 | United States. Supreme Court - 1824 - 952 sivua
...the act is supposed to be, necessarily, incidental to the power expressly granted to Congress, and implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a State, or to act directly on its system of police. So, if a State, in passing laws on subjects " acknowledged... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Marshall - 1824 - 32 sivua
...supposed to be necessarily incidental to the power expressly granted to congress, and implies no daim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a state, or to act directly on its system of police. So, if a state, in passing laws on subjects acknowledged to... | |
 | New York (State). Legislature. Senate - 1831 - 608 sivua
...State, the act is supposed to be necessarily incidental to the power expressly granted to Congress, and implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a State, or to act directly on its system of police. So, if a State, in passing laws on the subjects acknmcledged... | |
 | James Kent - 1832 - 590 sivua
...the act is supposed to be necessarily incidental to the power expressly granted to Congress, and it implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a state, or to act directly on its system of police. The court construed the word regulate to imply full power... | |
 | John Marshall - 1839 - 762 sivua
...state, the act is supposed to be necessarily incidental to the power expressly granted to congress, and implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a state, or to act directly on its^syjtemofpolice. So, if a state. in passing laws on subjects acknowledged to... | |
 | William Alexander Duer - 1843 - 442 sivua
...to the power expressly granted to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the states, and implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a state, or to act directly on its system of domestic police. So, if a state, in passing laws on subjects acknowledged... | |
 | 1845 - 436 sivua
...to the power expressly granted to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the states, and implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a state, or to act directly on its system of domestic police. So, if a state, in passing laws on subjects acknowledged... | |
 | E. Fitch Smith - 1848 - 1004 sivua
...state, the act is supposed to be necessarily incidental to the power expressly granted to congress, and implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a state, or to act directly on its system of policy. So, if a state, on passing laws on subjects acknowledged to... | |
 | James Kent - 1851 - 706 sivua
...the act is supposed to be necessarily incidental to the power expressly granted to congress, and it implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce of a state, or to act directly on its system of police. The court construed the word regulate to imply full power... | |
 | 1920 - 516 sivua
...v. Ogden, Mr. Chief Justice Marshall, speaking of the commerce clause of the Constitution, says, it "implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce in the state, or to act directly on its system of police," and farther on he speaks of the states'... | |
| |
If congress license vessels to sail from one port to another in the same State, the act is supposed to be, necessarily, incidental to the power expressly granted to congress, and implies no claim of a direct power to regulate the purely internal commerce... 
