Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 sivua |
Kirjan sisältä
Tulokset 1 - 3 kokonaismäärästä 50
Sivu 78
... matrices were so constructed that we could assess the separate " pull " of several decision strategies . These strategies were : maximum joint profit ( i.e. the strategy of awarding the maximum joint amount on each matrix , so that all ...
... matrices were so constructed that we could assess the separate " pull " of several decision strategies . These strategies were : maximum joint profit ( i.e. the strategy of awarding the maximum joint amount on each matrix , so that all ...
Sivu 103
... matrix which results in the greatest possible common benefit to the two recipients , i.e. the column in the matrix which corresponds to the highest total number of points that can be awarded . That choice in a matrix which results in ...
... matrix which results in the greatest possible common benefit to the two recipients , i.e. the column in the matrix which corresponds to the highest total number of points that can be awarded . That choice in a matrix which results in ...
Sivu 114
... matrix - types are designed to measure the strengths or " pulls " of different strategies or variables on the Ss ' choices . The definitions of these variables are given in Table 1. Matrix - type D measures the pull of MJP on MD + MS ...
... matrix - types are designed to measure the strengths or " pulls " of different strategies or variables on the Ss ' choices . The definitions of these variables are given in Table 1. Matrix - type D measures the pull of MJP on MD + MS ...
Sisältö
Contributors | 1 |
2 Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 45 |
Social Categorization Social Identity and Social | 61 |
Tekijänoikeudet | |
18 muita osia ei näytetty
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
accentuation analysis analysis of variance attributes booklet boys Chapter characteristics choices cognitive alternatives competition concerned conflict consensus context creativity criteria described dimension discussed distinctiveness Doise dominant group effects ethnic groups ethnocentrism ethnolinguistic evaluation example existing experiment experimental conditions factors favour Giles girls group members group membership HENRI TAJFEL Hutu hypotheses illegitimacy important individual ingroup bias ingroup favouritism interaction intergroup behaviour intergroup differentiation intergroup discrimination intergroup relations interindividual interpersonal L.S. group language Lemaine linguistic markers matrices means minimal MIP+MD one's perceived positive predictions present psychological questionnaire ratings reference relationship relative relevant responses scores self-favouritism significant similar social categorization social change social comparison social groups social identity social psychology social situation speech status differences status group strategies structure subjects superior group supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threatened Tutsi University of Bristol unthreatened values variables