...Wright & Hudson, for appellee. SERVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the...

...the circumstances exist which create such a duty: 111 US 228; 129 Mass. 364. The question of whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury should have been submitted to the jury: 94 US 469; 109 SC 122; LR 3 CP 216, 222, 591 ; LR 5 HL 45 ;...

...events, more or less dependent upon those preceding, and it is the province of the jury to look at this succession of events or facts and ascertain whether...in view of the circumstances existing at the time. If we are not mistaken in these opinions, the Circuit Court was correct in refusing to affirm the defendants'...

...events, more or- less dependent upon those preceding, and it is the province of the jury to look at this succession of events or facts, and ascertain...in view of the circumstances existing at the time. Ryan v. The NYC RR., 35 N. Y., 210, and Ken- v. The Penn. RR. Co., 62 Pa. St., 353, disapproved. Judgment...

...of events, more or less dependent upon those preceding, and it is the province of a jury to look at this succession of events or facts, and ascertain...in view of the circumstances existing at the time. If we are not mistaken in these opinions, the Circuit Court was correct in refusing to affirm the defendants'...

...case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The crucial question in this case is whether or not the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury of the plaintiff, so that, in the legal acceptation of that term, it contributed to her hurt. "Causo...

...of events, more or less dependent upon those preceding, and it is the province of a jury to look at this succession of events or facts and ascertain whether...in view of the circumstances existing at the time." cause not incident to such negligence which intervened to cause the same. There is, I think, but one...

...of events, more or less dependent upon those preceding; and it is the province of a jury to look at this succession of events or facts, and ascertain...negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of injury to Mrs. Brown, as there was no other canse. not incident to such negligence, which intervened...

...of events more or less dependent upon those preceding, and It Is the province of a Jury to look at this succession of events or facts and ascertain whether...Independent agencies, and this must be determined in view of tbe circumstances existing at the time." The various authorities and text-writers in attempting to...

...afterwards performed, and the suffering occasioned thereby, then and in that case I charge you that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury, for which jihiintiff seeks to recover damages." The court refused to give these requested instructions,...