 | 1927 - 1246 sivua
...act not expressly repealing it, and prevails over general statute in cases of necessary repugnancy. Statute general in its terms, and not expressly repealing a prior special statute, does not affect special provisions of earlier statute, but to the extent of any necessary repugnancy... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1921 - 742 sivua
...United States, 185 US 83 [46 L. Ed. 816; 22 Sup. Ct. 582], the syllabus of which is in part as follows : "Where there are two statutes, the earlier special and the later general (the terms of the general being broad enough to include the matter provided for in the special) the fact that one is special... | |
 | Oregon State University. Agricultural Experiment Station - 1900 - 556 sivua
...of the Experiment Station and supersedes the same. It is a general rule of construction of statutes that a later statute, general in its terms and not...special statute, will ordinarily not affect the special provision of such earlier statute. See Roger v. United States, 185 US 87 and 88, and cases there cited.... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1905 - 786 sivua
...subsequently to the special act. Mr. Justice BRKWER, speaking for the whole court, there said that: "It is a canon of statutory construction that a later...In other words, where there are two statutes, the curlier special and the later general, the terms of the general broad enoiigh to include the matter... | |
 | Wisconsin. Attorney General's Office - 1908 - 1060 sivua
...145^?>. The question arises, would such later enactment repeal the former by implieation ? It is a eanon of statutory construction that a later statute general...ordinarily not affect the special provisions of such earlicr statute. In other words, where there are two statutes, the earlicr special and the later general,... | |
 | United States. District Court (Hawaii) - 1911 - 864 sivua
...above. In reaching these conclusions I have been largely influenced by the following citations : " It is a canon of statutory construction that a later...general in its terms and not expressly repealing a prior statute, will ordinarily not affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. In other words,... | |
 | Indiana. Appellate Court - 1913 - 836 sivua
...construction that a later 2. statute, general in its terms, and not expressly repealing an earlier statute, will ordinarily not affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. Lewis's Sutherland, Stat. Constr. §274; Potter's Dwarris, Stat. 154; Waterworks Co. v. B-urkhart (1872),... | |
| |
It is a canon of statutory construction that a later statute, general in its terms and not expressly repealing a prior special statute, will ordinarily not affect the special provisions of such earlier statute. 
