Sivut kuvina

“ such constable, headborough, tithing-man, borsholder, or other peace officer, specially, by his name or names, and notwith

standing the parish, township, hamlet, or place, in which such “ warrant or warrants shall be executed, shall not be the parish, " township, hamlet, or place, for which he shall be constable, “ headborough, tithing-man, or borsholder, or other peace officer;

provided that the same be within the jurisdiction of the justice " or justices, magistrate or magistrates, so granting such warrant “ or warrants, or within the jurisdiction of the justice or justices, “ magistrate or magistrates, by whom any such warrant or war“ rants shall be backed or indorsed.” (a) It may be observed, that if a warrant be directed to several persons, any of them may execute it. (n)

Where an officer endeavouring to execute process is resisted As to the leand killed, the crime will not amount to murder, unless the

gality of the pro

process. cess is legal; but by this is to be understood only that the process, whether by writ or warrant, must not be defective in the frame of it, and must issue in the ordinary course of justice from a court or magistrate having jurisdiction in the case. (o) Therefore, though there may have been error or irregularity in the proceeding previous to the issuing of the process, it will be murder if the sheriff or other officer should be killed in the execution of it; for the officer to whom it is directed must, at his peril, pay obedience to it. (p) And for this reason, if a capias ad satisfaciendum, fieri facias, writ of assistance, or any other writ of the like kind issue, directed to the sheriff, and he or any of his officers be killed in the execution of it, it is sufficient, upon an indictment for this murder, to produce the writ and warrant, without shewing the judgment or decree. (9) But it seems that the writ, as well as the sheriff's warrant to the bailiff, must be produced. (z) So, though the warrant of a Justice of peace be not in strictness lawful, as if it do not express the cause with sufficient particularity; yet, if the matter be within his jurisdiction, the killing of the officer executing the warrant will be murder; for it is not in the power of the officer to dispute the validity of the warrant, if it be under the seal of the Justice. (r) It may be observed also, that in all kinds of process, both civil and criminal, the falsity of the charge contained in such process will afford no matter of alleviation for killing the officer; for every

(a) It has been decided that this signed such process, and the process statute only authorizes constables to was in the name and under the seal of execute the warrants therein men- his superior, and it was process against tioned out of their own parishes, &c. the goods only. but does not compel them to do so. (p) Fost. 311. 1 Hale 457. Gimbert v. Coyney and another, Ex- (9) Rogers's case, Cornwall Sum. cheg. Trin. T. 1825.

Ass. 1735, ruled by Lord Hardwicke. (n) i Hale 459.

Fost. 311, 312. ante, 474. (0) Fost. 311. An attachment is- (z) Kex v. Mead and another, 2 sued, and signed by the county clerk Stark. C. 205, an arrest upon mesne in his own cause, is legal process: for process. it was held, that in issuing it the (r) i Hale 459, 460. It is said, howcounty clerk acted merely in a minis- ever, that this must be understood of terial capacity, and not as judge in a warrant containing all the essential his own cause. Baker's case, 1 Leach. requisites of one. 1 East. P. C. c. 5. 112, He was the only officer who s. 78. p. 310.

man is bound to submit himself to the regular course of justice :(s) and therefore, in the case of an escape warrant, the person executing it was held to be under the special protection of the law, though the warrant had been obtained by gross imposition on the magistrate, and by false information as to the matters suggested in it. (t)

A serjeant at mace in the city of London having authority, according to the custom of the city, by entry in the porter's book at one of the counters, to arrest one Murray for debt, arrested him between five and six in the evening of the 8th November, saying at the same time, “ I arrest you in the King's name, at the “ suit of Master Radford;” but he did not produce his mace: Murray resisted, and one of his companions killed the officer. Upon a special verdict it was urged that the arrest in the night was illegal, that the serjeant should have shewn his mace, and that a custom stated in the verdict to arrest without process first against the goods was illegal: but the objections were overruled; and judgment was given for the King, and one of the prisoners

was executed. (a) Process de- But if the process be defective in the frame of it, as if there be fective in the

a mistake in the name or addition of the person on whom it is to frame of it.

be executed; or if the name of the officer or the party be inserted without authority, and after the issuing of the process; and the officer endeavouring to execute it be killed ; this will amount to no more than manslaughter in the person whose liberty

is so invaded. (u) Of the illega- It appears to have been formerly a very common practice to lity of blank

issue blank warrants, notwithstanding their illegality; a practice warrants. Stockley's

exceedingly reprehensible, and which, in the following case, afcase.

forded, to a desperate and atrocious offender, a shelter from the capital punishment which he well merited, by extenuating his crime of killing the person who assisted in executing the warrant to manslaughter. The prisoner Stockley, about Lady-day 1753, had been arrested by Welch, the deceased, at the suit of one Bourn, but was rescued ; and he afterwards declared, that if Welch offered to arrest him again, he would shoot him. A writ of rescue was made out at the suit of Bourn, and carried to the office of a Mr. Deacle (who acted for the undersheriff of Staffordshire) to have warrants made out upon such writ. The custom of the undersheriff was to deliver to Deacle sometimes blank warrants, sometimes blank pieces of paper, under the seal of the office, to be afterwards filled up as occasion required. Deacle made out a warrant against Stockley upon one of these blank pieces of paper; and delivered it to Welch, who inserted therein the names of Thomas Clewes and William Davil, on the 12th July, 1753. On the 19th of September following, Welch, Davil, Clewes, and one Howard, the person to whom Stockley had declared he would shoot Welch, went to arrest Stockley on this warrant. Clewes and Davil, having the warrant, went into

(s) i East. P.C. c. 5. s. 8. p. 310. (u) i Hale 457. Hawk. P. C. c.

(1) Curtis's case, Fost. 135. And 31. s. 64. Fost. 312. 1 East. P. C. see Fost. 312.

c. 5. s. 78. p.310. Sir Henry Ferrers's (a) M.Allay's case, 9 Co, 65 b. case, Cro. Car, 371.

Stockley's house first, and called for refreshment; but, an alarm being given that Welch was coming, the door was locked : upon which Clewes arrested Stockley on this illegal warrant, who thereupon fell upon Clewes, and thrust him out of doors, but kept Davil within, and beat himn very dangerously, he crying out murder. On hearing this, Welch and Howard endeavoured to get into the house : and Welch broke open the window, and had got one leg iu, when Stockley shot and killed him. Stockley then absconded, and was not apprehended till December, 1771. At the Lent Assizes following he was tried for murder, when the jury expressly found that the deceased attempted to get into the house to assist in the arrest of Stockley. Howard, Clewes, and Davil, being dead, their depositions before the coroner were read, and minutes were taken of the above facts for a special verdict: but, to save expense, the case was referred to the Judges of the King's Bench; who certified that the offence amounted, in point of law, only to manslaughter. (w)

This practice of issuing blank warrants was reprobated in a Other cases as more recent case, where the sheriff having directed a warrant to to the idle.. A. by name, and all his other officers, the name of another of the gality of blank sheriff's officers B. was inserted after the warrant was signed and sealed by the sheriff; and, therefore, an arrest by B. was holden illegal. (x) And in another case it was considered that the arrest was illegal, where the warrant was filled up after it had been sealed. (y) But if the name of the officer be inserted before the warrant is sent out of the sheriff's office, it seems that the arrest will not be illegal, on the ground that the warrant was sealed before the name of the officer was inserted. Banks and Powell had a warrant from the sheriff of Salop upon a writ of possession against the prisoner's house ; and their names were interlined after the warrant was sealed, but before it was sent out of the office. The prisoner refused them admittance; and, on their bursting open the door, shot at Banks, and wounded him severely. Upon an indictment for wilfully shooting, upon the 43 G. 3. c. 58., objection was taken that the warrant gave Banks and Powell no authority, because their names were inserted after it was sealed. But the prisoner having been convicted, and the point reserved for the consideration of the Judges, all who were present (viz. 11) held that the conviction was right. (i) But where a magistrate who kept by him a number of blank warrants ready signed, on being applied to, filled up one of them, and delivered it to the officer, who, in endeavouring to arrest the party, was killed; it was held that this was murder in the person killing the officer, and he was accordingly executed. (z)

It may be proper to remark a circumstance in the preceding case of Stockley, which has been thought to deserve considera

(w) Stockley's case, 1772, Serjeant (i) Rex v. Harris, East. T. 1801, Forster's MS. 1 East. P. C. c. 5. s. 78. MS. Bayley, J. p. 310, 311. The case was so decided (z) PerLord Kenyon, in Rex v. without argument.

the inhabitants of Wiowick, 8 T. R. (2) Housin v. Barrow, 6 T. R. 122. 454, who there mentions it as a case And see a case referred to by Lord determined by the Judges sorue years Kenyon, 6 T. R. 123.

before. (y) Stevenson's case, 19 St. Tr. 846. VOL. I.

2 1

tion, (a) namely, that he had before deliberately resolved upon shooting Welch in case he offered to arrest him again, which in all probability it might be his duty to do. It certainly resembles a former case, where, upon some officers breaking open a shopdoor to execute an escape warrant, the prisoner, who had previously sworn that the first man that entered should be a dead man, killed one of them immediately by a blow with an axe. A few of the Judges to whom this case was referred, were of opinion that this would have been murder, though the warrant had not been legal, and though the officers could not have justified the breaking open the door, upon the grounds of the brutal cruelty of the act, and of the deliberation manifested by the prisoner, who, looking out of a window with the axe in his hand, had sworn, before any attempt to enter the shop, that the first man that did enter should be a dead man. (b) But in another case, prior to either of these, where the cruelty and the deliberation were of a similar kind, the crime was considered as extenuated by the illegality of the officer's proceeding. A bailiff having a warrant to arrest a person upon a capias ad satisfaciendum, came to his house, and gave him notice; upon which the person menaced to shoot him if he did not depart: the bailiff did not depart, but broke open the window to make the arrest; and the person shot him, and killed him. It was holden that this was not murder, because the officer had no right to break the house ; but that it was manslaughter, because the party knew the officer to be a

bailiff. (c) As to notice The parties whose liberty is interfered with must have due of the autho- notice of the officer's business; or their resistance and killing of rity to arrest. such officer will amount only to manslaughter. (d) Thus, where

a bailiff pushed abruptly and violently into a gentleman's chamber early in the morning, in order to arrest him, but did not tell his business, nor use words of arrest, and the party not knowing that the other was an officer, in the first surprise, snatched down a sword, which hung in his room, and killed the bailiff; it was ruled to be manslaughter. (e) But it will be otherwise, if the officer and his business be known ; (f) as where a man said to a bailiff who came to arrest him, “ Stand off, I know you well enough, come at your peril,” and, upon the bailiff taking hold of him, ran the bailiff through the body and killed him, it was held to be murder. (8) This will apply as well to a special bailiff as to a known officer : but where the party does not shew by his conduct that he is acquainted with the officer and his business, material distinctions arise as to notice of a known officer, and one whose authority is only special. With regard to private persons inter: fering, as they may do, in case of sudden affrays, in order to part the combatants, and prevent bloodshed, it is quite necessary that they should give express notice of their friendly intent; other

(a) i East. P. C. c. 5. s. 78. p. 311. (e) i Hale 470, case at Newgate, (6) Curtis's case, 1756. Fost. 135. 1657. And see Kel. 136.

(c) Cook's case, 1 Hale 458. Cro. (f ) Mackally's case, 9 Co. 69. Car. 537. W. Jones 429.

(g) Pew's case, Cro. Car. 183. 1 (d) I Hale 458, et sequ.

i Hawk. Hale 458. P. C. c. 31. 8. 49, 50. Fost. 310.

wise the persons engaged may, in the heat and bustle of the affray, imagine that they come to act as parties. (1)

With regard to such ministers of justice as, in right of their As to notice offices, are conservators of the peace, and in that right alone in- by officers interpose in the case of riots and affrays, it is necessary, in order terposing in to make the offence of killing them amount to murder, that the riots and afparties engaged should have some notice of the intent with which frays. they interpose; for the reason which was mentioned in relation to private persons; lest the parties engaged should, in the heat and bustle of an affray, imagine that they come to take a part in it. (i) But, in these cases, a small matter will amount to a due notification. It is sufficient if the peace be commanded, or the officer, in any other manner, declare with what intent he interposes. Or if the officer be within his proper district, and known, or but generally acknowledged, to bear the office he assumes, the law will presume that the party killing had due notice of his intent; especially, if it be in the daytime. (K) In the night some further notification is necessary; and commanding the peace, or using words of the like import, notifying his business, will be sufficient. (1) Killing a watchman in the execution of his office is not the less murder for being done in the night; and the killing of an officer who arrests on civil process may be murder, though the arrest be made in the night; and in the case of an affray in the night where the constable, or any other person who comes to aid him to keep the peace, is killed, after the constable has commanded in the King's name to the keeping of the peace, such killing will be murder; for though the parties could not discern or know him to be a constable, yet if it were said at the time that he was such officer, resistance was at their peril. (a) Therefore though the saying of a learned Judge, “ that a constable's staff will not make a constable,” is admitted to be true; yet if a minister of justice be present at a riot or affray within his district, and in order to keep the peace produce his staff of office, or any other known ensign of authority, in the daytime when it can be seen, it is conceived that this will be a sufficient notification of the intent with which he interposes; and that, if resistance be made after this notification, and he or any of his assistants killed, it will be murder in every one who joined in such resistance. (m) For it seems, that in the case of a public bailiff, a bailiff juratus et cognitus, acting in his own district, his authority is considered as a matter of notoriety; and, upon this ground, though the warrant by which he was constituted bailiff be demanded, he need not shew it; (n) and it is sufficient if he notify that he is the

(k) Fost. 310, 311.

justice's warrant. 3. Because, after (1) Fost. 310. Kel. 66, 115.

his retreat, and before the man slain, (k) i Hale 460, 461. Fost. 310, 311. he commanded the peace; and, notSo in the case of Sissinghurst-house, withstanding, the rioters fell on and 1 Hale 462, 463, it was resolved, that killed the party. See the case fully there was sufficient notice that it was stated, ante, 451, et sequ. the constable before the man was (!) i Hale 461. Fosl. 311. killed :. Because he was constable (a) 9 Co. 66.a. of the same vill. 2. Because he noti- (m) Fost. 311. fied his business at the door before the (n) i Hale 458, 461, 583. Mackassault, viz. that he came with the ally's case, 9 Co. 69 a. But it is

« EdellinenJatka »