Lawrance's Bengal Law Reports: Being Decisions of the High Court at Calcutta, and of Her Majesty's ... Privy Council on Indian Appeals, 1868-75, Nide 111884 |
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
ABDOOL GUNNEY Abdool Kadir Act VIII adoption alleged application Arrah Baboo BAHADOOR brought Bysack Calcutta cause of action Chowdhry Chunder Civil Court claim Collector contended COOMAR costs DABEA DASSEE dated Dayabhaga debutter decision declared decree decree-holder deeds defendant dismissed dispute Doorga Doss Dossee dower Dutt entitled evidence execution fact father Ghose ground heirs held HEYSHAM High Court Hindu law Hossein husband interest issue joint family judgment judgment-debtor jurisdiction Justice Khan KHANUM KOONDOO land Lordships Magistrate Mahomed marriage matter Mitakshara Moore's I. A. mortgage MULLICK MUNDUL Munsif MUSSAMUT NATH Nazir obtained opinion parties peon person petition Phear plaint plaintiff possession potta present suit Principal Sudder Ameen Privy Council proceedings purchase question Rajah Rammoney Ranee recover referred rent respondent revenue Richard Couch Sadut share SHIBESSUREE Singh Small Cause Court special appeal SREEMUTTY Subordinate Judge SURMAH Syud talook unlawful assembly widow zemindar
Suositut otteet
Sivu 452 - From the variety of cases relative to judgments being given in evidence in civil suits, these two deductions seem to follow as generally true: first, that the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is as a plea, a bar, or as evidence, conclusive, between the same parties, upon the same matter, directly in question in another court...
Sivu 305 - Elliott, setting forth the facts as above given, and praying that an account might be taken of what was due to them, and that the goods might be sold to pay it.
Sivu 315 - Upon the best consideration which I have been able to give to all...
Sivu 279 - The property in the soil was never before formally declared to be vested in the landholders, nor were they allowed to transfer such rights as they did possess, or raise money upon the credit of their tenures, without the previous sanction of Government.
Sivu 166 - The Civil Courts shall not take cognizance of any suit brought on a cause of action which shall have been heard and determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction in a former suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they claim.
Sivu 450 - I am of opinion that the decision of the lower Appellate Court ought to...
Sivu 444 - But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment.
Sivu 433 - Council — and who, from the discovery of new matter or evidence which was not within his knowledge, or could not be adduced by him at the time when such decree was passed, or from any other good and sufficient reason...
Sivu 141 - But that a very large sum should become immediately payable, in consequence of the non-payment of a very small sum, and that the former should not be considered as a penalty, appears to be a contradiction in terms...
Sivu 328 - Court that witnesses cannot be sued in a Civil Court for damages, in respect of evidence given by them upon oath in a judicial proceeding. Their Lordships hold this maxim which certainly has been recognized by .all the Courts of this country, to be one based upon principles of public policy. The ground of it is this, that it concerns the public and the administration of justice that witnesses giving their evidence on oath in a Court of Justice should not have before their eyes the fear of being...