Speech Acts in Literature
Stanford University Press, 2001 - 238 sivua
This book demonstrates the presence of literature within speech act theory and the utility of speech act theory in reading literary works. Though the founding text of speech act theory, J. L. Austin's How to Do Things with Words, repeatedly expels literature from the domain of felicitous speech acts, literature is an indispensable presence within Austin's book. It contains many literary references but also uses as essential tools literary devices of its own: imaginary stories that serve as examples and imaginary dialogues that forestall potential objections. How to Do Things with Words is not the triumphant establishment of a fully elaborated theory of speech acts, but the story of a failure to do that, the story of what Austin calls a "bogging down."
After an introductory chapter that explores Austin's book in detail, the two following chapters show how Jacques Derrida and Paul de Man in different ways challenge Austin's speech act theory generally and his expulsion of literature specifically. Derrida shows that literature cannot be expelled from speech acts rather that what he calls "iterability" means that any speech act may be literature. De Man asserts that speech act theory involves a radical dissociation between the cognitive and positing dimensions of language, what Austin calls language's "constative" and "performative" aspects. Both Derrida and de Man elaborate new speech act theories that form the basis of new notions of responsible and effective politico-ethical decision and action.
The fourth chapter explores the role of strong emotion in effective speech acts through a discussion of passages in Derrida, Wittgenstein, and Austin. The final chapter demonstrates, through close readings of three passages in Proust, the way speech act theory can be employed in an illuminating way in the accurate reading of literary works.
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Paul de Man
Allegory as Speech Act
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
already appear asserts Austin authority beginning believe bogging bring citation cited claim clear comes communication concept constative context course depends Derrida discussion distinction effect essay ethical event example excuse exist expression fact feel felicitous figure force French function given gives hand happens impossible Independence intention ironic irony iterability John kind language later least lecture less Limited Inc literature Man's Marcel marks means mind never once original passage passion pear performative utterance perhaps person philosophical poetry political positing possible present Press problem promise Proust question Rachel reader reading reference relation remains responsibility rhetoric Searle seems sense sentence signature someone speak speech acts speech-act theory statement sure talk telephone theory Things with Words tion true truth turn University voice wants whole writing written