An Evaluation of the National Energy Plan: Report to the CongressGeneral Accounting Office, 1977 - 200 sivua |
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
achieve actions additional administration's plan administration's proposal Alaskan oil amount areas automobile billion tons Breeder Reactor cars Clinch River coal coal conversion cogeneration commercial Congress consumers costs crude oil domestic economic effects emissions energy conservation energy data Energy Policy energy resources enrichment environmental equalization tax ERDA ERDA's Evaluation existing policy facilities Fast Breeder Reactor Federal funding GAO believes gas-users tax gasoline consumption geothermal energy Government heating oil impact implemented improve incentives increase industry installation issues leasing legislation LMFBR ment MMB/D National Energy Plan natural gas nuclear fission nuclear powerplants oil and gas oil imports oil prices percent plants pollutants potential problems recommended reduced refund reprocessing research and development residential revenues sector solar energy standards Strategic Petroleum Reserve sulfur dioxide synthetic fuels tax and rebate tax credit tion transportation uranium users tax utilities vanpooling world price
Suositut otteet
Sivu 4 - The creation of the Federal Energy Administration and the Energy Research and Development Administration by the 93d Congress symbolize this fact.
Sivu 1 - Commerce; the Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy and Power, House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce; and the Chairman, Subcommittee on Interior, House Comm.ittee on Appropriations.
Sivu xvii - ... new Department of Energy to house the Energy Research and Development Administration, Federal Energy Administration, Federal Power Commission and a number of satellite operations from the Bureau of Mines, Housing and Urban Development, Interstate Commerce Commission and Commerce. In presenting his outline of a national energy plan containing proposed legislation and other initiatives purporting to solve the nation's energy crisis, the President declared: During the past 3 or 4 years, the United...
Sivu 5-29 - The total cost of making the technology commercial including costs of plant construction, costs of alleviating adverse socio-economic impacts caused by the energy development, and the costs of price supports or further subsidies which may be required. — The price at which energy produced by the technology would have to be sold and the means by which the price would be assimilated by our economic system.
Sivu 7-2 - Federal budget appropriations for the National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development-Independent Agencies are presented.
Sivu 6-19 - ... or the development of the LMFBR will not change this situation. "The most logical course of action is to pursue the LMFBR program on a schedule which recognizes that the program still is in a research and development stage. Not until some point in the future, perhaps 7 to 10 years from now, need a firm decision be made as to whether the Nation will commit itself to the LMFBR as a basic central station energy source. At that time, many of the uncertainties of today should be reduced or eliminated,...
Sivu 6-18 - Issues ~~ Related to the Closing of the Nuclear Fuel Services, Incorporated, Reprocessing Plant at West Valley, New York" (EMD-77-27, March 8,
Sivu 8-4 - New or additional hydroelectric generating capacity at existing dams could be installed at less than the cost of equivalent new coal or nuclear capacity. Many of these sites are small, but could generate 3 to 5 megawatts, and are located near major demand centers currently dependent on imported fuel oil. Installation of additional generating capacity at existing sites could conceivably add as much as 14,000 megawatts to the nation's generating potential. The...
Sivu 2-2 - We believe that it is somewhat incongruous to ask the Congress to establish a set of National Energy Goals, and then propose a National Energy Plan that is not expected to achieve them.
Sivu 3-11 - LOWER AIRLINE COSTS PER PASSENGER ARE POSSIBLE IN THE UNITED STATES AND COULD RESULT IN LOWER FARES: Civil Aeronautics Board, report to the Congress by the Comptroller General of the United States.