Sivut kuvina
PDF
ePub

civil or criminal, in the execution of his duty, or any of his affiftants endeavouring to conferve the peace, or any private perfon endeavouring to fupprefs an affray or apprehend a felon, knowing his authority or the intention with which he interpofes, the law will imply malice, and the killer shall be guilty of murder. And if one intends to do another felony, and undefignedly kills a man, this is alfo murder". Thus if one fhoots at A and miffes him, but kills B, this is murder; because of the previous felonious intent, which the law transfers from one to the other. The fame is the cafe, where one lays poison for A; and B, against whom the prisoner had no malicious intent, takes it, and it kills him; this is likewife murder 1. It were endless to go through all the cafes of homicide, which have been adjudged either exprefly, or impliedly, malicious: these therefore may suffice as a specimen; and we may take it for a general rule, that all homicide is malicious, and of course amounts to murder, unlefs where juftified by the command or permiffion of the law; excused on a principle of accident or self-preservation; or alleviated into manslaughter, by being either the involuntary confequence of fome act, not strictly lawful, or (if voluntary) occafioned by fome fudden and sufficiently violent provocation. And all these circumstances of juftification, excuse, or alleviation, it is incumbent upon the prisoner to make out, to the satisfaction of the court and jury: the latter of whom are to decide whether the circumstances alleged be proved to have actually exifted; the former, how far they extend to take away or mitigate the guilt. For all homicide is prefumed to be malicious, until the contrary appeareth upon evidence 1.

THE punishment of murder, and that of manslaughter, were formerly one and the fame; both having the benefit of clergy: so that none but unlearned perfons, who least knew the guilt of

[blocks in formation]

it, were put to death for this enormous crime. But now, by ftatute 23 Hen. VIII. c. 1. and I Edw.VI. c. 12. the benefit of clergy is taken away from murder though malice prepense. In atrocious cafes it was frequently usual for the court to direct the murderer, after execution, to be hung upon a gibbet in chains, near the place where the fact was committed: but this was no part of the legal judgment; and the like is still sometimes practiced in the cafe of notorious thieves. This, being quite contrary to the exprefs command of the mosaical law', feems to have been borrowed from the civil law; which, befides the terror of the example, gives also another reason for this practice, viz. that it is a comfortable fight to the relations and friends of the deceased ". But now in England, it is enacted by statute 25 Geo. II. c. 37. that the judge, before whom a murderer is convicted, shall in paffing sentence direct him to be executed on the next day but one, (unless the same shall be funday, and then on the monday following) and that his body be delivered to the furgeons to be diffected and anatomized"; and that the judge may direct his body to be afterwards hung in chains, but in no wife to be buried without diffection. And, during the short but awful interval between sentence and execution, the prifoner shall be kept alone, and sustained with only bread and water. But a power is allowed to the judge, upon good and fufficient cause, to respite the execution, and relax the other restraints of this act.

By the Roman law, parricide, or the murder of one's parents or children, was punished in a much feverer manner than any other kind of homicide. After being scourged, the delinquents were fewed up in a leathern fack, with a live dog, a cock, a vi

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

per, and an ape, and so cast into the fea. Solon, it is true, in his laws, made none against parricide; apprehending it impoffible that any one should be guilty of so unnatural a barbarity". And the Perfians, according to Herodotus, entertained the same notion, when they adjudged all perfons who killed their reputed parents to be baftards. And, upon some such reason as this, must we account for the omiffion of an exemplary punishment for this crime in our English laws; which treat it no otherwise than as fimple murder, unless the child was also the servant of his parent.

FOR, though the breach of natural relation is unobserved, yet the breach of civil or ecclefiaftical connexions, when coupled with murder, denominates it a new offence; no less than a fpecies of treason, called parva proditio, or petit treason: which however is nothing else but an aggravated degree of murder'; although, on account of the violation of private allegiance, it is stigmatized as an inferior species of treafon'. And thus, in the antient Gothic conftitution, we find the breach both of natural and civil relations ranked in the same clafs with crimes against the state and the fovereign.

PETIT treason, according to the statute 25 Edw.III. c.2. may happen three ways: by a fervant killing his master, a wife her husband, or an ecclefiaftical person (either secular, or regular) his fuperior, to whom he owes faith and obedience. A fervant who kills his master whom he has left, upon a grudge conceived against him during his service, is guilty of petit treason: for the traiterous intention was hatched while the relation fubfifted between them; and this is only an execution of that intention". So if a wife be divorced a menfa et thoro, ftill the vinculum ma

• Ff. 48.9.9.

P Cic. pro S. Rofcio. §. 25. 91 Hal. P. C. 380.

Foster. 107. 324. 336.

See pag. 75.

"Omnium graviffima cenfetur vis falta

"ab incolis in patriam, fubditis in regem, "liberis in parentes, maritis in uxores, (et "vice versa) fervis in dominos, aut etiam "ab bomine in femet ipfum." Stiernh. de jure Goth. 1. 3. c. 3.

u

1 Hawk. P. C. 89. 1 Hal. P. C. 380. Bb 2 trimonii

trimonii fubfifts; and if she kills fuch divorced husband, she is a traitrefs". And a clergyman is understood to owe canonical obedience, to the bishop who ordained him, to him in whofe diocese he is beneficed, and alfo to the metropolitan of fuch fuffragan or diocesan bishop: and therefore to kill any of thefe is petit treason. As to the reft, whatever has been said, or remains to be observed hereafter, with refpect to wilful murder, is also applicable to the crime of petit treason, which is no other than murder in it's most odious degree: except that the trial shall be as in cafes of high treafon, before the improvements therein made by the statutes of William III; and also except in it's punishment.

THE punishment of petit treason, in a man, is to be drawn and hanged, and, in a woman, to be drawn and burned: the idea of which latter punishment seems to have been handed down to us from the laws of the antient Druids, which condemned a woman to be burned for murdering her husband'; and it is now the usual punishment for all forts of treafons committed by thofe of the female fex b. Perfons guilty of petit treason were first debarred the benefit of clergy by ftatute 12 Hen. VII. c. 7.

w1 Hal. P. C. 381.

x Ibid.

y Foft. 337.

* 1 Hal. P. C. 382. 3 Inft. 311.

a Caefar de bell, Gall. 1. 6. c. 18.
D See

pag. 93.

CHAPTER THE FIFTEENTH.

OF OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSONS OF INDIVIDUALS.

HA

AVING in the preceding chapter confidered the principal crime, or public wrong, that can be committed against a private subject, namely, by destroying his life; I proceed now to enquire into fuch other crimes and misdemesnors, as more peculiarly affect the security of his person, while living.

Or these some are felonious, and in their nature capital; others are fimple misdemefnors, and punishable with a lighter animadverfion. Of the felonies the first is that of mayhem.

I. MAYHEM, mahemium, was in part confidered in the preceding volume, as a civil injury: but it is also looked upon in a criminal light by the law; being an atrocious breach of the king's peace, and an offence tending to deprive him of the aid and assistance of his subjects. For mayhem is properly defined to be, as we may remember, the violently depriving another of the use of such of his members, as may render him the less able in fighting, either to defend himself, or to annoy his adversary. And therefore the cutting off, or difabling, or weakening a man's

a See Vol. III. pag. 121.

b Brit. . 1. c. 25.

1 Hawk. P. C. 111. hand

« EdellinenJatka »