Principles of the Criminal LawStevens and Haynes, 1884 - 596 sivua |
Kirjan sisältä
Tulokset 1 - 5 kokonaismäärästä 31
Sivu 15
... excuse ; and the intention is an inference of law resulting from the doing the act ( s ) . The law infers that every man must contem- plate the necessary consequences of his own act ( t ) . Here , and everywhere in dealing with malice ...
... excuse ; and the intention is an inference of law resulting from the doing the act ( s ) . The law infers that every man must contem- plate the necessary consequences of his own act ( t ) . Here , and everywhere in dealing with malice ...
Sivu 23
... excuse his act or omission . Insanity before or after the time when he committed or omitted the act , and insane delusions though only partial , may be evidence that the offender was at the time , when he committed or omitted the act ...
... excuse his act or omission . Insanity before or after the time when he committed or omitted the act , and insane delusions though only partial , may be evidence that the offender was at the time , when he committed or omitted the act ...
Sivu 25
... excuse . Drunkenness . - Drunkenness is sometimes termed Drunkenness dementia affectata - acquired madness . A state of voluntary intoxication is not any excuse for crime ( u ) . It is true that the sanctions of the law cannot be sup ...
... excuse . Drunkenness . - Drunkenness is sometimes termed Drunkenness dementia affectata - acquired madness . A state of voluntary intoxication is not any excuse for crime ( u ) . It is true that the sanctions of the law cannot be sup ...
Sivu 26
Seymour Frederick Harris. 1b . Infancy , as an excuse for crime . of drunkenness is never entertained in the criminal law . Though it is no excuse for crime , yet it is some- times an index of the quality of an act . Thus , it may be ...
Seymour Frederick Harris. 1b . Infancy , as an excuse for crime . of drunkenness is never entertained in the criminal law . Though it is no excuse for crime , yet it is some- times an index of the quality of an act . Thus , it may be ...
Sivu 27
... , v . p . 435 . ( a ) A præsumptio juris , v . p . 435 . ( b ) 1 Hale , P. C. 26 , 27 ; v . York's Case , Fost . 70 . ( c ) 4 Bl . 22 . IC . Ignorance , as an excuse for crime . PERSONS CAPABLE OF COMMITTING CRIMES . 27.
... , v . p . 435 . ( a ) A præsumptio juris , v . p . 435 . ( b ) 1 Hale , P. C. 26 , 27 ; v . York's Case , Fost . 70 . ( c ) 4 Bl . 22 . IC . Ignorance , as an excuse for crime . PERSONS CAPABLE OF COMMITTING CRIMES . 27.
Sisältö
90 | |
95 | |
101 | |
120 | |
135 | |
141 | |
143 | |
153 | |
178 | |
184 | |
186 | |
193 | |
233 | |
242 | |
254 | |
261 | |
268 | |
273 | |
286 | |
287 | |
382 | |
386 | |
395 | |
401 | |
431 | |
452 | |
458 | |
467 | |
503 | |
506 | |
525 | |
545 | |
553 | |
554 | |
563 | |
564 | |
577 | |
581 | |
592 | |
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Principles of the Criminal Law: A Concise Exposition of the Nature of Crime ... Seymour Frederick Harris,Aviet Agabeg Esikatselu ei käytettävissä - 2015 |
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
25 Vict accused actual allowed amount appear apply arrest assault attempt authority bail called cause character charge circumstances civil coin committed conviction counsel course court crime criminal death defendant enter evidence examination example exceeding execution extent fact false felony give given ground guilty Ibid imprisonment indictment injury intent issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice killing larceny liable magistrate malice matter ment misdemeanor months murder nature necessary noticed oath object obtained offence officer otherwise owner particular party peace penal servitude person plea possession practice present prisoner proceedings prosecution proved punishable punishable by penal Queen's question receiving record rule sentence sessions statute steal stolen summary taken taking term thing tion treason trial tried unless usually warrant witness writing
Suositut otteet
Sivu 22 - ... to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Sivu 108 - Our sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the act made in the first year of King George, for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God save the King.
Sivu 22 - ... must be considered in the same situation as to responsibility as if the facts with respect to which the delusion exists were real.
Sivu 127 - The purposes of any trade union shall not, by reason merely that they are in restraint of trade, be deemed to be unlawful so as to render any member of such trade union liable to criminal prosecution for conspiracy or otherwise.
Sivu 90 - ... to or for any voter, or to or for any person on behalf of any voter, or to or for any other person, in order to induce such voter to vote or refrain from voting...
Sivu 47 - FOUNDED ON THE INSTITUTES OF JUSTINIAN:. TOGETHER WITH EXAMINATION QUESTIONS SET IN THE UNIVERSITY AND BAR EXAMINATIONS (WITH SOLUTIONS), And Definitions of Leading Terms in the Words of the Principal Authorities.
Sivu 203 - Order, or other Security whatsoever, entitling or evidencing the Title of any Person or Body Corporate to any Share or Interest in any Public Stock or Fund, whether of this Kingdom, or of Great Britain or of Ireland, or of any Foreign State, or in any Fund of any Body Corporate, Company, or Society, or to any Deposit in any Savings...
Sivu 410 - Judge prove adverse, contradict him by other evidence, or, by leave of the Judge, prove that he has made at other times a statement inconsistent with his present testimony ; but before such last-mentioned proof can be given, the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the particular occasion, must be mentioned to the witness, and he must be asked whether or not he has made such statement.
Sivu 410 - A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing, or reduced into writing, relative to the subject-matter of the cause, without such writing being shown to him ; but if it is intended to contradict such witness by the writing, his attention must, before such contradictory proof can be given, be called to those parts of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of so contradicting him...
Sivu 440 - Comparison of a disputed Writing with any Writing proved to the Satisfaction of the Court to be genuine shall be permitted to be made by Witnesses ; and such Writings, and the Evidence of Witnesses respecting the same, may be submitted to the Court and Jury as Evidence of the Genuineness, or otherwise, of the Writing in dispute.