Court of Customs Appeals Reports: Cases Adjudged in the United States Court of Customs Appeals, Nide 12The Court, 1925 |
Kirjan sisältä
Tulokset 1 - 5 kokonaismäärästä 30
Sivu 81
... eo nomine as shellac under free list paragraph 1604 , tariff act of 1922 , rather than as a nonenumerated article under paragraph 1459 . United States Court of Customs Appeals , February 9 , 1924 . APPEAL from Board of United States ...
... eo nomine as shellac under free list paragraph 1604 , tariff act of 1922 , rather than as a nonenumerated article under paragraph 1459 . United States Court of Customs Appeals , February 9 , 1924 . APPEAL from Board of United States ...
Sivu 142
... eo nomine in any tariff act prior to that of 1909. Under paragraph 197 of that act typewriters together with cash registers , jute manufacturing machinery , linotype and all typesetting machines , machine tools , printing presses ...
... eo nomine in any tariff act prior to that of 1909. Under paragraph 197 of that act typewriters together with cash registers , jute manufacturing machinery , linotype and all typesetting machines , machine tools , printing presses ...
Sivu 181
... eo nomine designation in paragraphs 336 and 95 respectively . Such of these articles as are made of metal are not dutiable under paragraph 167 , because that paragraph claims only certain metal articles not specially provided for . 1 ...
... eo nomine designation in paragraphs 336 and 95 respectively . Such of these articles as are made of metal are not dutiable under paragraph 167 , because that paragraph claims only certain metal articles not specially provided for . 1 ...
Sivu 184
... eo nomine elsewhere provided for , citing Rumpp v . United States ( 7 Ct . Cust . Appls . 203 ; T. D. 36507 ) . Applying the eo nomine rule it held the merchandise classifiable and dutiable as already herein appears . Obviously , the ...
... eo nomine elsewhere provided for , citing Rumpp v . United States ( 7 Ct . Cust . Appls . 203 ; T. D. 36507 ) . Applying the eo nomine rule it held the merchandise classifiable and dutiable as already herein appears . Obviously , the ...
Sivu 185
... eo nomine mentioned in paragraph 167 and as the board has correctly found these three articles to be within paragraph 356 , unless eo nomine elsewhere provided for , they should be classified thereunder and assessed for duty at 60 per ...
... eo nomine mentioned in paragraph 167 and as the board has correctly found these three articles to be within paragraph 356 , unless eo nomine elsewhere provided for , they should be classified thereunder and assessed for duty at 60 per ...
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
additional duties amberoid annatto APPEAL from Board applied Appls appraised value Assistant Attorney Associate Judges BARBER beads Board of United camphor cent ad valorem cents per pound centum Charles D chief value claimed classification clothing wool coal-tar collector colors component material Congress contention counsel Court of Customs cresylic acid Cust Customs Appeals decision delivered the opinion dutiable emergency tariff act entered value eo nomine evidence export fact February 9 filed free entry George Bissell Government HATFIELD held Hoppin imported merchandise importer protested intended invoice jewelry judgment Lawrence leather liquidation market value MARTIN ment merchandise milreis Oral argument paragraph 385 Presiding Judge provisions of paragraph question rate of duty reads as follows reappraisement reliquidation samples section 501 shellac single general appraiser SMITH special attorney specially provided statute sugar supra sustained tariff act testimony thereof tion Treasury United States 12 United States Court William W words