Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of California, Nide 1Marvin & Hitchcock, 1851 |
Kirjan sisältä
Tulokset 1 - 5 kokonaismäärästä 100
Sivu 16
... question . " The matter in dispute was the recovery of $ 166 80 , and the question is at once suggested whether this court has jurisdic- tion . If it had been intended by the framers of the constitution to give this court jurisdiction ...
... question . " The matter in dispute was the recovery of $ 166 80 , and the question is at once suggested whether this court has jurisdic- tion . If it had been intended by the framers of the constitution to give this court jurisdiction ...
Sivu 20
... question to be tried , not whether Ladd , at the time he charges , was in the quiet and peaceable possession of the premises , and was ousted by Stevenson & Parker , under the illegal order of the alcalde , but whether Stevenson ...
... question to be tried , not whether Ladd , at the time he charges , was in the quiet and peaceable possession of the premises , and was ousted by Stevenson & Parker , under the illegal order of the alcalde , but whether Stevenson ...
Sivu 23
... question is not what was the remedy of respondents , nor what ought to be the decision of the court below upon a trial on the merits . If the appellant was in the quiet enjoyment of actual possession , and was forcibly ousted by the ...
... question is not what was the remedy of respondents , nor what ought to be the decision of the court below upon a trial on the merits . If the appellant was in the quiet enjoyment of actual possession , and was forcibly ousted by the ...
Sivu 29
... question recurs , what rights did he acquire - a title to the whole bark , or only to the mino- rity interest of Illsley ? And these questions involve the inqui- ry , whether the cases of Slaughter and others are to be regard- ed as ...
... question recurs , what rights did he acquire - a title to the whole bark , or only to the mino- rity interest of Illsley ? And these questions involve the inqui- ry , whether the cases of Slaughter and others are to be regard- ed as ...
Sivu 30
... question , which was so elaborately argued at the bar , whether courts of First Instance have admiralty jurisdiction . The question then arises , what was the extent of the rights acquired by Loring under his purchase of the interest of ...
... question , which was so elaborately argued at the bar , whether courts of First Instance have admiralty jurisdiction . The question then arises , what was the extent of the rights acquired by Loring under his purchase of the interest of ...
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet
according action affirmed agent Alcalde alleged amount answer appear application appointed authority BENNETT bill brought California cause charge cited civil claim common law complaint considered constitution contract damages decision defendants delivered determine district court duty effect entered entitled established evidence executed exercise facts favor force give given grant ground held Instance intended interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice land legislature lien matter ment Mexican motion necessary notice objection opinion owner parties person plaintiff portion possession practice premises present proceedings proper proved question reason received record recover referred relation rendered respect respondent rule San Francisco says ship statute sufficient suit sustained taken term testimony tion trial United unless verdict vessel whole witnesses writ
Suositut otteet
Sivu 175 - Judgment may be given for or against one or more of several plaintiffs, and for or against one or more of several defendants; and it may, when the justice of the case requires it, determine the ultimate rights of the parties on each side, as between themselves.
Sivu 245 - ... into the Union of the United States, and be admitted at the proper time (to be judged of by the Congress of the United States) to the enjoyment of all the rights of citizens of the United States, according to the principles of the Constitution; and in the mean time, shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty and property, and secured in the free exercise of their religion without restriction.
Sivu 525 - Every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press.
Sivu 245 - The Mexicans who, in the territories aforesaid, shall not preserve the character of citizens of the Mexican Republic, conformably with what is stipulated in the preceding article, shall be incorporated into the Union of the United States, and be admitted at the proper time (to be judged of by the Congress of the United States...
Sivu 532 - That the printing presses shall be free to every person, who undertakes to examine the proceedings of the legislature or any branch of government: and no law shall ever be made to restrain the right thereof. The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the invaluable rights of man; and every citizen may freely speak, write and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty.
Sivu 172 - If no such objection be taken, either by demurrer or answer, the defendant shall be deemed to have waived the same, excepting only the objection to the jurisdiction of the court, and the objection that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Sivu 244 - Those who shall prefer to remain in the said territories may either retain the title and rights of Mexican citizens, or acquire those of citizens of the United States. But they shall be under the obligation to make their election within one year from the date of the exchange of ratifications of this treaty ; and those who shall remain in the said territories after the expiration of that year, without having declared their intention to retain the character of Mexicans, shall be considered to have...
Sivu 138 - A final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity...
Sivu 16 - SEC. 3. In order that no inconvenience may result to the public service from the taking effect of this Constitution, no...
Sivu 330 - When the parties do not consent, the court may, upon the application of either, or of its own motion, direct a reference in the following cases : 1. When the trial of an issue of fact requires the examination of a long account on either side ; in which case, the referees may be directed to hear and decide the whole issue, or to report upon any specific question of fact involved therein ; 2.