 | John Elijah Blunt - 1830 - 174 sivua
...case, land cannot be taken in recompense.But, indeed, a Jew cannot have any thing of his own, because whatever he acquires, he acquires not for himself, but for the king; because they live not for themselves but for others, and thus they acquire not for themselves but for... | |
 | John Elijah Blunt - 1830 - 176 sivua
...MSS. No. 215. p. 77. ‘ t lb. pense. But, indeed, a Jew cannot have any thing of his own, because whatever he acquires, he acquires not for himself, but for the king; because they live - not for themselves but for others, and thus they acquire not for themselves but... | |
 | John Elijah Blunt - 1830 - 172 sivua
...case, land cannot be taken in recompense.But, indeed, a Jew cannot have any thing of his own, because whatever he acquires, he acquires not for himself, but for the king; because they live not for themselves but for others, and thus they acquire not for themselves but for... | |
 | 1862 - 914 sivua
...the absolute property of the Crown. So Bracton says, " A Jew can have nothing of his own; because, whatever he acquires, he acquires not for himself but for the king : for they live not for themselves but for others, and thus acquire for others and not for themselves." J... | |
 | England. Curia Regis, Edward James Watson - 1902 - 194 sivua
...could own nothing, for, as Bracton puts it, " whatever they acquire, they acquire, not for themselves but for the King; for the Jews live not for themselves, but for others, and so they acquire for others, and not for themselves." 2 But save the King, they were free as regards all men. They became... | |
 | 1914 - 670 sivua
...English jurisprudence, to testify as follows: ' But a Jew cannot have anything of his own, because whatever he acquires he acquires not for himself but for the king, because they do not live for themselves but for others, and so they acquire for others and not for... | |
 | Jewish Historical Society of England - 1922 - 292 sivua
...the Jews and all that they \ have are the King's," or of Bracton, " The Jew can have nothing that lis his own, for whatever he acquires he acquires not for himself, but lor the King ; for the Jews live not for themselves, and so they acquire not for themselves, but for... | |
 | Salo Wittmayer Baron - 1967 - 448 sivua
...Reviewing the conditions in the thirteenth century, Henry de Bracton, with involuntary humor, observed, "The Jew can have nothing that is his own, for whatever...so they acquire not for themselves but for others." This oft-quoted assertion by the eminent English jurist has often led to extreme interpretations of... | |
 | Gavin I. Langmuir - 1996 - 440 sivua
...bore no resemblance to that of serfs in England. A Jew, indeed, can have nothing of his own because whatever he acquires he acquires not for himself but for the king, because they live not for themselves but for others, and so they acquire for others and not for themselves.... | |
 | Robin R. Mundill - 1998 - 372 sivua
...1961, pp. 109-11; Parkes 1937. view: 'Truly the Jew can have nothing which belongs to himself, because whatever he acquires he acquires not for himself but for the king because they do not live for themselves but each acquires for others and not for themselves.' 74 This... | |
| |
has about the Jew :—he with all that he has belongs to the king. Bracton puts the same thought in these words:— 'The Jew can have nothing that is his own, for whatever he acquires, he acquires, not for himself, but for the king; for the Jews live... 
