Argumentation in Practice
Since the late 1950s the study of argumentation has developed from a marginal part of logic and rhetoric into a genuine interdisciplinary academic discipline. After having first been primarily concerned with creating an adequate philosophical perspective on argumentation, argumentation theorists have gradually shifted their focus of attention to a more immediate concern with the ins and outs of argumentative praxis. What exactly are the characteristics of situated argumentative discourse in different argumentative 'action types'? How is the discourse influenced by institutional and contextual constraints? In what way can prominent cases of argumentative discourse be fruitfully analysed? Argumentation in Practice aims to provide insight into some important facets of argumentative praxis and the different ways in which it can be approached. The first part of this volume, 'Conceptions of problems in argumentative practice', introduces useful theoretical perspectives. The second part, 'Empirical studies of argumentative practice', contains both empirical studies of a general kind and several types of specific case studies.
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
List of contributors
The issue in argumentation practice and theory
Competing demands multiple ideals and the structure
The use of arguments from perceived opposition in U S terrorism policy
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
accept action acts allows amalgame American analysis approach arguing argumentation asked aspects Association audience authority become believe claims communication concept concerns conclusion considered construction context controversy critical cultural debate definition describe developed dialectical dialogue discourse discussion dissociation distinction Eemeren emotional energy event evidence example expressed fact fallacy function further give given ideal important included indicates interaction interesting interpretation issue kind language logical look meaning meeting moves normative notion official opinion original participants particular perspective political position practice pragmatic premises presented Press problem question reasoning References reparations response result rhetorical role rules sense situation speaker speaking specific speech stage standpoint statement strategies suggests talk term theory thesis things tion trial understanding University utterance victims