« EdellinenJatka »
mon law pleading and practice, state prac-, after the date of such license, upon his temtice, conflict of laws, professional ethics, the porary admission, and the clerk shall imfederal statutes relating to the judiciary and mediately notify the secretary of the Oregon to bankruptcy, and the development in the Bar Association of such order: Provided, state of Oregon of the principles of law, as | however, that if such license would expire exemplified by the decisions of its Supreme during any vacation of this court, then, and Court and by statutory enactments. Such in that event, it shall continue in force until examinations shall be conducted in the man the third Monday of the succeeding term ner and according to the method prescribed of this court to be held at Salem. In the by said board. No such applicant shall be event that any objection is made to the final permitted to practice in the courts of this admission of any person so licensed to pracstate, unless at least three members of said tice law in this state, such objection shall board, or the court on appeal from the deci- be made in writing, setting forth the grounds sion of the board, shall deem, such applicant thereof, and shall be filed with the clerk, to be duly qualified as to the requisite char- who shall transmit the same to the said acter, learning and ability. Upon such mo- | board of examiners for their action, which tion of any three members of said board action shall be by them reported to the Susuch applicant shall be admitted subject to preme Court: Provided, however, that the the approval and confirmation of the Su court may, in its discretion, either continue preme Court.
or revoke the temporary license pending
such investigation and report. In case no RULE 41. Attorneys and counselors at law
objection is so made and filed within six and solicitors in chancery who have been ad
months after the making and entry of the mitted to practice in the highest courts of
order granting the temporary license to pracany other state, territory or district, or of
tice, then such applicant at any time after England, her colonies, or dependencies where
the expiration of said six months may, on the common law prevails, and who are other
written motion of three members of said wise qualified, may be admitted to the bar of
board of examiners, unless otherwise ordered this state without examination upon pre
by the court, be permanently admitted to senting their certificate of admission to such
practice law in the courts of this state. courts, accompanied by a petition in writing, verified by the oath of the petitioner, RULE 42. Applicants for admission upon showing (1) where he was first admitted to examination shall pay to the clerk $20.00, practice, all places and the periods of time and upon certificate $30.00 before his examduring which he has practiced as an at- ination. (General Laws of Oregon 1913, torney or counselor at law, and especially page 78.) the place, the period of time, and the court Section 1081, Lord's Oregon Laws, probefore which he last practiced; and (2) | vides: whether or not any proceedings for his dis- "Whenever it appears that a person of barment or suspension have been instituted any other state or country is an attorney or prosecuted at any time or place, and that of the highest court of record in such state he has practiced for at least one year in or country, he may appear as counsel for a some other jurisdiction. Such petition must party in a particular action, suit or proceedalso be accompanied by the certificate of the ing then pending in court, or before a judipresiding judge of the highest court in which cial officer of this state, but not otherwise: he last practiced, or was admitted to prac- Provided, however, that upon proof that he tice, to the effect that the petitioner was in is a person of good moral character, which good standing and trustworthy in his pro may be proved by any evidence satisfactory fession in such jurisdiction, and also the to the court, he may be admitted generally, affidavits of two attorneys of this court by the Supreme Court, as an attorney, in showing that they believe him to be a repu- all respects as if he were a citizen of this table attorney and a person of good moral state, and shall be permitted to practice in character, and setting forth how long a time, all courts of this state: Provided, that the when, and under what circumstances those state or country of which such applicant is making the same have known the petitioner. a resident or citizen admits to its bar, and Such applicant may be licensed to practice to practice in its courts, attorneys who are law for a period of nine months from and citizens of this state."
AMENDMENTS TO RULES
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS
Revised July 6, 1918 The revised rules read the same as shown | No. 21. Registration of Students in Law at 157 Pac. vii, except as to rules 20 and 21, Offices. At the time of entering upon a course which read as follows:
of reading in the office of any attorney, as a
preparation for admission to the bar, the proADMISSION OF ATTORNEYS.
spective applicant shall file a declaration No. 20. Motions-Nonresidents-Fee. Any thereof with the clerk of the Supreme Court, resident of Kansas who was admitted to accompanied by such proofs of good moral practice in the district and inferior courts of
character and preliminary general education this state prior to June 1, 1903, will be admitted to practice in this court, on motion, as are required of an applicant for admisand any practicing attorney of any state or sion to the bar by the rules of the board territory having professional business in this of examiners. If such proofs are approved by court may be admitted for the time and pur- the board, the clerk shall register him as a pose of such business, upon taking the oath law student, upon the payment of a fee of hereinafter set out, or such attorney may be five dollars, which shall be credited upon the heard by permission of the court without twenty-five-dollar payment provided for in formal admission. All motions for the ad- rule 25, whenever the student so registered mission of attorneys must be presented in shall make application for admission to the the morning hour, immediately after the first bar. call of the docket. Each resident attorney, upon being admitted under this rule, shall The rules relating to admission to the bar pay three dollars to the clerk, who shall fur- are the same as set forth at 157 Pac. xi, exnish him a certificate of admission and a cept that in rule V the reference to rule 27 printed copy of the rules.
of the Supreme Court is changed to rule 22. 173 P.
Page Abbott, Welling v. (Utah)..
245 Barnum, Kendrick State Bank v. (Idaho)..1144 Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co., Livingstone Barr, Board of Com’rs of Cleveland County v. (Idaho).... ..1086 v. (Okl.)..
206 A. B. Field & Co. v. Hlaven (Cal. App.).. 108 Barton, Rainbow Oil & Gas Co. v. (Okl.). .1135 Adams v. King (Okl.).. 206 Barzen, Harnish v. (Kan.).
4 Adams, State v. (N. M.). 857 Bashore, Lamberson v. (Cal.).
401 Advocate Pub. Co., Board of Com’rs of Lo Basler, Wood & Tatum Co. v. (Cal. App.). .1109 gan County v. (Colo.). 398 Batchman, Lonnon v. (Kan.).
415 Etna Accident & Liability Co., Hub Hard Bates, Akin v. (Or.)..
889 ware Co. v. (Cal.). 81 Batt v. Stedman (Cal. App.)
99 Aickley, Bond v. (Cal. App.). 483 Battelle, Monson v. (Kan.).
927 Akahori, Penryn Land Co. v. (Cal. App.).. 612 Bauer, Hurt v. (Cal. App.).
601 Akin v. Bates (Or.).. 889 Bazzuro, Croce v. (Cal. App.).
774 Alexander v. Smith (Okl.)
618 Bedingfield v. Bedingfield (Or.). Alexander, Walker v. (Okl.). 439 Bell v. Ford (Okl.).
524 Alison v. Chapman (Cal. App.). 389 | Bell, Henderson v. (Kan.).
1124 Allen, Faulkner v. (Okl.).
.1133 Belland, Collins v. (Cal. App.). Allen, Pullin v. (Cal. App.)., 772 Bellomini y. Roberts (N. M.).
.1035 Alloggi y. Southern Pac. Co. (Cal. App.)...1117 Benn v. Grays Harbor County (Wash.). 632 Alton Mercantile Co. v. Booth Packing Co. Bennett, Catlett v. (Cal. App.).
598 of Baltimore, Md. (Kan.).... ...1074 Bennett, People v. (Cal. App.).
1004 American Surety Co, v. Williams (Okl.)..1132 Benson, Robben v. (Cal. App.).
766 American Surety Co. of New York, Sher Berg, Preuss v. (Wash.).
435 man v. (Cal.)...
161 Big Creek Mining Co., Pelham v. (Idaho) 376 Amussen v. Hansen (Utah). 127 Billings Gas Co., State v. (Mont.).
799 Anderson, Mayer v. (Cal. App.). 174 Birch, Thomas v. (Cal.)..
1102 Amerson v. Neal Institutes Co. (Cal. Bishop v. Foley (Kan.).
289 App.) 779 Bixeman v. Warren (Okl.)
443 Anderson, Watson v. (Cal. App.).
391 Black v. Wichita Union Terminal R. Co. Andrews. State v. (Or.). .1173 (Kan.)
1068 Angst, Morton v. (Cal. App.). 90 Blackwell Lumber Co., Hyatt v. (Idaho)
. 1083 Arcade Building & Realty Co., Matzger v.
Blake y, Craig (Cal. App.).
. 100,7 (Wasb.) 47 Blake v. State (Okl. Cr. App.)
96: Arislin v. King County (Wash.). .1020 Blasdel v. Gower (Okl.)...
644 Armour & ('o. y. R. Rosenberg & Sons Blevins y. Blevins (Cal.).
402 Co. (Cal. App.)....
404 Blunt v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. (Okl.) 050 Arstill v. Hare (Or.)..
571 Board of Coni'rs of Choctaw County, ReinArthur, Hill v. (Wash.). .1092 bart & Donovan Co. v. (Okl.).
818 Ash, Backman v. (Kan.).
920 | Board of Com’rs of Cleveland County v. Assessment of Amazon Fire Ins. Co., In
206 re (Okl.)
655 Board of Com'rs of Logan County v. AdvoAssessment of Conservative Loan Co., In re cate Pub. Co. (Colo.).
654 Board of Com'rs of Love County v. Ward Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., De Hlasque v.
73 Board of ('om'rs of Miami County, Buck v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., Hawks v. (Kan.)
922 | Board of Com’rs of Park County, Greiner Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., Rask v. (Kan.) 1066 v. (Colo.)..
719 Atkinson v. Lusk (Kan.).
914 Board of Education of City of Oswego, LaAtlas Copper Co. of Arizona v. Eyring bette County, State v. (Kan.).
947 Board of Equalization of Le Flore County, Auld v. Starbard (Or.),
Central Coal & Coke Co. v. (Okl.).. 412 Austin. State v. (Wash.). 725 Boes v. Howell (N. M.)..
966 Azevedo, Silva v. (Cal.).
929 Boise Land & Orchard Co., Moore v. (Idaho) 117 Bond v. Aickley (Cal. App.).
483 Baca v. Catron (V. M.)..
862 Bond v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New Backman v. Ash (Kan.) 920 York (Kan.)....
2914 Bailard, In re (Cal.)... 170 Boothe v. Dailey (Kan.)..
283 Baird v. Northern Puc. R, Co. (Wash.). 636 Booth Packing Co. of Baltimore, Md., AlBaird v. Salina Northern R. Co. (Kan.). .1069 ton Mercantile Co. v. (Kan.)..
.1074 Baldwin v. Scott (Colo.). 716 Boyd v. Dexter (Kan.)..
292 Ball v, Northern Pac. R. Co. (Wash.)...1029 Bovd v. Grove (Or.)...
310 Ballard v. Ballard (Okl.)..
524 Bradley, Bradley Co. v. (Cal. App.). .1009 Ballentine, Swandt v. (Kan.).
1011 Ballentine, Swandt v. (Kan.).
536 Bradley, Bradley Co. v. (Cal. App.).
926 Bradley, Bradley Co. v. (Cal. App.)... . 1013 Bally, Germania Fire Ins. Co. of New York Bradley Co. v. Bradley (Cal. App.). 1009 v. (Ariz.)..... .1052 Bradley Co. v. Bradley (Cal. App.)
1011 Bancroft v. Bancroft (Cal.).
579 | Bradley Co. v. Bradley (Cal. App.)......1013 Bancroft v. Bancroft, two cases (Cal.). Bancroft v. Bancroft (Cal.). 582 Brandley v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).
661 585 Brannum, Piqua State Bank v. (Kan.). 1 Barnes v. District Court of Appeal, Second Breen v. Breen (Kan.)
2 Appellate Dist. (Cal.). .1100 Breen, State v. (Nev.).
555 Barnes, Worthman v. (Idaho). 751 | Brewer, Crosbie v. (Okl.).
Page Brewster, Donaldson v. (Wash.).
1018 ('ity and County of Denver, Thomas v. Bricker v. Rollins & Jarecki (Cal.).
396 Briest, Robinson v. (Cal.)..
88 City and County of San Francisco, Keyes v. Bristow v. Central State Bank (Okl.). 221 (Cal.)
475 Brockman v. Rees (Okl.). 525 City of Centralia, Fitzgerald v. (Wash.).
6:31 Brown, Cogswell v. (Wash.).
623 City of La Grande, Wagoner v. (Or.). 30.5 Brown v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. (Cal.).. 403 City of Larned, Glasscock v. (Kan.). 302 Brown, People v. (Cal. App.)..
621 | City of Lewistown, Eby v. (Mont.).. 1163 Brown, Rifle Creek Mercantile Co.
City of Loveland v. Western Light & Power (Colo.).
Co. (Colo.). ...
.1178 Bundy v. Wiscamb (Colo.)
S65 City of Sandpoint, Sandpoint Water & Burdell v. St. Luke's Hospital (Cal. App.)1008 Light Co. v. (Idaho)
972 Burke Grain Co, y. Stinchcomb (Okl.).. 204 City of Seattle, Peterson v. (Wash.) 630 Burles v. Roberts (N. M.). . 1035 City of Socorro v. Cook (N. M.).
682 Burnett v. Trimmell (Kan.) 6 City of Topeka, Frost v. (Kan.)
293 Burns v. State (Wyo.).
55 City of Venice v. Superior Court in and for Burns v. State (Wyo.).
785 Los Angeles County (Cal. App.)... 892 Burr v. Gordon (Okl.).
527 | City of Watts v. Superior Court of CaliforBurraston. Ord v. (l'tah).
132 nia in and for Los Angeles County (Cal. Burritt, Flanigan v. (Nev.). 352 App.)
183 Bushey y. Coffman (Kan.). 341 | Clark, Christin v. (Cal. App.)
109 Buss, Miller v. (Kan.)..
975 Clark, Continental Casualty Co. v. (Okl.).. 45:3 Butler, Cole v. (Kan.). 978 Clark, People v. (Cal. App.)
102 Butte Land & Investment Co, v. Williams Clark v. Spruens (Kan.).
550 | Clark & Henery Const. Co., Lillie v. (Cal. Byrne & McDonnell, Crocker Nat. Bank v. App.)
752 Clark & Henery Const. Co., Wentland v. Byrnes v. Julian (Wash.). 1091 (Cal. App.)
Clayton, National Life Ins. Co. of United
3.30 Calkins, Teagarden v. Mont.).
Clear Lake Power & Improvement Co. v. Callendar, Gem Oil Co. V. (Okl.)...
Chriswell (Idaho)... Calumet Fuel Co. v. Rossi (Colo.).
Clifford v. Groseclose (Okl.).
(Kan.) Campbell's Estate, In re (Utah). 688 | Clowers v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).
372 Carlson Mid-Continent Development Cochran Grocery Co., Cohen v. (Okl.) 012 Co. (Kan.). 910 Coffman, Bushey v. (Kan.)
341 Carlson v. Mock (Wash.).
642 Carmichael, Merchants' Nat. Bank v. (Cal.) 999 | Cole v. Butler (Kan.).
Cohen v. Cochran Grocery Co. (Okl.)
978 Carpenter, Wedman v, (Colo.). 57 | Collins v. Belland (Cal. App.).
001 Carr Coal Mining & Mfg. Co., Terleski v.
Collins, Moore v. (N. MI.)
833 Carroll & Co., Grisham v. (Okl.)
Collins Inv. Co. v. Waide (Okl.).. 448
Colorado Farm Lands Co., Keenan
.1140 (arter, State v. (Utah)..
459 Case Plowworks v. Stewart (Okl.). .1048
Colorado Springs Masonic Bldg. Soc., HorCase Threshing Mach, Co. v. Mosley (Okl.) 208 Combined Amusements Co., Jordan v. (Cal.
ton v. (Colo.)
61 Castillo, Morrison v. (Ariz.).. 417
3.90 Catlett v. Bennett (Cal. App.).
1115 Catron, Baca v. (N. M.).
Connell v. McGahie (Cal. App.)..
862 C. C. Harris Oil Co. v. Standard Construc
Continental Casualty Co. v. Clark (Okl.).. 4.53 tion & Development Co. (Cal.)..
Continental Gin Co., Moore v. (Okl.) 83
809 Cedar Lake Logging Co. v. McKinstry
Cook, City of Socorro v. (N. M.)
522 Central Coal & Coke Co., Zancanelli v.
Corbett v. Spanos (Cal. App.).
981 Corbin, Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. (Washi.) 16 Central Coal & Lumber Co. v. Board of
Corbin, Ziegler v. (Colo.)
91.) Equalization of Le Flore County (Okl.) 442 Cornelius v. Robson (Kan.).
44 Central State Bank, Bristow v. (Okl.).... 221 Cornett v. West (Wash.l. Central Trust Co., Jewell v. (Kan.).. 923 Cornett's Estate, In re (Wash.)
41 Chambers v. Gibson (Cal.)..
372 Chaney, Patterson v. (N. M.).
009 Chapman, Jesse v. (Okl.)..
1041 Cowell Lime & Cement Co., Long v. (Cal. Chartrand, In re (Wash.).
492 Chestnut-Gibbons Grocery Co., Simmons v.
Cowell Lime & Cement Co., Osborn v. (Cal. (Qkl.) 217 App.)
492 Chicago, R, I. & P. R. Co., Blunt r. (Okl.) 656 Cox v. State (Okl.).
415 Chicago, R. 1. & P. R. Co. v. Ward (Okl.) 212 Craig, Blake v. (Cal. App.)
.100.5 Childers v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).
372 Craig v. Crystal Realty Co. (Or.). Chong Ben, State v. (Or.).
258 Crane Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. (Cal. Chong Ben, State v. (Or.). 1173 App.)
494 Christensen v. Christensen (Utah).
38: Crawford v. Seattle, R. & S. R. Co. Christin v. Clark (Cal. App.).. 109 (Wash.)
32 Chriswell, Clear Lake Power & Improve Crawford, State v. (Kan.)
12 ment Co. v. (Idaho).
326 Cress v. State (Okl. Cr. App.)... Citizens' State Bank, Jones v. (Kan.)... 977 Crittenden v. Murphy (Cal. App.).
Cushman Motor Works Co. v. Kelley (Okl.)1042 Ewald v. Hufton (Idaho).
Dailey, Boothe v. (Kan.)
283 Eyring, Atlas Copper Co. of Arizona v.
Daniels, Campbell v. (Okl.)
517 Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheffler
Dryden v. Daly (Or.).
667 Foot, Dickinson v. (Okl.)
Dunlap, Johnson v. (Okl.)
359 Foreman v. Hunter Lumber ('o. (Cal. App.) 105
:50 Forest Mills of British Columbia, Drescher
Fotheringham, Terrill v. (Wash.)
.1163 Franklin Fire Ins. Co., Brown v. (Cal.). . 402
484 Frazier, State y, (Wash.)