 | United States. Department of State - 1889 - 842 sivua
...the corporate body, and that no averment or evidence to the contrary is admissible for the purposes of withdrawing the suit from the jurisdiction of a court of the Uuited States." The same doctrine is maintained in the cases of Marshall vs. The Baltimore and Ohio... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1862 - 658 sivua
...be presumed to be a suit by or against citizens of the State which ereated the corporate body; and no averment or evidence to the contrary is admissible...the jurisdiction of a court of the United States. 6. A corporation endued with the capacities and faculties it possesses by the co-operating legislation... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1864 - 624 sivua
...practice of corruption and to the use of sinister influences." The Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Marshall v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company present in a strong light the consequences proceeding from such contracts. "Bribes, in the shape of... | |
 | United States. Department of State - 1890 - 832 sivua
...the corporate body, and that no averment or evidence to the contrary is admissible for the purposes of withdrawing the suit from the jurisdiction of a court of the United States." Tho same doctrine is maintained in the cases of Marshall vs. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company... | |
 | United States. Department of State - 1890 - 836 sivua
...the corporate body, and that no averment or evidence to the contrary is admissible for the purposes of withdrawing the suit from the jurisdiction of a court of the United The same doctrine is maintained in the cases of Marshall vs. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company... | |
 | United States. Circuit Courts, Benjamin Vaughan Abbott - 1871 - 648 sivua
...name, must be presumed to be a suit by or against citizens of the State which created the corporation ; and that no averment or evidence to the contrary is...the jurisdiction of a court of the United States. In the case of Cowles v. Mercer County, 7 Wall. 118, 121, the rule is thus stated : "A corporation... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1873 - 630 sivua
...its corporate name, must be presumed to be a suit by or against citizens of the State which creates the corporate body ; and that no averment or evidence...jurisdiction of a court of the United States. The same question was again considered and reaffirmed in the case of Marshall vs. The B. & 6. RR Co., 16... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1878 - 1018 sivua
...citizens of the State which created the corporation ; and that no averment or evidence to the contrary id admissible, for the purpose of withdrawing the suit...the jurisdiction of a court of the United States. In the case of Cowles v. Mercer County, 7 Wall. 118, 121, the rule is thus stated : " A corporation... | |
 | Benjamin Robbins Curtis, George Ticknor Curtis - 1880 - 362 sivua
...suit by or against citizens of the State which created the corporate body, and no averment or denial to the contrary is admissible for the purpose of withdrawing...the jurisdiction of a court of the United States." There is the Roman "fiction." The court first decides the law, presumes all the members are citizens... | |
| |
State, the legal presumption is that its members are citizens of the State in which alone the corporate body has a legal existence ; and that a suit by or against a corporation, in its corporate name, must be presumed to be a suit by or against citizens... 
