It was a principle of the Roman law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England, and the United States, that partnership debts must be paid out of the partnership estate, and private and separate debts out of the private... Commentaries on American Law - Sivu 65tekijä(t) James Kent - 1832Koko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1881 - 748 sivua
...the separate debts. It was a principle of the Roman law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England and the United States,...private and separate estate of the individual partner." 3 Kent's Com. 64,65. The obvious infirmity of the objection Davis t>. Howell. to the rule is, that... | |
| Joseph Story - 1846 - 756 sivua
...the separate debts. It was a principle of the Roman law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England, and the United States, that partnership debts must be paid out of the estate, and there is no solvent partner, joint creditors are permitted to prove against the bankrupt's... | |
| Hiram Denio - 1859 - 652 sivua
...also a principle, fully recognized and acknowledged in this state, that in cases of bankruptcy the partnership debts must be paid out of the partnership...private and separate estate of the individual partner ; and that partnership creditors have no claim on, and cannot resort to the separate estate of either... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1861 - 590 sivua
...the separate debts. It was a principle of the Roman law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England, and the United States,...the individual partner. If the partnership creditors can not obtain payment out of the partnership estate, they can not in equity resort to the separate... | |
| Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1865 - 630 sivua
...was a principle of the Roman law," says Chancellor KENT, " and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England and the United States,...private and separate estate of the individual partner " (3 Kent's Com. 64, 65, marginal). By the same principles of equity jurisprudence, it is expressly... | |
| 1881 - 572 sivua
...on Accounts, 68. " It was a principle of the Roman law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England and the United States,...payment out of the partnership estate they cannot, in equity, resort to the private and separate estate, until private and separate creditors are satisfied,... | |
| 1881 - 572 sivua
...on Accounts, 69. " It was a principle of the Roman law, and it lias been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England and the United States,...payment out of the partnership estate they cannot, in equity, resort to the private and separate estate, until private and separate creditors are satisfied,... | |
| John Collyer - 1878 - 892 sivua
...Wilson v. Conine, 2 Johns. (NY) 280. " It is a principle acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of the United States, that partnership debts must be...partnership estate, and private and separate debts out of tho private and separate estate of the individual partner. If tliepartncr.ship creditors cannot obtain... | |
| Joseph Story - 1881 - 788 sivua
...the separate debts. It was a principle of the Roman law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England, and the United States,...payment out of the partnership estate, they cannot in equity resort to the private and separate estate, until private and separate creditors are satisfied... | |
| Isaac Grant Thompson - 1881 - 896 sivua
...the separate debts It was a principle of the Homau law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England and the United States,...private and separate estate of the individual partner.' 8 Kent Com. 64, 65. The obvious infirmity of the objection to the rule is that it leaves out of consideration... | |
| |