Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 sivua |
Kirjan sisältä
Tulokset 1 - 3 kokonaismäärästä 11
Sivu 51
... boundaries between the groups are sharply drawn and immutable , in the sense that , for whatever reasons , it is impossible or at least very difficult for individuals to move from one group to the other . In the same way , the basic ...
... boundaries between the groups are sharply drawn and immutable , in the sense that , for whatever reasons , it is impossible or at least very difficult for individuals to move from one group to the other . In the same way , the basic ...
Sivu 173
... boundaries between them . " ( p . 217. ) They found that before and after performance on a group task the ratings of the own group were more favourable than of the other group in both the competitive and non - competitive condition ...
... boundaries between them . " ( p . 217. ) They found that before and after performance on a group task the ratings of the own group were more favourable than of the other group in both the competitive and non - competitive condition ...
Sivu 203
... boundaries , status differences should moderate mutual antagonism . There is evidence for both positions . Van der Berghe ( 1967 ) , for instance , distinguishes between racism in " paternalistic " and " com- petitive " societies . Both ...
... boundaries , status differences should moderate mutual antagonism . There is evidence for both positions . Van der Berghe ( 1967 ) , for instance , distinguishes between racism in " paternalistic " and " com- petitive " societies . Both ...
Sisältö
Contributors | 1 |
2 Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 45 |
Social Categorization Social Identity and Social | 61 |
Tekijänoikeudet | |
18 muita osia ei näytetty
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
accentuation analysis analysis of variance attributes booklet boys Chapter characteristics choices cognitive alternatives competition concerned conflict consensus context creativity criteria described dimension discussed distinctiveness Doise dominant group effects ethnic groups ethnocentrism ethnolinguistic evaluation example existing experiment experimental conditions factors favour Giles girls group members group membership HENRI TAJFEL Hutu hypotheses illegitimacy important individual ingroup bias ingroup favouritism interaction intergroup behaviour intergroup differentiation intergroup discrimination intergroup relations interindividual interpersonal L.S. group language Lemaine linguistic markers matrices means minimal MIP+MD one's perceived positive predictions present psychological questionnaire ratings reference relationship relative relevant responses scores self-favouritism significant similar social categorization social change social comparison social groups social identity social psychology social situation speech status differences status group strategies structure subjects superior group supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threatened Tutsi University of Bristol unthreatened values variables