Rewriting Shakespeare, Rewriting Ourselves
University of California Press, 18.10.1991 - 228 sivua
Participants in the current debate about the literary canon generally separate the established literary order—of which Shakespeare is the most visible icon—from the emergent minority literatures. In this challenging study, Peter Erickson insists on bringing the two realms together. He asks: what impact does a revision of the literary canon have on Shakespeare's status?
Part One of his book is about Shakespeare on women. In analyses of several Shakespearean works, Erickson discusses Shakespeare's ambivalence about women as a reflection of male anxiety about the cultural authority of Queen Elizabeth. Part Two is about (contemporary) women on Shakespeare. Erickson discusses Adrienne Rich's revision of the very concept of canon and discusses how several African-American women writers (in particular Maya Angelou and Gloria Naylor) have reflected on the ambivalent status of Shakespeare in their worlds.
Erickson here offers a model for multicultural literary criticism and a new conceptual framework with which to discuss issues of identity politics. Rewriting Shakespeare, Rewriting Ourselves makes an important contribution to the national debate about educational policy in the humanities.
Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Rewriting Shakespeare, rewriting ourselvesKäyttäjän arvio - Not Available - Book Verdict
Erickson, who is both a Shakespearean and a feminist scholar, makes a lucid, informative, and challenging contribution to the current debate between traditionalists and advocates of minority ... Lue koko arvostelu
SHAKESPEARES REPRESENTATIONS OF WOMEN
Female Rule Patriarchal Ideology
Refracted Images of Queen Elizabeth in Venus and Adonis and The Rape of Lucrece
The Political Effects of Gender and Class in Alls Well That Ends Well
Gender Genre and Nation in Hamlet
WOMEN WRITERS REPRESENTATIONS OF SHAKESPEARE
Some Versions of Tradition
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
acknowledge action actively All's American analysis Angelou approach authority becomes begins Bertram canon chapter common concept connection context continuity contrast critical cultural direct discussion distinction Dream effect Eliot Elizabeth England English essay Essex expressed father female feminist figure final finds focus force gender gives Hamlet Helena's humanities identity ideology includes involves issue king larger later limited literary literature London male Mama Day Marxism means move Naylor's particular pastoral patriarchal perspective play poem poetry political position possible present problem provides Queen question reading reference relation remains Renaissance response revision Rich Rich's role sense serves Shake Shakespeare shift social society Sources specific status structure suggests tion tradition turn University Press Venus and Adonis voice whole woman women writers York