Piilotetut kentät
Teokset Teokset
" The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance with their respective constitutional processes, defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the Tight... "
Essays on Strategy - Sivu 86
muokkaaja - 1996 - 231 sivua
Koko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta

Digest of United States Practice in International Law

1979 - 1198 sivua
...in mind. Thus tho Joint Declaration of October 14, 1977, affirms the right of the United States to "defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality," and to "have the right to act against any aggression or threat directed against the Canal or acrainst the...

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the House Committee on International Relations

United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 1977 - 1558 sivua
...by Americans and Panamanians as "ambiguous." The Statement included the following passages: first, that each of "the two countries shall, in accordance...Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality"; second, that the previous provision "does not mean, nor shall it be interpreted as a right of intervention...

Panama Canal Treaties: Administration witnesses

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1977 - 704 sivua
...the responsibility of insuring that the canal will remain secure and open to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries, according to its respective constitutional procedures, will defend the canal against any threat to...

Panama Canal Treaties: Hearings Before the Committee on Foreign Relations ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1978 - 786 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to the ships of all :. nations. The correct interpretation of this principle Is that each of the two parties shall, In accordance with their respective constitutional processes, defend the canal against...

Panama Canal Treaties (United States Senate Debate), 1977-78: February 27 ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Separation of Powers - 1978 - 1924 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that...defend the canal against any threat to the regime or neutrality, and consequently shall have the right to act against any aggression or threat directed...

Proposed Panama Canal Treaties: Hearings Before the Committee on ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 1978 - 600 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that...defend the canal against any threat to the regime cf neutrality, and consequently shall have the canal or against the peaceful transit of vessels through...

Proposed Panama Canal Treaties: Hearings Before the Committee on ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations - 1978 - 692 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to ships of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that...constitutional processes, defend the canal against any throat to the regime of neutrality, and consequently shall have the canal or against the peaceful transit...

Panama Canal Treaties (United States Senate Debate), 1977-78: March 17 thru ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Separation of Powers - 1979 - 2082 sivua
...responsibility to assure that the Panama Canal will remain open and secure to snipe of all nations. The correct interpretation of this principle is that...in accordance with their respective constitutional process, defend the Canal against any threat to the regime of neutrality and consequently shall have...

Panama Canal Treaty Ramifications: Hearings Before the Subcommittee ..., Osa 1

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. Subcommittee on Panama Canal - 1978 - 292 sivua
...Panama, dated October 14, 1977, to the effect that : • * * each of the two countries shall * » * defend the Canal against any threat to the regime...neutrality, and consequently shall have the right to net against nggtression or threat directed against the Canal or against the peaceful transit of vessels...

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1978 - 818 sivua
...the question of the right to intervene to guarantee the neutrality of the canal, the document reads : "The correct interpretation of this principle is that each of the two countries shall, in accordance witli their respective constitutional processes, defend the canal against any threat to the regime...




  1. Oma kirjastoni
  2. Ohjeet
  3. Tarkennettu haku kirjat-palvelussa