Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
A Treatise Upon the Law of Principal and Agent in Contract and Tort
William Evans,J. Claude Bedford
Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2015
accept action agency agent agreed agreement amount appears applied appointed attorney authority Bank becomes behalf bill bind bound broker carry charge circumstances cited claim client commission common considered contract corporation course court dealing debt decided decision deed defendant delegate delivered directed directors duty effect employed entered entitled evidence executed existence express fact factor give given ground hands held implied instructions interest joint judge judgment Justice knowledge land latter liable lien limited Lord Mass master means nature necessary notice opinion owner paid particular party payment performance person plaintiff possession principal purchase question ratification reason received recover reference relation respect rule Sect sell shares ship signed Smith sold solicitor supra taken third tion Torts transaction trustee unless
Sivu 309 - Where two parties have made a contract which one of them has broken, the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally — ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself...
Sivu 42 - If, from the plaintiff's own stating or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa, or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the Court says he has no right to be assisted. It is upon that ground the Court goes; not for the sake of the defendant, but because they will not lend their aid to such a plaintiff.
Sivu 427 - Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt, or other legal chose in action...
Sivu 394 - Thesiger now moved for a rule calling upon the plaintiff to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside...
Sivu 598 - With respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his agent in the course of his master's business, and for his master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong.
Sivu 658 - ... the safety of each depends much on the care and skill with which each other shall perform his appropriate duty, each is an observer of the conduct of the others, can give notice of any misconduct, incapacity, or neglect of duty, and leave the service, if the common employer will not take such precautions, and employ such agents as the safety of the whole party may require.
Sivu 189 - The rule of law is clear, that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Sivu 6 - All contracts, whether by specialty or by simple contract, henceforth entered into by infants for the repayment of money lent or to be lent, or for goods supplied or to be supplied (other than contracts for necessaries), and all accounts stated with infants, shall be absolutely void...
Sivu 42 - The objection that a contract is immoral or illegal as between plaintiff and defendant sounds at all times very ill in the mouth of the defendant. It is not for his sake, however, that the objection is ever allowed : but it is founded in general principles of policy, which the defendant has the advantage of, contrary to the real justice, as between him and the plaintiff, by accident, if I may so say. The principle of public policy is this : Ex dolo malo non oritur actio.
Sivu 293 - Wherever two persons stand in such a relation that, while it continues, confidence is necessarily reposed by one, and the influence which naturally grows out of that confidence is possessed by the other, and this confidence is abused, or the influence is exerted to obtain an advantage at the expense of the confiding party, the person so availing himself of his position will not be permitted to retain the advantage, although the transaction could not have been impeached if no such confidential relation...