Today's American: How Free?Arch Puddington, Thomas O. Melia, Jason Kelly Rowman & Littlefield, 2008 - 289 sivua TodayOs American: How Free? assesses the state of American freedom in the post-9/11 period. Conducted by Freedom House, the study looks at a broad range of rights and liberties, including the electoral process, freedom of the press, counterterrorism policies, corruption, freedom of belief, academic freedom, race relations, immigration, property rights, and equality of opportunity. The study places current problems in their historical context and compares American performance with the state of freedom in Europe. It applies the same rigorous analytical criteria to American freedom as Freedom House applies to other countries in the world in its roster of democracy surveys. The study concludes that the problems that the United States faced prior to 9/11_including racial inequality, problems with the criminal justice system, and weaknesses in the electoral system_present a greater challenge to freedom over the long term than do the civil liberties problems that have emerged with the war on terrorism. |
Sisältö
How Free? | xiii |
The Civil Liberties Implications of Counterterrorism Policies | 1 |
Criminal Justice and Property Rights | 27 |
Despite Challenges a Source of Strength | 57 |
Americas Achilles Heel | 93 |
Still Free and Independent | 119 |
Still a Beacon | 153 |
Withstanding Pressures From Left and Right | 177 |
Equality of Opportunity in an Age of Globalization | 201 |
Needs Repair | 223 |
Money and Politics | 259 |
Author Biographies | 283 |
Reviewer Biographies | 284 |
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Today's American: How Free? Arch Puddington,Thomas O. Melia,Jason Kelly Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2008 |
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
academic freedom action administration allowed Amendment American argue Association authority bill Bush campaign Center challenge citizens civil civil rights Clause concerns Congress Constitution continue controversial corruption countries crimes criminal critics debate decisions decline defendants democracy Democratic Department discrimination districts economic effect efforts election enforcement equal established federal foreign Free funds groups House illegal immigrants important increased individual institutions interest International issue journalists Justice labor legislation liberties limited major measure minorities officials organizations party passed percent policies political population practices President prison problems protection race racial recent religious remains Representatives Republican response result ruled Senate sentences September society speech Supreme Court tion union United University vote voters Washington whites women workers York