Shakespeare, Machiavelli, and Montaigne: Power and Subjectivity from Richard II to Hamlet
The four plays of Shakespeare's Henriad and the slightly later Hamlet brilliantly explore interconnections between political power and interior subjectivity as productions of the newly emerging constellation we call modernity. Hugh Grady argues that for Shakespeare subjectivity was a critical, negative mode of resistance to power--not, as many recent critics have asserted, its abettor.
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
acts aesthetic appearance argued attempt audience become believe Bolingbroke called carnival celebrated central century character clearly complex concepts connection constituted context continually course created critical crucial cultural defined discourse discussed earlier effect Elizabethan England English English studies Essays Essex example Falstaff figure French Greenblatt Hamlet Harry Henry Henry IV human idea identity ideology implied important interpretation John kind King language later least less logic London Machiavellian material meaning moment Montaigne nature never opening Oxford passage perhaps play play's political position possible potential present Prince Hal problem produced qualities question reading reason recent Renaissance represented resistance rhetoric Richard Richard II role scene seems seen sense Shakespeare Shakespearian similar social soliloquy stage studies subjectivity suggest tavern themes theory tradition tragedies true turn understanding University Press values York
Kaikki Kirjat-palvelun tulokset »
Hamlet, Protestantism, and the Mourning of Contingency: Not to be
John E. Curran
Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2006