Science Rules: A Historical Introduction to Scientific Methods

Etukansi
Peter Achinstein
JHU Press, 24.9.2004 - 427 sivua

Is there a universal set of rules for discovering and testing scientific hypotheses? Since the birth of modern science, philosophers, scientists, and other thinkers have wrestled with this fundamental question of scientific practice. Efforts to devise rigorous methods for obtaining scientific knowledge include the twenty-one rules Descartes proposed in his Rules for the Direction of the Mind and the four rules of reasoning that begin the third book of Newton's Principia, and continue today in debates over the very possibility of such rules. Bringing together key primary sources spanning almost four centuries, Science Rules introduces readers to scientific methods that have played a prominent role in the history of scientific practice.

Editor Peter Achinstein includes works by scientists and philosophers of science to offer a new perspective on the nature of scientific reasoning. For each of the methods discussed, he presents the original formulation of the method; selections written by a proponent of the method together with an application to a particular scientific example; and a critical analysis of the method that draws on historical and contemporary sources.

The methods included in this volume are Cartesian rationalism with an application to Descartes' laws of motion; Newton's inductivism and the law of gravity; two versions of hypothetico-deductivism—those of William Whewell and Karl Popper—and the nineteenth-century wave theory of light; Paul Feyerabend's principle of proliferation and Thomas Kuhn's views on scientific values, both of which deny that there are universal rules of method, with an application to Galileo's tower argument. Included also is a famous nineteenth-century debate about scientific reasoning between the hypothetico-deductivist William Whewell and the inductivist John Stuart Mill; and an account of the realism-antirealism dispute about unobservables in science, with a consideration of Perrin's argument for the existence of molecules in the early twentieth century.

 

Sisältö

GENERAL INTRODUCTION I
7
From Principles of Philosophy René Descartes
4A DISCUSSION OF DESCARTES METHODOLOGY 48
2
X
3
viii
THE LAW OF GRAVITY 81
3
COHENS DISCUSSION OF NEWTONS METHODOLOGY 99
9WHEWELLS CRITIQUE OF NEWTONS METHODOLOGY 112
ix
18
VAN FRAASSENS ANTIREALISM 281
17 PERRINS REALISM AND ARGUMENT FOR MOLECULES 298
6
18 SALMONS EMPIRICAL DEFENSE OF REALISM 312
6
19REALISM AND PERRINS ARGUMENT FOR MOLECULES 327
PART V
20 GALILEOS REFUTATION OF THE TOWER ARGUMENT 361
Paul K Feyerabend
4

PART III
3
10YOUNGS WAVE THEORY OF LIGHT 137
IIWHEWELLS HYPOTHETICODEDUCTIVISM 150
POPPERS FALSIFICATIONISM 168
8
14 THE WAVE THEORY OF LIGHT AND THE MILLWHEWELL
PART IV
9
22A CRITIQUE OF FEYERABENDS ANARCHISM 389
23KUHNS REJECTION OF UNIVERSAL RULES 402
24A DISCUSSION OF KUHNS VALUES 412
6
Suggested Further Reading 423
17
Tekijänoikeudet

Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki

Yleiset termit ja lausekkeet

Tietoja kirjailijasta (2004)

Peter Achinstein is a professor of philosophy at the Johns Hopkins University. His previous books include Concepts of Science, Law and Explanation, The Nature of Explanation, Particles and Waves, and The Book of Evidence.

Kirjaluettelon tiedot