TABLE OF THE CASES CITED IN THIS VOLUME. Aberdeen Railway Co. v. Blakie, .425 .572 .599 .561 1 Macq. 461... 377 Adams v. Conover, 87 N. Y. 422.254 Adams v. Glidden, 111 Ind. 528.182 Adams v. La Rose, 75 Ind. 471..219 Adams v. Olive, 57 Ala. 249. Adler v. Sewell, 29 Ind. 598. Aiken v. Bruen, 21 Ind. 137. Albertson v. State, ex rel., 95 Ind. 370.. Albrecht v. C. C. Foster Lumber Co., 126 Ind. 318. Alger v. Thacher, 19 Pick. 51...468 Allen v. Baker, 86 N. C. 91. .435 Allen v. McKean, 1 Sumner, 277.452 Allen v. Wheatley, 3 Black f. 332.188 American Express Co. v. Patterson, 73 Ind. 430... .188 Amos v. Amos, 117 Ind. 19. .64, 90 Amos v. Amos, 117 Ind. 37...63, 90 Anderson v. City of Wellington, 40 Kan. 173. 559 .116 Andrews v. City of Portland, 79 Maine, 484. 55 Anderson v. Hubble, 93 Ind. 570.252, 365,436 .192 App v. State, 90 Ind. 73. .282 Arbuckle v. Swim, 123 Ind. 208.276 Arnold v. Engleman, 103 Ind. 512.. Anon., 3 Atk. 644. .585 Baker v. Baker, 16 Abb. N. C. 293.. .583 Baker v. Groves, 126 Ind. 593... 73 Baker v. Joseph, 16 Cal. 173. .279 Baker v. Kellogg, 29 Ohio St. 663.570 Baker v. Pottmeyer, 75 Ind. 451.467 Ballentine v. Robinson, 46 Pa. St. 177... Baltimore, etc., R. R. Co. v. Fifth Baptist Church, 108 U. S. 317.452 Bank of Ogdensburgh v. Arnold, 5 Paige, 38.. .158 Barnes v. Sammons, 128 Ind. 596.570 Barnes v. Union School Tp., 91 11 .348 .539 .557 205 Ind. 301... Barnett v. Harshbarger, 105 Ind. 410. Barron v. Illinois Central R. R. Co., 1 Bissell, 453.. Barthet v. City of New Orleans, 24 Fed. Rep. 563.. .116 Barton v. McWhiney, 85 Ind. 481. 149 Bass v. Doerman, 112 Ind. 390..598 Bass v. Fontleroy, 11 Tex. 698..343 Bass Foundry, etc., Works v. Board, etc., 115 Ind. 234.. .565 Baumgartner v. Hasty, 100 Ind. 575. Beard v. Dennis, 6 Ind. 200.....468 Becket v. Sterrett, 4 Blackf. 499.283 Bennett v. Bennett, 116 N. Y. 584.583 Bennett v. Mattingly, 110 Ind. 197... .585 Berkshire v. Shultz, 25 Ind. 523.473 Berkshire v. Young, 45 Ind. 461.546 Berridge v. Banks, 125 Ind. 561..479 Bethune v. Dozier, 10 Ga. 235...570 Bibler v. Walker, 69 Ind. 362...459 Bifield v. Taylor, 1 Beat. 91. .220 Bills v. City of Goshen, 117 Ind. 221. .115 Bitters v. Board, etc., 81 Ind. 125.539 Blanc v. Murray, 36 La. Ann. 162. .204 .271 Blizzard v. Riley, 83 Ind. 300...361 57 481 Blanchard v. Tyler, 12 Mich. 339.436 | Buntin v. Hooper, 59 Ind. 589. .277 Burk v. Taylor, 103 Ind. 399. .431 Burke v. Ballam, 57 Cal. 594. 70 Burkhart v. Gladish, 123 Ind. 337.. Burnet v. Trustees, etc., 50 Ind. 251... Burton v. Ferguson, 69 Ind. 486.223 Busenbarke v. Ramsey, 53 Ind. 499.. .244 Buser v. Shepard, 107 Ind. 417..227 Butler v. Roberts, 118 Ind. 481.470, 99 591.. 42 562 97 109. Board, etc., v. Mineral Point R. R. Co., 24 Wis. 93... .220 Board, etc., v. Senn, 117 Ind. 410. 72 Board, etc., v. Whittaker, 81 Ind. 297.. Board of Trustees, etc., v. State, Callanan v. Shaw, 19 Iowa, 183.175, 14 Howard, 268.. .449 180 Bodine v. Moore, 18 N. Y. 347. .225 | Campbell v. Board, etc., 115 Ind. Boone v. Mitchell, 33 Iowa, 45. .240 Bott v. Barr, 95 Ind. 243. ..546 Bowen v. Swander, 121 Ind. 164. 65, 550 Bowling v. Burton, 101 N. C. 176.254 'Bowlus v. Brier, 87 Ind. 391....293 Bowne v. Mellor, 6 Hill, 496. .426 Bowser v. Bliss, 7 Blackf. 344...468 Boyce v. Fitzpatrick, 80 Ind. 526,337 Braden v. McNutt, 114 Ind. 214. 43 Bradford v. School Town, etc., .178 42 .599 Brinkmeyer v. City of Evansville, Bruce v. Bissell, 119 Ind. 525. 225 Campbell v. Brackenridge, 8 .365 Campbell v. R. R. Co., 1 Woods, 376... .220 Campbell v. Swasey, 12 Ind. 70.342 Campbell v. Watson, 8 Ohio, 500.220 Capper v. Louisville, etc., R. W. .264 .101 57 .516 Co, 103 Ind. 305.. Carr v. State, ex rel., 127 Ind. 204.. Carroll v. Siebenthaler, 37 Cal. 193.. Carter v. Ford, etc., Co., 85 Ind. 180.. .377 Carver v. Carver, 77 Ind. 498...429 Carver v. Louthain, 38 Ind. 530.572 Cass County v. Johnson, 5 Otto, 369.. Caskey v. City of Greensburgh, 78 Ind. 233. .467 Caylor v. Thorn, 125 Ind. 201...547 Chapell v. Shuee,117 Ind. 481.481,565 Chase v. Cheney, 10 Am. Law Reg. 295. Chicago, etc., R. W. Co. v. Bayfield, 37 Mich. 205. Chicago, etc., R. W. Co. v. Summers, 113 1nd. 10.. Choctaw Nation v. United States, 119 U. S. 1... Churchill v. Lewis, 17 Abb. N. C. 226 517 .334 .431 198 .583 Citizens Ins. Co. v. Harris, 108 | Coe v. Schultz, 47 Barb. 64.....212 Ind. 392.. .122 City Council, etc., v. Louisville, | Coffin v. State, ex rel., 7 Ind. 157.302 .594 116 City of Crawfordsville v. Boots, 76 Ind. 32.... .471 .361 City of Evansville v. Page, 23 594 City of Fort Wayne v. Cody, 43 Colt v. McConnell, 116 Ind. 249.470 42 nold, 31 Ind. 174.. 265 City of Goshen v. Myers, 119 Columbus, etc., R. W. Co. v. Bra 556 den, 110 Ind. 558.. 324 187.. Conklin v. Smith, 7 Ind. 107. Connecticut, etc., Ins. Co. v. Cushman, 108 U. S. 51....161, 229, 575 Connelly v. Dickson, 76 Ind. 440.. Connitt v. Reformed, etc.,Church, 54 N. Y. 551.. 513 Connors v. State, 117 Ind. 347...295 Conway v. Campbell, 38 Mo. App. 473.. .570 Cooter v. Baston, 89 Ind. 185. .231 Corcoran v. Chesapeake, etc., Co., 275 135 158, 379 .205 94 U. S. 741. 220 .205 Clark v. City of South Bend, 85 437 .570 467 474 Erwin v. Gamer, 108 Ind. 488..128 Essig v. Lower, 120 Ind, 239. .147 Ethel v. Batchelder, 90 Ind. 520.148 Evans v. Pence, 78 Ind. 439. Evans v. State, 67 Ind. 68. Evansville, etc., Co. v. State, ex rel, 73 Ind. 219 574 Everroad v. Gabbert, 83 Ind. 489.188 ..367 ..588 Daken v. Williams, 17 Wendell, 447... Dane v. Cordnan, 24 Cal. 157...570 | Daniels v. Tearney, 102 U. S.415.427 Davidson v. Bates, 111 Ind. 391. 64 Davidson v. Hutchins, 112 Ind. 322. 64 Davidson v. Koehler,76 Ind. 398. 64, 532 Davis v. Newcomb, 72 Ind. 413. .161 Davis v. Rupe, 114 Ind. 588. 161,180, 229, 575 Day v. School City of Huntington, 78 Ind. 280. Dayharsh v. Hannibal, etc., R. R. Co., 103 Mo. 570. Deacon v. Powers, 57 Ind. 489. .159 De Hart v. Aper, 107 Ind. 460..588 Deller v. Hofferberth, 127 Ind. 414.. 475 Denson v. Mitchell, 26 Ala. 360. 87 Dequindre v. Williams, 31 Ind. 444.. 276 .272 87 .532 Dick v. Mullins, 128 Ind. 365. .470 Dockerty v. Hutson,125 Ind. 102.418 Dodds v. Vannoy, 61 Ind. 89. 588 Doe v.Considine,6 Wall.458(475). 64 Doe v. Sparrow, 13 East, 359....260 Doe v. Thorley, 10 East, 438. Dolan v. State, 122 Ind. 141.. Donahoe v. Richards, 38 Maine, 379. Douglass v. State, ex rel., 31 Ind. 429. Downey v. Washburn,79 Ind.242.122 Downie v. Buennagel,94 Ind.228. 87 Doyal v. Landes, 119 Ind. 479. .470 Duffies v. Duffies, 31 Cent. L. J. 29 418 33 57 586 Duffy v. Shockey, 11 Ind. 70 .467 Dugan v. Vattier, 3 Blackf. 245.436 Dunning v. Rogers, 69 Ind. 272.598 Dwenger v. Geary, 113 Ind. 106.513 .200 583 302 Ford v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 110 Elston v. Castor, 101 Ind. 426. 225 Giles v. Little, 104 U. S. 291. Given v. Wright, 117 U. S. 648.197 Glidewell v. Daggy, 21 Ind. 95..278 Godfrey v. Wilson, 70 Ind. 50...122 Goodell v. Starr, 127 Ind. 198. 147 Goodhue v. Daniels, 54 Iowa, 19.180 Goodwin v. Fox, 120 U. S. 775..275 Goss v. Meadows, 78 Ind. 528...224 Goudie v. Johnston,109 Ind.427. 91 Green v. Stobo, 118 Ind. 332.226,574 Greene v. Doane, 57 Ind. 186. 109. Harris v. Carpenter, 109 Ind. 254. 576. Haskell v. Manlove, 14 Cal. 54. .228 Hasselman v. Lowe, 70 Ind. 414.225, Hasty v. City of Huntington, 105 Hastings v. Brooker, 98 Ind. 158.533 Hauser v. Roth, 37 Ind. 89. .361 Hays v. Gallion, etc., Co., 29 Ohio.St. 330. 276 220 Hays v. Wilstach, 101 Ind. 100.275 Hazlett v. Sinclair, 76 Ind. 488.437 599 Heaton v. White, 85 Ind. 376...562 Hedderich v. State, 101 Ind. 564.539 Heilman v. Heilman, 129 Ind. 59.259 Hellebush v. Blake, 119 Ind. 349.379 Henderson v. Dickey, 76 Ind. Henderson v. Truitt, 95 Ind. 309.600 Henderson v. Vaulx, 10 Yerger, Hendricks v. Gilchrist, 76 Ind. 228 87 72. Griffin v. Ohio, etc., R. W. Co., Grigsby v. Akin, 128 Ind. 591. .148 572 Hess v. Lowery, 122 Ind. 225. 410 Hiatt v. Ballinger, 59 Ind. 303..278 Higham v. Harris, 108 Ind. 246.600 Hilgers v. Quinney, 51 Wis 62..199 Hill v. Braden, 54 Ind. 72......120 Hines v. Driver, 89 Ind. 339. .278 Hines v. Driver, 100 Ind. 315...280 441 |