Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
The Adjudged Cases on Insanity as a Defence to Crime with Notes
John D. Lawson
Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2020
The Adjudged Cases on Insanity as a Defence to Crime: With Notes (Classic ...
John D. Lawson
Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2017
accused acquit alleged answer appear applied asked authorities believe burden capacity cause character charge circumstances Cited commission committed condition conduct consequences consideration considered contrary convicted counsel court crime criminal deceased defendant deliberate delusion determine disease distinguish doubt drunk drunkenness duty effect error established evidence exception excuse existence express fact follows give given ground guilty held homicide human incapable indictment influence insanity instruction intent intoxication judge judgment jury Justice killing knowledge laboring malice matter mental mind moral murder nature necessary objection offence opinion particular party passion person plea premeditated present presumed presumption principle prisoner prisoner's produced proof proved punishment question reason reasonable doubt reference refused regard responsible result right and wrong rule sane sanity satisfied shown sound sufficient taken tending term testimony tion trial true understand verdict whole wife witness
Sivu 221 - ... to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that at the time of the committing of the act the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Sivu 756 - From a deliberate and premeditated design to effect the death of the person killed, or of another...
Sivu 157 - If the question were to be put as to the knowledge of the accused solely and exclusively with reference to the law of the land, it might tend to confound the jury, by inducing them to believe that an actual knowledge of the law of the land...
Sivu 515 - It is that state of the case, which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of the jurors in that condition that they cannot say they feel an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the truth of the charge.
Sivu 318 - That there were such Creatures as Witches he made no doubt at all; For First, the Scriptures had affirmed so much. Secondly, The wisdom of all Nations had provided Laws against such Persons, which is an Argument of their confidence of such a Crime.
Sivu 172 - ... must be considered in the same situation as to responsibility as if the facts with respect to which the delusion exists were real.
Sivu 156 - Lordships' inquiries are confined to those persons who labour under such partial delusions only, and are not in other respects insane, we are of opinion that, notwithstanding the party accused did the act complained of with a view, under the influence of insane delusion, of redressing or revenging some supposed grievance or injury, or of producing some public benefit, he is nevertheless punishable...
Sivu 870 - ... it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason from disease of the mind as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong. The mode of putting the latter part of the question to the jury on these occasions has generally been, whether the accused at the time of doing the act knew the difference between right and wrong...
Sivu 667 - No act committed by a person while in a state of voluntary intoxication is less criminal by reason of his having been in such condition. But whenever the actual existence of any particular purpose, motive, or intent is a necessary element to constitute any particular species or degree of crime, the jury may take into consideration the fact that the accused was intoxicated at the time, in determining the purpose, motive, or intent with which he committed the act.