The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance with their respective constitutional processes, defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the Tight... Essays on Strategy - Sivu 86muokkaaja - 1996 - 231 sivuaKoko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta
| 1979 - 1198 sivua
...in mind. Thus tho Joint Declaration of October 14, 1977, affirms the right of the United States to "defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality," and to "have the right to act against any aggression or threat directed against the Canal or acrainst the... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 1977 - 1558 sivua
...by Americans and Panamanians as "ambiguous." The Statement included the following passages: first, that each of "the two countries shall, in accordance...Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality"; second, that the previous provision "does not mean, nor shall it be interpreted as a right of intervention... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 704 sivua
...the responsibility of insuring that the canal will remain secure and open to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries, according to its respective constitutional procedures, will defend the canal against any threat to... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1978 - 786 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to the ships of all :. nations. The correct interpretation of this principle Is that each of the two parties shall, In accordance with their respective constitutional processes, defend the canal against... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 1978 - 600 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that...defend the canal against any threat to the regime cf neutrality, and consequently shall have the canal or against the peaceful transit of vessels through... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 1978 - 692 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that...constitutional processes, defend the canal against any throat to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the canal or against the peaceful transit... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1978 - 818 sivua
...the question of the right to intervene to guarantee the neutrality of the canal, the document reads : "The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance witli their respective constitutional processes, defend the canal against any threat to the regime... | |
| |