Sivut kuvina
PDF
ePub

none but offending man, which death was effected by his removal from the tree of life; for upon him was death threatened, but not upon any of God's works beside-it being perfectly natural to all animal life from the beginning. Yes, even man had even this mortal tendency; but the tree of life was the grand preventive till he had sinned.

It is a scriptural fact, that God at first blessed the animal creation by saying unto them, Multiply, &c. Upon which principle, therefore, it would not have been necessary that a great many years should have passed away, before each particular kind of animal would, from their perpetual multiplication, have filled up all the space under the whole heaven-the consequence of which would have been a general and particular destruction of all land animals, occasioned by their own numbers. A general crush of all bodies must have succeeded finally, if starvation and disease, engendered by the vastness of their numbers, had not destroyed them sooner.

Next to these, the myriads of the seas, in process of time, would have thrown their scaly billions from the ocean's bottom to the skies, and pushed on all the shores of all the seas, vast banks of putrefying fish!!!! And from aloft, and stretched from pole to pole, the whole heaven would have swarmed with countless clouds of fowl, from where the beasts lay crushed to the highest point where clouds can soar.

From this view we see, if God had not in his wisdom appointed from the beginning animal bodies to be the support of animal life, that the final consequence

We

must have been a total extinction of every kind. ought, therefore, to believe, that as they were pronounced very good at first, so they are still, and that the sin of man cannot possibly have affected either their dispositions or death: And instead of a natural evil, we ought to consider the dissolution of animals a natural good of no small magnitude, and was intended so at first, whether man stood or fell.

But if it should be thought impossible that so great a multiplication of animals could ever have succeeded as to engross all the space of the globe, even if they had never died, let it be relied on that the language of philosophy declares, that from one thistle seed, distinguished by its botanical name, Acanthum vulgare, is competent to produce, in the short space of four years, a progeny sufficiently numerous, not only to completely engross all the space of this globe, but also that of the whole solar system. See Dr. Clark on Gen. 3, 18.

ELEVENTH DIVISION,

Presents arguments designed to confute the opinion, that all the animal creation, nor any part of them, shall arise from the dead at the last day, to be remunerated for their sufferings and death, supposed by some to have been occasioned by the sin of Adam.

When from the bursting tombs the righteous dead shall rise,
To meet their coming Lord descending from the skies,
No howling voice of beast shall mix the holy throng,
Nor bleat of gentler flocks disturb the rapturous song;
For these no blood was shed on Calvary's dreadful cross,
Because when Adam sinn'd they suffer'd then no loss;
And therefore cannot rise, no more than moulder'd trees,
To mount the lofty skies and endless glory sieze.

There are many who have imagined, on account o the first transgression, that the whole animal world have thereby been subjected to death. And that they may be remunerated for this suffering, it is supposed they shall be raised from the dead at the resurrection, but whether at the time of the first resurrection, or the second. I do not know: the assertors of this doctrine have not informed us on this point.

Bb*

This opinion is founded chiefly on the 8th chapter to the Romans, from verse 19 to verse 23, inclusive, where it is stated as follows: For the earnest expectation of the CREATURE waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. Verse 19.

That any person should ever have supposed this CREATURE, which waiteth with such anxiety, can be the animals of creation as well as man, is exceedingly strange; for where is the Scripture, or reason, which can afford ground for belief, that any beast was ever yet anxious for the manifestation of the sons of God, or looked for the coming of Christ as an atonement for sin, or for his kingdom to be set up on earth, which was the thing looked for, and so strongly desired should be manifested by the CREATURE, which is

man.

For the CREATURE was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him, who hath subjected the same in hope. Verse 20. Although the creature man has sinned, and thereby became subjected by the judicial act of God, to the vanity of an evil state, yet we cannot think that Adam, or any other man ever felt willing to be under this bondage of vanity and death; for it is stated that the creature Adam was drove out of Paradise, which strongly implies his unwillingness to go; but he was compelled to submit, for it was the sentence of his God. Thanks be to Him, although he has wisely made us subject to the consequences of our own folly in this life, by removing us, in a seminal sense, from the tree of life, yet hath he subjected the same creature man in hope, through the promised seed,

who is Christ, wno was in due time to be manifested, which is the thing spoken of, and is called the manifestation of the sons of God in the 19th verse.

Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the sons of God. Verse 21. This verse puts the thing still farther from embracing animals in any sense relative to the point; because the delivery there spoken of is to be from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the sons of God. What is this liberty of the sons of God, which is said to be from corruption? Is it not the bringing of the soul from darkness to light, as well as finally the body from the grave? Is it not the final sanctification of the soul, which is its fitness for heaven, and entitles his body also to a glorious resurrection from the dead? Now what natural beast was ever brought from darkness to light, converted and sanctified? If none, then how can they have a part in this glorious liberty, which is emphatically the privilege of the sons of God, who are finally to be raised from the dead, and is the delivery of the creature man from the bondage of his corruption into. life eternal, as it relates both to body and soul.

But if the reader still inclines to believe the animal creation included with the creature man, let him recollect that such a position will give all the praise for the resurrection of animals to the devil; because, it will follow, that if man had not sinned, then beasts, upon that supposition, would not have died, and therefore could not arise from the dead, to be made happy in another life. This last idea, however, is not applicable to the case of man, because sin nor death do not,

« EdellinenJatka »