the other hand, that, reading the works of Calvin or other eminent persons of the same school, they are convinced that these learned men have stated things in a different proportion than is observed in the word of God; and have said a great deal more concerning reprobation, and the reprobate, or nonelect ("the rest," 1) than the scripture does: may not the modern students of scripture adhere to the apostolical plan, though they deviate from that of Calvin and Beza, and from many even of our own reformers and eminent writers? must they, whether they will or not, subscribe Calvin's whole creed, because they learn from the word of God, many of his doctrines?-Nullius addictus jurare in verba magistri, I must decline doing this, in respect of any uninspired man who ever lived, unless I am convinced that his whole creed is scriptural. It may certainly be proved, that election implies non-election; and those who consider the latter as unfounded do not very consistently hold the former. But it is not any man, or number of men, thinking a doctrine unfounded, that deprives of its foundation, either the doctrine itself, or any of those tenets that are connected with it. The foundation of the doctrine of election is in the holy scriptures, not in the sentiments of men; and this "foundation of God standeth sure," however "the faith" of some may be overthrown."-I am pleased to find his Lordship testify decidedly, that there is no hint in scripture about the wicked being annihilated: indeed there is the most decisive testimony to the contrary. "Their worm "dieth not.' "These shall go away into everlast

66

“ing punishment."I hope that we may amicably argue the point with those who differ from us in opinion, without being numbered among their 'adversaries.'

6

6

"No medium,' says Dr. Davenant, himself a distinguished Calvinist, and of those who at'tended the Synod of Dort, can be assigned, ' either on God's part, betwixt the decrees of predestinating some men, and not predestinating

some others; or on men's part, betwixt men ab'solutely predestinated to the attainment of life 'eternal, and absolutely prætermitted, and left infallibly to fail of the obtainment of eternal life, 'which we call absolute reprobation. As for example, let us suppose the number of mankind to 'be two millions of men; if out of these one 'million only, by the decree of election, be infallibly appointed to eternal life, and these certainly ' and absolutely distinguished from others, not only as to their number, but their persons also; 'who can deny, but that one million also, and those certain as to their persons, are as absolutely comprised under the decree of non-election or reprobation, as the others were under the decree * of election or predestination?' So that,' says 'Dr. Whitby, there is no possibility of asserting ' one of these decrees, without owning the other also; and so whatsoever argument holds good against an absolute decree of reprobation, must ' certainly destroy the opposite decree of absolute election."2

6

Dr. Davenant, a distinguished Calvinist, and

'Matt. xxv. 46.

VOL. VIII.

2 Ref. 255, 256.

N

the other hand, that, reading the works of Calvin or other eminent persons of the same school, they are convinced that these learned men have stated things in a different proportion than is observed in the word of God; and have said a great deal more concerning reprobation, and the reprobate, or nonelect ("the rest," 1) than the scripture does: may not the modern students of scripture adhere to the apostolical plan, though they deviate from that of Calvin and Beza, and from many even of our own reformers and eminent writers? must they, whether they will or not, subscribe Calvin's whole creed, because they learn from the word of God, many of his doctrines?--Nullius addictus jurare in verba magistri, I must decline doing this, in respect of any uninspired man who ever lived, unless I am convinced that his whole creed is scriptural. It may certainly be proved, that election implies non-election; and those who consider the latter as unfounded do not very consistently hold the former. But it is not any man, or number of men, thinking a doctrine unfounded, that deprives of its foundation, either the doctrine itself, or any of those tenets that are connected with it. The foundation of the doctrine of election is in the holy scriptures, not in the sentiments of men; and this" foundation of God standeth sure," however "the faith" of some "may be overthrown."—I am pleased to find his Lordship testify decidedly, that there is no hint in scripture about the wicked being annihilated: indeed there is the most decisive testimony to the contrary. "Their worm "dieth not.' 2 "These shall go away into everlast

''Oλool. Rom. xi. 7.

2

Mark ix. 43--49.

“ing punishment." -I hope that we may amicably argue the point with those who differ from us in opinion, without being numbered among their 'adversaries.'

'No medium,' says Dr. Davenant, himself a distinguished Calvinist, and of those who at'tended the Synod of Dort, can be assigned, ' either on God's part, betwixt the decrees of predestinating some men, and not predestinating 'some others; or on men's part, betwixt men absolutely predestinated to the attainment of life 'eternal, and absolutely prætermitted, and left 'infallibly to fail of the obtainment of eternal life, 'which we call absolute reprobation. As for example, let us suppose the number of mankind to 'be two millions of men; if out of these one 'million only, by the decree of election, be infal'libly appointed to eternal life, and these certainly 'and absolutely distinguished from others, not only as to their number, but their persons also; 'who can deny, but that one million also, and 'those certain as to their persons, are as absolutely comprised under the decree of non-election or reprobation, as the others were under the decree * of election or predestination?' 'So that,' says 'Dr. Whitby, there is no possibility of asserting ' one of these decrees, without owning the other 'also; and so whatsoever argument holds good against an absolute decree of reprobation, must certainly destroy the opposite decree of absolute 'election."'2

Dr. Davenant, a distinguished Calvinist, and 2 Ref. 255, 256.

1 Matt. xxv. 46.

VOL. VIII.

N

Dr. Whitby as distinguished an Anticalvinist, are here introduced as agreeing in the same conclusion: yet, after all, some men are so inconsistent, as to believe election and disbelieve the absolute 'decree of reprobation.' I however have no other objection to either of these statements, except what respects the language. It has been shewn that the decree of election is absolute, and implies an express engagement of God to exert omnipotence in carrying it into effect, by regenerating or new creating unto holiness; by bringing to repentance, faith, love and obedience; by upholding and protecting, and rendering finally victorious; and by bringing to heavenly glory all those whom he has elected. "Whom he did foreknow, he "also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son; that he might be the first "born among many brethren. Moreover, whom "he did predestinate, them he also called; and "whom he called, them he also justified; and "whom he justified, them he also glorified."1 But we find no where in scripture so particular an account given concerning the non-elect. God determined to leave them unregenerate; that is, not to give them what they had no right to. He would do them no wrong, but he would not exert omnipotent power in new creating them to holiness. Thus he determined to leave them to "walk "in their own ways, and to be filled with their "own devices." It was a negative decree; a determination not effectually to interpose; not an absolute decree of reprobation. Granting a pardon to some, out of a company of condemned

66

'Rom. viii. 29, 30. See also Art. xvii.