7. Of Stones, their nature, and their powers against serpents and poisons, and for appeasing the anger of the gods.

8. Argonautica, a poem on the voyage of the Argonauts to Colchis; probably by Onomacritus; at least by some one not earlier than Homer.

9. Fragments, which have been carefully collected by Gesner out of Platonic and Christian writers. Most of them are of a later date than the Christian æra.

The following are the principal editions of the Orphic poems: Orphei Argonautica, Hymni, et de Lapidibus,' Gr., in H. Stephens's Poetæ Græci Principes Heroici Carminis,' 1566, fol.; Orphei Argonautica, Hymni, et de Lapidibus, curante A. C. Eschenbachio, cum not. erudit.,' Utrecht, 1689; 'Oρpéws äñavтa, ‘Orphei Arg., Hym., de Lapid., et Fragmenta, cum notis Stephani et Eschenbachii, ex recens. et cum not. J. M. Gesneri,' Lips., 1764; Orphica," by Schaeffer, Lips., 1818; ditto, by Hermann, Lips., 1805; Argonautica,' by Schneider, Jena, 1803.

Tiedemann's Initia Philos. Græc., p. 1-100; Fabric., Bib. Græc., i., p. 140, &c.; Clinton's Fasti; Funke's Real. Schullexicon.)

ORPIMENT. [ARSENIC.]

ORPINE is a succulent herbaceous plant, the Sedum Telephium of botanists, found abundantly in some parts of England in woods and thickets. It has oval serrated leaves, erect stems, and close carpels of purple flowers; and has some reputation for its astringency: the root and stem, boiled in milk, are a popular remedy for diarrhoea.

ORRERY. There are four planetary machines to which distinct names have been given, corresponding to the phenomena they are intended to exhibit, and which, when combined so as to derive their motions from a common origin, constitute what is now generally understood by an orrery. These machines are the Planetarium, Tellurian, Lunarian, and Satellite machine. The planetarium is a mechanical representation of the orbital motions of the planets about the sun, either in circles or ellipses, and with angular velocities either uniform or variable, according to the quality of the instrument. The tellurian and lunarian, when connected in their improved form, exhibit the motion of the moon about the earth and that of the earth about the sun, and the principal phenomena which accompany the changes in their relative positions, such as the succession of day and night and the variable length of both according to the season of the year, the eclipses of the sun and moon, the variations in the moon's latitude, velocity, and distance from the earth, the progressive motion of her apogee, and the retrogradation of her nodes, &c. The satellite machine is chiefly intended to represent the motions of Jupiter's satellites about their primary, combined with the motions of the latter about the sun. Instead of attempting a particular description of any one of these machines, which could only be rendered intelligible by reference to many diagrams, while the object would be much better attained by a simple inspection of the machine itself, we shall confine ourselves to a brief notice of their history and to the explanation of the general principles upon which the construction of modern planetary machines depends, referring our readers for more ample information to the article Planetary Machines' in Brewster's Cyclopædia, contributed by the Rev. W. Pearson, formerly treasurer of the Astronomical Society.

Planetary machines were in use at a very remote period, and appear to have consisted for many centuries of moveable spheres having the earth in their centre: thus we read of the Chinese spheres said to have been made some 2000 years before the Christian æra, and more recently of the spheres of Archimedes and Posidonius, concerning which Cicero, speaking of the Epicurean philosophy, has the following remarkable passage:

If the sphere, lately made by our friend Posidonius, which marks the course of the sun and moon and the five wandering stars, were to be transported into Scythia or Britain, who, even in those barbarous countries, would doubt whether reason had presided over its construction? Yet these people (the Epicureans) doubt whether the universe, whence all things arise and are made, is not the effect of chance or of some necessity rather than of reason and a divine mind; and they regard Archimedes as more deserving of praise in imitating the changes of the sphere than nature in producing them.' (De Nat. Deor., lib. ii., cap. 34 and 35.) The earliest machine which represented the Ptolemaic system may possibly have been that possessed by Chromatus, in the construction of which no less than 200 pounds weight of gold are said to have been used. This system continued to be represented in all planetary machines till about fifteen years after the death of Copernicus, when the last of that kind of any note was erected in the library of the Pantheon at Paris by Oronce Finée.

In the latter part of the seventeenth century Huyghens and Roemer employed themselves in the construction of planetary machines in conformity with the Copernican doctrine. The one invented by Huyghens, who first introduced a systematic method of calculating with precision the necessary wheel-work for these machines, received from its author the name of the Automaton.' It derived its motion from a spring regulated by a balance, the pendulum not having been then introduced as a regulating agent, and served for many years as a pattern in the construction of orreries, as did the instrument of Roemer, called by him a Planetarium, in the construction of machines intended chiefly to exhibit the orbital motions of the planets. Roemer had also invented a satellite machine prior to the year 1679, the original or a copy of which was presented by him in that year to the English astronomer Flamsteed. Both his machines are described in his Basis Astronomiæ,' printed in 1735. The last machine we shall mention is the Planetarium of the Royal Institution of London, constructed about the year 1801, shortly after Dr. Garnett, having previsously removed his apparatus elsewhere, discontinued his astronomical lectures at that institution. For a description of this machine, the plan of which was suggested by Dr. Young and the Rev. W. Pearson, we must again refer to the paper On Planetary Machines,' by the latter gentleman.

[ocr errors]

The chief part of every orrery is the mechanism composing the planetarium, by means of which the paths of the planets about the sun and their relative periodic times are exhibited with more or less approach to truth; and this mechanism, with the method of computing it, being once understood, it will be easy to extend the same principles to the more complex cases in which the satellites revolve about their primaries at the same time that the latter rotate upon their axes and revolve about the sun, as well as to those in which the parallelism of the planets' axes and the changes in the positions of their orbits, &c. are sought to be represented. For this reason we shall confine ourselves to the method of computing the wheel-work, which will give the relative periods with any required degree of accuracy, and to the explanation of a very ingenious contrivance by means of which a true elliptic orbit may be produced. Before how

ever proceeding to this, we would caution the purchasers of
these expensive toys (those exhibited in the shops of mathe-
matical instrument makers vary in price from sixteen to
forty guineas) against a defect which was at one time not
uncommon and may still exist, and which, while it rendered
them worse than useless, showed how little knowledge their
contrivers could have possessed of the science they are in-
tended to illustrate. We allude to the substitution of the
synodic for the sidereal periods, whereby each planetary ball
was made to revolve about the sun in the time which ought
to have elapsed between two consecutive conjunctions of such
planet with the earth.
To produce the revolution of the planetary balls about
the sun, a system of vertical concentric tubes is usually em-
ployed, which are adjusted very near to each other, but yet
so far removed as not to influence each other's motion.
These tubes are of different lengths, the innermost being
the longest, and to the superior extremity of each a radius
vector is attached, and thereby made to revolve once during
each revolution of the tube. The lower extremities of the
tubes form the arbors or axes of as many toothed wheels,
which are either immediately driven by pinions adjusted to
a vertical axle called the annual arbor,' or derive their
motions indirectly from those pinions by means of an inter-
posed train of wheels. The determination of the relative
number of teeth which must be given to the wheels and
pinions in order to produce any required motion may be
thus explained.

the annual arbor, it is only necessary that the wheel which is
adjusted to the lower extremity of the earth's tube should
contain the same number of teeth as the pinion by which
it is driven, and which is adjusted to the annual arbor. In
this case each revolution of the annual arbor will be the
measure of one solar year. If each revolution the annual
arbor be required to represent any assigned portion of a
year, the necessary modification in the relative number o.
teeth in the earth's wheel and pinion will appear sufficiently
obvious from what has preceded; but for the sake of sim-
plicity, we shall assume that the earth's radius vector revolves
exactly once during each revolution of the annual arbor
and upon this supposition we have now to fix the relative
number of teeth which should be given to the wheels and
pinions which regulate the motions of the other planetary
balls. It generally happens that the number of revolutions
which the radius vector of any one of the planetary balls is
required to make during one revolution of the annual arbor
is expressed in the form of a decimal. Suppose, for instance,
that the relative motion required were that of the earth and
Jupiter. Jupiter revolves in 4332-5848 mean solar days;
the earth in 365-2564 mean solar days; the number of re-
volutions made by Jupiter during one revolution of the
0843045. If this decimal be
earth is therefore
converted into a continued fraction by the rule given at
page 402, vol. x, the resulting series of fractions, which ap-
proximate more and more nearly to '0843045, will be found
to be
&c., any one of which, ac-
"
11 12 83 344' 1115'
cording to the degree of accuracy required, may be taken
for the ratio which the number of leaves in the pinion must
bear to the number of teeth in the wheel, if only a single
wheel and pinion be employed, or the ratio which the pro-
duct of the number of leaves must bear to the product of
the number of teeth, if a train of wheels and pinions be
employed. If the first of these fractions, or its equivalent,

A pinion generally means a wheel consisting of a less number of teeth than that which it drives, but in the present article this restriction is unnecessary. The teeth of a pinion are called leaves. The number of revolutions made by the wheel during one revolution of the pinion by which it is driven, is found by dividing the number of leaves in the pinion by the number of teeth in the wheel:-thus, if there be 35 leaves and 7 teeth, the wheel will make 5 revolutions during one revolution of the pinion; but if 77' or there be 7 leaves and 35 teeth, the wheel will make 35

1

5

35

7

7

or

of a revolution during one entire revolution of the pinion. If to the axle of the wheel be adjusted a second pinion, which drives a second wheel, and if to the axle of this wheel a third pinion be adjusted which drives a third wheel, and so on, then the number of revolutions made by the last wheel during one revolution of the first pinion will be found by multiplying together the number of leaves in the several pinions, and dividing the result by the product of the number of teeth in the several wheels:-thus if there be four pinions, having 7, 8, 9, and 10 leaves respectively, and the same number of wheels, having 20, 21, 22, and 23 teeth respectively, the number of revolutions made by the last wheel during one revolution of the first pinion will be 7 X 8 X 9 X 10

7

365-2564

4332*5848

1 7 29 94

be taken, the wheel attached to Jupiter's tube should contain 77 teeth, and the pinion attached to the annual arbor by which it is driven should contain 7 leaves, and Jupiter's radius will then revolve once during 11 revolutions of the annual arbor, that is, in 365-2564 × 1 = 4017·8204 days, which is less than the true period by 314-7644 days. In the same manner may be found the time in which Jupiter's radius will revolve when any of the other fractions are taken, as under :

[blocks in formation]

days.
365 2564 X

4330 897

1.688

7

344

4332.699

0.114 +

29 1115 94 &c.

4332 562

0.025

[blocks in formation]

The third of these fractions, or rather its equivalent,

6 or, in other words, the last 20 X 21 X 22 X 23 253' wheel will revolve six times during 253 revolutions of the first pinion. Conversely the ratio which the product of the number of leaves must bear to the product of the number of teeth, in order to produce any required relative motion between the first pinion and the last wheel, is found by dividing the number of revolutions made by the wheel by the 166 was the one employed by Dr. Pearson in the connumber of revolutions to be made in the same time by the pinion. The actual number of teeth to be given to the struction of his new planetarium; so that in that instruwheels and pinions, as well as the number of wheels and ment the wheel attached to Jupiter's tube contains 166 pinions to be employed in any particular case, is matter of teeth, and is driven by a pinion of 14 leaves attached to the convenience, not of necessity: in every instance the employment of a single pinion and a single wheel is theoreti-annual arbor. In the planetarium of the Royal Institution, a train of wheels and pinions represented by the compound cally sufficient, but in practice it is generally desirable to avoid the use of wheels or pinions with a very large or very fraction X was employed, which therefore gives a small number of teeth. In the planetarium of the Royal Institution the number of teeth is in no instance under 7,

[blocks in formation]

111 94 X 4330 778 days. The follow22 40 period of 365:2564× ing table affords a general view of the wheel-work of the last-named instrument. The denominator of the former of the two fractions in the second column denotes the number of leaves in the pinion attached to the annual arbor; the numerator, the number of teeth in the wheel which it drives. The denominator of the second fraction denotes the number of leaves in the pinion attached to the axle of the lastmentioned wheel; the numerator, the number of teeth in

the wheel driven by this pinion, which wheel is attached to and eliminating between these equations, there results the lower extremity of its appropriate planetary tube.

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

The planets Vesta and Juno had not been discovered at the time this machine was constructed.

The contrivance by means of which a true elliptic orbit may be produced is extremely simple. For this purpose all that is necessary is that the radius vector which connects the planetary ball with the superior extremity of the tube should consist of two parts or arms, the lengths of which have a determinate ratio dependent solely upon the eccen- | tricity of the orbit, and that while the larger arm revolves | about the centre of the ellipse by means of the wheel-work already described, the smaller arm be made to revolve about the extremity of the larger with the same angular velocity but in the opposite direction. This may be effected in two ways. By means of a pulley fixed to the planetary tube and connected by an endless silken cord with another pulley free to revolve about a vertical axle situated at the extremity of the larger arm. The effect of this connection will be that the latter pulley will revolve once during each revolution of the larger arm but in the opposite direction. If therefore the smaller arm be attached to this pulley it will revolve in the manner required. The same motion may be produced by employing a double pinion extending the entire length of the larger arm and communicating the rotatory motion | given to it at one extremity, to the axle of the smaller arm situated at the other. Let R and r denote the lengths of the larger and smaller arms respectively, and let the line joining the position of the sun and the centre of the concentric tubes, considered as the origin of co-ordinates, be taken for the axis of x. The aphelion of the orbit will be the point (R+r, o). Also let e denote the inclination of the larger arm to the axis of x at any moment; then since the smaller arm revolves with the same angular velocity, but in the opposite direction, its inclination to the axis of x at that moment must be denoted by-0; and the coordinates of the extremity of the smaller arm, that is, of the position of the planetary ball, will be the sum of the projections of R andr upon the axes of x and y respectively. Representing these co-ordinates by x and y, we shall therefore have

x-R cos 0+r cos 0=(R+r) cos

y=R sin -r sin 0=(R−r) sin ;

• The oversight alluded to in p. 39, that of mistaking the synodic for the sidereal period, does not appear to have been altogether avoided in the construction of the planetarium of the Royal Institution, the wheel-work of which is computed ou the supposition that the earth completes its revolution about the sun in 365 242 days. This is the length of the tropical year, or the time which elapses between the earth's leaving the vernal equinox and its arrival again at that point of the ecliptic; and is, owing to the precession of the equinoxes, less than the earth's sidereal period.

In the descriptions of the planetarium of the Royal Institution, to which

127

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

+

(R+r)* (R-r)

=3 1, which is the well-known equation to an ellipse referred to its centre, and whose semi-focal and non-focal axes are respectively R+r and R−r. If the excentricity e of the orbit be known the relation between R and r will therefore be determined by the equation

[blocks in formation]

This method is defective in two respects. The elliptic orbits described cannot have a common focus, or else the true relative lengths of the mean distances of the planets cannot be preserved; and secondly the true angular motions of the planets about the sun are not accurately represented. Dr. Pearson corrected in some degree the latter inequality by varying the size of the teeth of the wheels and pinions employed, but for the mere purpose of illustration this appears superfluous, since, after all, the most complete mechanical representation of the solar system that has yet been invented is far inferior to that which the student may form in his own mind from an attentive perusal of a good popular treatise upon the subject.

ORRERY, EARL OF. [BOYLE.]

ORSI'NI, an old and illustrious family of Southern Italy, which has had among its members several popes, many cardinals, and other distinguished individuals. Orso Orsini, of Petigliano near the lake of Bolsena, is mentioned as senator of Rome in the years 1190-1200. His son Giovanni Orsini Gaetani, which last was his mother's family name, left two sons: 1, Napoleone Orsini, Count of Tagliacozzo in the kingdom of Naples; and 2, Matteo, styled the Great,' senator of Rome, and lord of Anagni, Marino, Galera, and other fiefs in the Campagna of Rome Matteo left several sons, one of whom, Giovanni Gaetani, became pope under the name of NICHOLAS III. A branch of the family entered the service of the Anjou kings of Naples, obtained high honours at that court, and the titles of counts of Nola and dukes of Gravina. The Orsini who remained in the Papal State were often at variance with the powerful family of COLONNA during the middle ages. The castle of Bracciano, on the lake of that name, was the chief residence of the Orsini. In January, 1505, Francis Orsini, duke of Gravina, and Paolo Orsini, were treacherously seized and strangled at Sinegaglia by Cesare Borgia, whilst the cardinal Orsini was poisoned at Rome by order of Cesare's father, Pope Alexander VI. By degrees the various branches of the Orsini became extinct, and their estates passed into other hands, with the exception of the Neapolitan branch of the dukes of Gravina, which still continues, the actual duke having married a daughter of the banker Torlonia, duke of Bracciano. The palace Orsini at Rome, a vast building, stands on the ruins of the Theatre of Marcellus. The family palace at Naples, belonging to the duke of Gravina, is one of the finest private buildings in that capital. (Imhoff, Genealogies; Moreri; Almanach de Gotha.)

ORSINI, FULVIO, said to have been an illegitimate member of the noble family of that name, was born at Rome about 1530, and became canon of St. John of Lateran. He was well versed in classical literature, both Greek and Roman, and collected a valuable library of MSS., which he bequeathed to the Vatican library. He was intimate with the cardinals Alexander and Edward Farnese, and was considered one of the first scholars of his age. He died at Rome, about the year 1600. He wrote several learned works: 1, Familiæ Romanæ quæ reperiuntur in antiquis Numismatibus, ab Urbe Condita ad tempora Divi Augusti, cum adjunctis Antonii Augustini Episcopi Ilerdensis,' fol.,

we have been able to refer, the wheel-work of Saturn is represented by 7x Paris, 1663; 2, Virgilius collatione Scriptorum Græco

[blocks in formation]

rum illustratus,' in which he points out the numerous passages in which Virgil has imitated or borrowed from the Greek poets; a very interesting commentary; 3, 'Selecta de Legationibus ex Polybio et Fragmenta ex Historiis quæ non extant Dionysii Halicarnassei, Diodori Siculi, Appiani Alexandrini, Dionis Cassii, &c.,' 4to., Antwerp, 1582, in Greek, with Latin notes, 4to.; Carmina novem illustrium Fæminarum Græcarum,' 8vo., Antwerp, 1568, and other minor publications.

[ocr errors]

ORTA LIDA. [CRACIDE, vol. vii., p. 131.] ORTE'LIUS, ABRAHAM, born at Antwerp in 1527, of a family originally from Augsburg, studied philology and mathematics, and became the first geographer of his age. After travelling through England, Germany, France, and Italy, he published his great work, 'Theatrum Orbis Terræ,' being a description of the globe, or universal geography. He was soon after appointed geographer to Philip II. of Spain. His other works are-1, Deorum Dearumque Capita ex veteribus Numismatibus;' 2, Aurei Saeculi Imago, sive Germanorum Veterum Mores, Vita, Ritus, et Religio;' 3, Itinerarium per nonnullas Galliæ Belgica Partes.' Ortelius was acquainted with most of the learned men of his age, and was particularly intimate with Justus Lipsius, who wrote his epitaph. He died in 1598. (Sweert's Vita Ortelii; Valere André, Bibliotheca Belgica.)

ORTHE'S, or ORTHEZ, a town in France, capital of an arrondissement in the department of Basses Pyrénées, 500 miles from Paris, on the road by Poitiers, Bordeaux, and Mont de Marsan to St. Jéan Pied de Port and Pamplona in Spain, and at the intersection of a cross-road from Bayonne to Pau. The town is pleasantly situated on the right bank of the Gave de Pau, which flows between steep banks of limestone. There is a suburb ou the left bank, which communicates with the town by an antient Gothic bridge. On the only pier of this bridge is a tower. The streets of the town are well laid out, and the houses tolerably well built. There are some ruins of the antient castle of Moncade, on a height commanding the town. The population of Orthès, in 1831, was 5195 for the town, or 7121 for the whole commune; in 1836, it was 7857 for the commune. The townsmen carry on trade in salt provisions, especially hams. The manufacture of linen, especially of table-linen, flourished formerly, but has much declined; that of woollen stuffs and some hardwares is carried on. There are tanyards and currying-shops. The market for cattle and corn is considerable, and there are two large yearly fairs. Slate and coal are quarried in the neighbourhood, and sulphur and petroleum are procured. Six roads converge at the town. This town was antiently subject to the viscounts of Dax, then to the princes of Béarn. Jeanne d'Albert, queen of Navarre, founded here a university for the Protestants, who then predominated in the town, and who still form a fourth or a third part of the inhabitants. They have a church; and there are a Bible Society, a high school, and several government offices.

ORTHOCE'RAS. [POLYTHALAMACEA.]

ORTHOGONAL, ORTHOGRAPHIC. The first of these terms, when not used in the same sense as the second, means simply perpendicular. Thus a curve cuts a set of curves orthogonally when it cuts them all at right angles. Orthogonal or orthographic projection is that which is made by drawing lines from every point to be projected, perpendicular to a plane of projection. Thus if a plane were horizontal, and a point were to drop from a given position upon the plane, its last position would be the orthogonal or orthographic projection of its first. [PERSPECTIVE.] ORTHOGRAPHY. When this word is looked at in its elements (two Greeks words denoting the art of writing and correctness), it would seem that there ought to be included under it whatever belongs to the art of writing a language correctly, including both what is called etymology and syntax. But the grammarians have given it a restricted sense, and it is used to denote not the writing correctly in the general, but the proper selection of literal elements of each word that is used, and the proper division of each word when one part of it is at the end of one line and another at the beginning of the line which succeeds. In the antient Hebrew manuscripts we may observe that this division of words never occurs, the scribes resorting to the expedient of widening certain of the letters, if in the ordinary form the words would not fill up the line. The lawstationers in their copies of legal documents fill up a line with a waved and unmeaning stroke, when the word which follows cannot conveniently be written in it at length. We perceive by certain grammars and dictionaries published by practical men, both at home and still more in the United States of North America, that the writers appear to suppose that their works will be resorted to even by persons of cultivation as authorities or guides to orthography. But we believe it to be the case that the number is very few of persons who actually use dictionaries for this purpose. We mean of course not mere children or persons of very imperfect education, but even of those there are very few persons who read much and write occasionally, who ever think of resorting to books of the kind we are speaking of; and persons of a better education still trust entirely to memory, and should a doubt arise, the reference would be made to some eminent author and not to the guides of which we speak. In fact, the art is acquired almost without teaching, and is maintained in vigour through a whole life by the constant practice of writing and reading. At all events there is no book, grammar, guide, or dictionary, which a scholar in England regards as in this point a book of any authority.

A severe action was fought near this town 27th February, 1814, between the allied forces under the Duke of Wellington and the French under Marshal Soult. The French were strongly posted on the right of the Gave de Pau; but Whether it would be expedient to raise some one work the Duke of Wellington, having brought seven divisions of into an authority in such a point as this, is in fact a question British and Portuguese infantry and two brigades of cavalry-one of the greatest in philology that can be proposedto bear on the position of the French, dislodged them from whether there shall be an invariable standard established to all their posts, and obliged them to retreat. The French which a living language shall for ever conform. We doubt suffered great loss in killed and by desertion; the loss of not only the possibility but the expediency of this: and in the British was about 2300. (Duke of Wellington's Des- respect of orthography, we are quite sure that no such stanpatches.) Some French writers, as Malte Brun and Vaysse dard can be raised, because it would be quite impracticable de Villiers, have given a very exaggerated statement of the to bring all persons who have a right to a voice in such a number and the loss of the allies. matter to an agreement in any one system involving the admission of certain fixed principles. The contemporary usage of persons of cultivation, meaning of a great preponderating majority, which will always exist, is, we apprehend, the authority to which each person who aspires to write correctly must continue to defer.

The arrondissement of Orthès contains 152 communes, and comprehends an area of 454 square miles; it is subdivided into seven cantons or districts, each under a justice of the peace. The population in 1831 was 84,689; in 1836, 87,459. ORTHITE. Silicate of Cerium, Iron, &c. This mineral occurs in minute, slender, columnar imbedded masses. Fracture conchoidal; hardness 6'0, 70. Colour grey, inclining to black. Streak brownish grey. Lustre vitreous. Opaque. Specific gravity 3-288.

Before the blow-pipe swells and fuses into a blackish globule; with borax it gives a transparent glass. Gelatinizes in acids and yields a solution of cerium.

it is found at Finbo, near Fahlun in Sweden, and also in Greenland, &c.

Analysis of the mineral from Finbo, by Berzelius :—
Silica

Protoxide of Cerium

36, 25

17.39

11.42

14.00

4.89

Protoxide of Iron

Alumina

Lime

Yttria

3.80

[blocks in formation]

This has been the standard to which reference has always hitherto been made. Open any book printed in the reign of Queen Anne, and many words will present themselves in an orthography very different from that in which they would now be found. But we must not say that the persons who wrote them wrote incorrectly, if they wrote according to the practice of the cultivated persons of their time. If we ascend still higher and go to the reign of Elizabeth, we find the orthography still more diverse from our own; and when we reach the time of Caxton, and still more when we go back to the time of Chaucer and Wickliffe, we find many words which, though they are actually words now in use, are so disguised in their orthographical form that we can scarcely recognise them. We seem to have got among a people who spoke a different language, though they were our own forefathers, not more than ten or twelve generations above our grandfathers.

This has arisen from the want of a standard; something fixed, not varying like usage. There is an inconvenience in

VOL. XVII.--G

it as respects the writers before the time of Caxton and the invention of printing, and we may reasonably wish that with reference to them there had been some less varying standard and a continuous uniformity; but when we look in the writings of the men of the Elizabethan period, we find that though now two centuries and a half have passed, there is no more difficulty in perusing them than there is in perusing the writings of our own day; and that the same will be the case in respect of the writings of the present day in the hands of Englishmen four or five centuries hence, may be safely foretold. So that there is no real prejudice arising from the apparently unphilosophical and dangerous course of leaving this point to be regulated by anything so uncertain as contemporary usage.

At present the number of words of which the orthography is not uniform in all writings which aspire at once to be correct and devoid of affectation, is exceedingly small. Take this sentence and the whole of the paragraph which precedes it; is there any word, except this word precede, in which any variety would be found in the ordinary current writings of the day? Or if we found a variety, should we not say that the deviation from the usual practice was a casual mistake, a slip of the press, an affectation, or that it was the result of some peculiar principle which some peculiar person had adopted? And even this word precede, though it belongs to a class in which orthography is not uniform, we should probably very rarely find written in any other way, for few persons would prefer the form preceed, if indeed such a form is ever used. So that practically a great and perhaps quite sufficient degree of uniformity and stability may be said to be secured under the regulating power which now exists.

Dictionaries and vocabularies, as affording an easy guide to the knowledge of what is the usage, may have their use in this respect to a few persons who write occasionally only; but as authorities, we repeat, they are of no avail.

There is one point to which persons who take this view of the subject do not seem sufficiently to attend, and that is, the havock which any material changes in our orthography, so as to reduce it to some one system, would make in that beautiful poetry by which our language is ennobled, and which will preserve it at once from extinction and from any very material changes.

The words are in reality very few of which the orthography may not be said to be now established by the great Jus et Norma Loquendi, Custom. We take the following from a modern grammar, as being those which, in the opinion of the writer, are most frequently found with orthographical

varieties:-
:-

[blocks in formation]

allege
complete
connexion
abridgment
surprise

alledge
compleat
connection
abridgement
surprize

Of course some of these represent classes. But what are these to the great body of such a language as ours? And with respect to the first and to the last, each of which represents a large family of words, we would submit that very few persons indeed who were entitled to a voice in a question of this kind would be found writing honor; and that there is a most excellent rule by which we imagine all persons of education allow themselves to be guided respecting words in ise or ize. The rule is this: when the word is a derivative of the French prendre, as is the case with surprise, enterprise, and one or two others, to write it with the ise; but when it comes to us from the Greek, as in agonize, and several other words, to keep the Greek termination -Anglicć, ize.

O'RTHONYX, M. Temminck's name for a genus of birds arranged by Mr. Swainson with Buphaga under Buphagine; these two genera forming the whole of that subfamily.

It has been matter of complaint that the orthography of the English language is not more uniform; that is, that words which are composed in whole or in part of the same elements are not uniform in the manner in which those elements are exhibited. Thus all words derived of the Latin cedo with prepositions prefixed, it may be said should Generic Character.-Bill very short, straight, but the be in one form, and it is a variety in defence of which nothing culmen arched from the base; sides considerably compressed. can well be pleaded that we should write proceed and yet Nostrils large, basal. Wings moderate, but considerably write also concede. So with respect to such words as honour, rounded; the four first quills graduated, and shorter than favour, odour, labour, it may be said that there should be the fifth. Tail rather lengthened, rounded; the feathers uniformity with other words like them, in which the u is very broad, and the webs soft, but the shafts stiff, very not found, and further, that we should keep to the ortho- rigid, and terminating in naked points. Feet enormously graphy of the Latin words of which they are forms equally large and strong. The outer toe rather longer than the in meaning and orthography. This appears plausible, but middle, which is again longer than the inner toe; hinder when it is considered that these words do not come to us im-toe shorter than the middle. Tarsus longer than either of mediately from the Latin, but have passed to us through the French, we recognise in the unnecessary letter u a part of the history of the word, which a person of true taste would scarcely be willing to relinquish for an advantage so trivial. Or take the rough word through: some may think that the three last letters may well be dispensed with, but they remain a pleasing evidence of the origin of the word in the rough and strong speech of our Saxon ancestors.

These little irregularities in orthography, like irregularities in other parts of grammar, are not to be regarded as evils. Such irregularities give birth to what are called idioms, in which no small part of the beauty of a language lies.

Attempts have however been made by ingenious men to introduce a greater degree of uniformity into our orthography. There is a treatise on the management of bees, printed about two centuries ago, in which we have a peculiar orthography on a system of the author's own. Ritson, in the last century, in some of his works adopted an orthography of his own. Professed writers on grammar have done the same; some of them to such an extent that the language, as written by them, can scarcely be known to be English. A more moderate reform is attempted by an American writer, Dr. Noah Webster, the author of an English Dictionary, which has been reprinted in this country; and Mr. Bromby of Hull, a learned and ingenious clergyman, has printed for private circulation a translation of the treatise of Plutarch concerning music, in which the orthography is regulated by certain principles which he lays down in the preface. But no writer who has made such an attempt has ever gained in any way the slightest share of public attention. Practically the usage is thought or found to be sufficient.

the toes. Claws strong, very slightly curved; the anterior all of the same length; the hinder one longest. (Sw.) Geographical Distribution.-Australia only. (Sw.) Example, Orthonyx Spinicuudus, Temm. Orthonyx Temminckii, Vig. and Horsf.

Description.-Rufous brown above, lineated with black; lesser coverts of the wings grey, streaked with brown; plumes of the top of the head slightly prolonged into a sort of false crest, which is however but little apparent; tail rounded, of a tarnished brown colour, each feather-stem terminated by a point furnished with small stiff bristle-like appendages. A bright orange patch covers the breast of the male, which part is white in the female.

Locality.-M. Lesson states that this bird is said to be a native of New Zealand. The specimen in the museum of the Linnean Society of London was presented by Mr. Brown, who met with it near Hat Hill in 1804.

Messrs. Vigors and Horsfield speak of this genus (Linn. Trans., vol. xv.), which consists of the single species above noticed, as holding the same place in Australia as the true Certhia fills in the antient continent, and the numerous group of Dendrocolaptes, Herm., in South America. They observe that it possesses the strong and lengthened shafts of the tail-feathers which support the typical scansorial birds in climbing, and that it immediately connects the whole group by a strong affinity to the woodpeckers.

Mr. Swainson (Classification of Birds, vol. i.), having described the foot of Sclerurus, the rasorial genus, in his opinion, of the circle of Certhiana, refers to Orthonyx as the next modification. He describes the bird as rather larger than a sparrow, but with the general form and proportions of Manura, except in the tail. Like Mænura, the

« EdellinenJatka »