Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Reports of Cases Adjudged in the District Court of South Carolina. [1792-1809]
Thomas Bee,Francis Hopkinson,United States District Court (South Ca
Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2015
according actor admiralty admitted allowed American amount answer appears apply arrived authority belonging bill bound brig British brought captain capture cargo carried cause charge Charleston circumstances citizens claim claimant commission committed common condemnation congress consequence consideration considered consul contended contract costs court crew damages decided decision decree determined discharge dismissed dollars entitled evidence executive express foreign France French give given ground hands high seas hypothecation island judge jurisdiction land letter libel mariner master mate means month necessary neutral offence officers opinion original owners paid parties persons plea port possession present principle privateer prize proceed proceedings produced proved provisions question reason received respecting sailed salvage says schooner seamen sentence ship sold sufficient suit taken tion treaty United vessel voyage wages whole
Sivu 19 - Courts, as the case may be, of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only, in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States...
Sivu 326 - ... which it has determined. In some cases, that jurisdiction unquestionably depends as well on the state of the thing as on the constitution of the court. If by any means whatever a prize court should be induced to condemn, as prize of war, a vessel which was never captured, it...
Sivu 20 - That the district courts shall take cognizance of complaints, by whomsoever instituted, in cases of captures made within the waters of the United States, or within a marine league of the coasts or shores thereof.
Sivu 267 - ... whom they consulted, as much against the laws of the land as to murder or rob, or combine to murder or rob, its own citizens ; and as much to require punishment, if done within their limits, where they have a territorial jurisdiction, or on the high seas, where they have a personal jurisdiction, that is to say, one which reaches their own citizens only, this being an appropriate part of each nation on an element where all have a common jurisdiction.
Sivu 302 - By the maritime law of nations universally and immemorially received, there is an established method of determination, whether the capture be, or be not, lawful prize. Before the ship or goods can be disposed of by the captor there must be a regular judicial proceeding wherein both parties may be heard, and condemnation thereupon as prize in a Court of Admiralty, judging by the law of nations and treaties.
Sivu 284 - The President is the sole organ of the nation in its external relations, and its sole representative with foreign nations.
Sivu 284 - The treaty, which is a law, enjoins the performance of a particular object. The person who is to perform this object is marked out by the constitution, since the person is named who conducts the foreign intercourse, and is to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. The means by which it is to be performed, the force of the nation, are in the hands of this person. Ought not this person to perform the object, although the particular mode of using the means has not been prescribed ? Congress...