Sivut kuvina

their innocent children, but upon their children who hate him, and who deserve to be punished for their hating him.

Sinful children deserve to be punished for their own sins, and God punishes them for their own sins, and the reason he gives for it, is the iniquity of their fathers. Their fathers deserve to be punished for their own iniquity, but God, as the moral governour of the world, sees fit, in some cases, to pass over the iniquity of fathers, and to punish their children for their own iniquity. When both parents and children are sinful, God may punish both, or he may punish the parents and not the children, or the children and not the parents. And this is what he threatens in the reason annexed to the second commandment. He will visit the iniquity of the fathers, not upon themselves, but upon their children, who hate him. This is not punishing innocent children instead of their guilty pa. rents ; but only punishing guilty children for their own sins, instead of punishing guilty parents for their own sins. This is neither an act of justice, nor injustice, but only an act of sovereignty. God has a right to

a act as a sovereign in either punishing, or not punishing mankind for their sins in this world. He may suffer some ungodly parents to prosper all their days in their iniquity ; but not suffer their ungodly children to prosper all their days in their iniquity. He may deny prosperity to some godly parents all their days; but bless their godly children with signal prosperity. This is a state of probation, and not of retribution. Though God never punishes any in this world, who do not deserve to be punished, nor bless any in this world, who do not deserve the tokens of his approbation ; yet he does not bestow signal favors upon all, who are worthy

of the tokens of his peculiar favor, nor punish all who deserve the peculiar tokens of his displeasure. He is not obliged to punish, or reward any of mankind according to their deserts in this world. He delayed, for many years, to punish Amorites, because their iniquity was not full. He delayed to punish the iniquity of the Egyptians, for many years, because their iniquity was not full, until they disregarded the severe judgments sent upon them by the hand of Moses. He delayed to punish the iniquity of his own peculiar people, until they had filled up the measure of their guilt, by crucifying his dearly beloved Son, and then he sunk their eity and their nation in universal ruin. And thus he delays to punish wicked parents, until their more wicked children have filled up the measure of their iniquity, and then he punishes them according to their own desert. This God tells us, in the reason annexed to his second commandment, is the mode of his moral gov. ernment in this world ; and where is the injustice or inconsistency of it? He does not punish any innocent persons, nor any guilty persons for any sins but their

But the truth is, mankind have always been disposed to misunderstand, and to misrepresent the conduct of God, in blessing obedient children for the sake of their obedient parents, and in punishing disobedient children for the sake of their disobedient parents ; which has led them to complain of the wise and holy dispensations of divine providence. Let us now, therefore, hear what God has to say, upon this subject, to explain and justify the rectitude and consistency of his own conduct. If we turn to the eighteenth chapter of Ezekiel, we shall find God fairly discussing and settling this important controversy with his people. Though they had often read the reason annexed to the second commandment, yet they were disposed to misunderstand and misrepresent it. God was now treating them according to his declaration in the second commandment ; for he was visiting the iniquities of their fathers upon them, by causing them to pine away in their own iniquities under his chastising hand. Had it not been for the iniquities of their fathers for a long series of years, he would not have punished them by a seventy years captivity in Babylon for their own sins. But they insinuated, that God was punishing them for their fathers' sins, and not for their own, which they complained of as unequal and inconsistent. God allows that it would be unjust to punish them for their fathers' sins, instead of their own, but at the same time denies, that he had ever done so, or ever would do so. God demands, “What mean ye, that ye use this prov


, erb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge? As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel. Behold, all souls are mine, as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine : the soul that sinneth it shall die.” This God says is right, and proceeds to illustrate it, by several examples. “If a man be just, and do that which is lawful and right---he shall surely live, saith the Lord God.” This is the case of a father, he next puts the case of a son.

“ If this just man beget a son, that is a robber, a shedder of blood, and doeth the like to any one of these things---he shall surely die ; his blood shall be upon him.” He proceeds to put another case. “Now lo, if he (this wicked son) beget a son that seeth all his father's sins,


[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

" Are you

[merged small][ocr errors]

which he hath done, and considereth, and doeth not
such like, he shall not die for the iniquity of his father,
he shall surely live ?” Having prepared the way for it,
God now meets and refutes their great objection against
his conduct. “ Yet ye say, Why ? doth not the son
in fact bear the iniquity of the father ?
not now visiting the iniquity of our fathers upon us their
children, and actually punishing us for our father's sins,
and not for our own ? This God absolutely denies.
" When the son hath done that, which is lawful and
right, and hath kept all my statutes, and hath done
them, he shall surely live. The soul that sinneth, it
shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of
the father neither shall the father bear the iniquity of
the son ; the righteousness of the righteous shall be
upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be
upon him.God illustrates this truth, by different
cases, and declares, that if a righteous man should
tu rn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, he
should die in his iniquity ; or if a wicked man should
turn from his wickedness and become righteous, he
should live. Still God supposes, that the objectors are
not satisfied. “ Yet ye say, the way of the Lord is
not equal. Hear now, O house of Israel, Is not my
way equal ? Are not your ways unequal ?” After
making this appeal to their own consciences, he assures
them that he would in time to come, as he had done in
time past, reward, or punish them according to their
own personal conduct.

“ Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the Lord God. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions ; so iniquity shall not be your ruin.” God here completely refutes the objec

[ocr errors]

tion, which his people made against the rectitude and consistency of his conduct towards them, by showing that he never had and never would punish parents for the sins of their children, nor children for the sins of their parents, as they had supposed and represented. But he does not pretend to say, that he had not visited the iniquity of their fathers upon them, according to the reason he had annexed to his second commandment. For he had actually done it. The long series of their fathers' iniquities was the occasion of his sending them into their long captivity in Babylon. He delayed to punish the nation according to their deserts for a long course of years, until they were ripe for a dreadful national calamity, and then he inflicted that national calamity upon their children, who deserved it for their own sins. The iniquity of their fathers was the occasion, not the cause of their being punished ; just as the sins of those, who killed the prophets, were the occasion, and not the cause of the blood of all the prophets being required of that generation, who crucified the Lord of glory.

God having delayed to punish persecutors, it was then time to punish persecutors according to their deserts. When God blesses obedient children for the sake of their obedient parents, he rewards the children for following the good example of their parents; and when he punishes disobedient children for the sake of their disobedient parent, he punishes them for their own sin in following the wicked example of their parents. In the first case, he does not reward parents for their own obedience ; but rewards children for their own obedience ; which is agreeable to the reason annexed to the

; fifth commandment. “Honour thy father and thy mother that thy days may be long upon the land, which the

« EdellinenJatka »