 The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an Injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending It.  Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah - Sivu 206tekijä(t) Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1908Koko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta
 | 1878 - 442 sivua
...107 Mass. 494; Tent Vs. Thf Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railroad Co. , 49 111. 349. ) The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.... | |
 | 1878 - 680 sivua
...steamboat, without the aid of other causes not reasonably to be expected. Held, no error; the true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1886 - 682 sivua
...Dewey, 107 id. 494 ; Tent v. The Toledo, Peoria and Warsaw Railroad Co., 49 I11. 340. The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for U,e jury. It is not a question of science or of le9al knowled9e. R is to be determined as a fact, in... | |
 | 1900 - 2044 sivua
...4C9, 474. 476, Mr. Justice Strong, who delivered the opinion of the court, said: "The true rule Is that what Is the proximate cause of an Injury Is ordinarily...is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. • • * In the nature of things, there is in every transaction a succession of events more or less... | |
 | 1919 - 2026 sivua
...Justice Strong in Milwaukee, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 474, 24 L. Ed. 256: "The true rule is that what Is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...jury. It is not a question of science or of legal know-lodge. It Is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it." Our... | |
 | 1903 - 1112 sivua
...relies upon it. 9. SAME— PROXIMATE CAUSE— EXISTENCE OF EVIDENCE— DIRKCTING VERDICT. The question, what is the proximate cause of an injury? is ordinarily a question for the jury. But the burden is always on the plaintiff, in an action for personal injury, to show that the negligence... | |
 | 1895 - 2084 sivua
...Judge. JENKINS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts). Without doubt, whether a given act or omission is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for a jury. Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 46Í). This, however, is subject to the well-settled rule that... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1882 - 764 sivua
...supreme court of the United States in M. & St. P. Railway Co.v. Kellogg, supra: " The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the Brown and wife vs. The Chicago, Milwaukee... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1883 - 958 sivua
...Supreme Court of the United States in M. & St. P. Railway Co. v. Ktllogg, supra : " The true rule is that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily...question for the jury. It is not a question of science or legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it."... | |
| |
