 | George Washington Hull - 1807 - 408 sivua
...In a series of equal ratios, the sum of all the antecedents is to the sum of all the consequents an any antecedent is to its consequent. Let a : b= c : d = e :/. Let r = the common ratio, Then r = r> ar>da == or- (1) b '- = r, and c = dr. (2) 7=r, ande=/r.... | |
 | Thomas Sherwin - 1841 - 314 sivua
...Adding these equations q, or Dividing by 6 + d+f+h a-\-c-4-e-\-gac - ' In any series of equal ratios, the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents, as any one of the antecedents is to its consequent. 16. If a : b = c : d, and e :f= g : h, that is, — =... | |
 | Thomas Sherwin - 1841 - 320 sivua
...antecedents, is to the sum or difference of the consequents, as either antecedent is to its consequent ; the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents, as the difference of the antecedents is to the difference of the consequents; also, the sum of the, antecedents... | |
 | Charles William Hackley - 1851 - 536 sivua
...A4 : A4' : : be : be' : : cd : cd', &c. PLANE SAILING. therefore, since by the theory of proportion the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents as any one antecedent is to its consequent, A* : A6' : : A4 + be + cd + &c., : A4' + be' + cd' + >fec. But... | |
 | William Smyth - 1851 - 272 sivua
...have and thus in order, whatever the number of equal ratioS. Therefore, in a series of equal ratios, the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents, as any one antecedent is to its consequent. Let us take next the two proportions If we now multiply these... | |
 | Samuel Alsop - 1856 - 152 sivua
...§1O«5. If any number of like magnitudes be proportionals, one antecedent will be to its consequent as the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents. Let a : Ъ : : с : d : : e :f, then a:b::a-\-c-{-e:b-{-d -)-/• For since a : b : : с : d, and a... | |
 | Adrien Marie Legendre - 1863 - 464 sivua
...shall have, A±PA : B±*-B :: C ±2,0 : 2>±^D; PEOPOSITION XI. THEOEEM. In any continued proportion, the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents, as any antecedent to its corresponding consequent. From the definition of a continued proportion (D. 3), A : B : : 0... | |
 | Olinthus Gregory - 1863 - 482 sivua
...represented by f we shall have - « - * - V - ««• T • - Tj Therefore, in a series of equal ratios, the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents, as any one antecedent is to its consequent. If there be two proportions, as 30 : 1 5 : : 6 : 3, and 2 : 3... | |
 | Edward Brooks - 1868 - 284 sivua
...THEOREM XII. If any number of quantities are in proportion, any antecedent will be to its consequent as the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents. Let A:B:: C: D:\E\F, etc. A : B : : E : F; we have A x .D = S X C, and AXF= B X E; adding to these,... | |
 | Charles Davies - 1872 - 464 sivua
...have, DD* A±*-A : *± P -B :: C±$C : D ± *D; PBOPOSITION XI. THEOREM. In any continued proportion, the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents, as any antecedent to its corresponding consequent. From the definition of a continued proportion (D. 3), A. : B : : C... | |
| |
In a series of equal ratios, the sum of the antecedents is to the sum of the consequents as any antecedent is to its consequent. Let a: b = c: d — e :/= g: h. 
