 ... where the misdescription, although not proceeding from fraud, is in a material and substantial point, so far affecting the subjectmatter of the contract, that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never...  The Law of the Contract of Sale - Sivu 277tekijä(t) Solomon Atkinson - 1853 - 440 sivuaKoko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1903 - 930 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might...not bound to resort to the clause of compensation.' This is a negative proposition, but a pregnant one. If the error is of such consequence that it may... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1835 - 818 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might...purchased the thing which was really the subject of the sale; as in Jones v. Edney, where the subject-matter of the sale was described to be "afree public... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1835 - 816 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that but for such misdescription the purchaser might never have entered into the contract at all, the contract is iltogether avoided, notwithstanding a clause providing that " if, through any mistake,... | |
 | Samuel Vallis Bone - 1839 - 398 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might...purchased the thing which was really the subject of the sale ; as in Jones v. Edney, where the subjectmatter of the sale was described to be a " free public... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1839 - 956 sivua
...substantial point, so fat affecting the subject-mattef of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might...facts, the purchaser may be considered as not having 1838. purchased the thing which was really the subject of the sale." The circumstance of the plaintiffnot... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1839 - 1084 sivua
...subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed, that, tub for such misdescriptinn, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract...altogether, and the purchaser is not bound to resort to theclause of compensation. Under such a state of tacts, the purchaser may be considered as not having... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1841 - 1040 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject-matter of the contract, that it may be reasonably supposed that but for such misdescription the purchaser might...purchased the thing which was really the subject of the sale." And therefore where the misdescription is a material one, the (9) 41 G. 3, c. 109,5.2. chaser... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, James Manning, Thomas Colpitts Granger - 1846 - 1126 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that but for such misdescription, the purchaser might never have entered into the contract at all, the contract is void, notwithstanding a clause providing that, " if through any mistake, the estate... | |
 | Charles Davidson - 1844 - 740 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject-matter of the contract, that it may reasonably be supposed, that, but for such misdescription, the purchaser might...purchased the thing which was really the subject of the sale." Vendor's claim The condition is always so worded, as to allow the vendor to obtain in compensa-... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1845 - 1114 sivua
...substantial point, so far affecting the subject-matter of the contract that it may reasonably be supposed that but for such misdescription the purchaser might never have entered into the contract at all, the contract is altogether avoided, notwithstanding a clause providing that, " if through any mistake,... | |
| |
