« EdellinenJatka »
REM A RKS
On a Late
In a LETTER to a friend.
By 7OHN LELAND, D. D,
Afferted, &c. against The Moral Philosopher.
Hall. M. DCC. XLIV.
[ Price One Shilling. ]
TI is proper to advertise the Reader, that I the Letter now publishd, and another which is to follow it, were written by the Author, some time fince, at the Request of a Friend, before he had seen any of the Answers that have been made to that Pamphlet. After reading some of these Answers, he judg’d it unnecessary to publish these Remarks : But as some Persons, for whose Judgment he has a very great Regard, were of opinion they might fill be of Use, he has consented to the Publication.
ERRAT. P. 8. lin. 31, for Truth read Faith.
In Two Volumes. Price gs. The Second Edition (Revis'd by the Author, and made to refer both to
the Quarto and Oitavo Editions it is an Answer to) of 1. A N Answer to a Book, entitled, Christianity as old as the
A Creation. In Two Parts. Part 1. In which the Author's Account of the Law of Nature is consider'd, and the Scheme is fhew'd to be inconsistent with Reason and with itself, and of ill consequence to the Interests of Virtue and Good of Mankind. Part Il, In which the Authority and Usefulness of the Revelation contain'd in the Sacred Writings of the Old and New Testament are asserted and vindicated against the Objections and Misrepresentations of that Author.
In Two Volumes. Price jos. 68.
The Second Edition corrested, of II. The Divine Authority of the Old and New Testament affert. ed; with a particular Vindication of the Characters of Mofes and the Prophets, our Saviour Jesus Christ and his Apofles, against the unjust Afperfions and falfe Reasonings in both the Volumes of the Moral Philosopher.
Both by John Leland, D, D. The Reverend Dr. Delany, in his Refle&tions on Polygamy, and the Encouragement given to that Practice in the Scriptures of the Old Teftament, &c. speaking of the unreasonable Objections of our mos dern Deists to God's not having sufficiently reveal'd his Will to Mankind; and of their extolling the Light of Nature above that contain’d in the Scriptures, Page 40, says thus : See this pernicious Doctrine, together with many others of like Tendency, clearly and fully confuted in Leland's learned and excellent Answer to Christianity as old as the Creation.
N. B. These four Volumes contain not only an Answer to ChriAianity as old as the Creation, and the Moral Philosopher, but an Explication of several of the most difficult Parts of the Sacred Scrip. tures, and a Defence of Revelation in general against the most confiderable Objections of other Writers.
III. A Paraphrase and Critical Commentary on the Prophecy of Foel: To which are prefix'd two Prefaces ; the first on the Neceffity and Usefulness of a Christian Minister's studying the Propherick Writings, and of the Difficulties that occur'd in the Prosecution of this Work, with the Method taken to furmount them. The fecond contains an Attempt to fix the Chronology when this Prophecy was deliver'd, wherein Kimchi, Lightfoot, Grotius, and other Commentators are shewn to be mistaken. There is also a Table of the Hebrew Words illustrated in the Commentary. 4to. Price 4s. By Samuel Chandler.
IV. The Truth, Inspiration, and Usefulness of the Scripture, asserted and prov'd. In several Discourses on the Second of Timothy ii. 16. Price 45. 6 d. By Benjamin Bennet.
REMARKS on a late Pamphlet, entitled,
Christianity not founded on Argument, &c.
Now send you, according to your Desire, some Remarks on a Pamphlet that has made some noise, and which hath a very odd Title,
Christianity not founded on Argument. It is but very lately that I read it, tho’ it be a considerable Time since it was first published. For, bem sides that I live at a distance from your great Metropolis, I have seen so much of these Gentlemen's Way of Writing, and have met with so little to inform the Understanding, or that can be called fair Reasoning and Argument, that I confess my Curiosity is not much raised by any thing that appears from that Quarter. But upon your acquainting me, that it was represented as a subtil Attack upon Christianity, and desiring my Thoughts upon it, I have read it over with some Care. The way of treating the Subject, and the Turn given to Things, is new and uncommon, the Style Iprightly and agreeable; but upon the most impartial Consideration, I cannot think that Christianity has much to fear from this Gentleman, any more than from those that have gone before him.
He has chosen a Manner of Writing, which, it is probable, he supposed might answer his Purpose ;