CHAPTER THE TWENTY SEVENTн. OF TRIAL, AND CONVICTION. T HE several methods of trial and conviction of offenders, established by the laws of England, were formerly more numerous than at present, through the superstition of our Saxon ancestors: who, like other northern nations, were extremely addicted to divination; a character, which Tacitus observes of the antient Germans. They therefore invented a confiderable number of methods of purgation or trial, to preserve innocence from the danger of false witnesses, and in consequence of a notion that God would always interpose miraculously, to vindicate the guiltless. I. THE most antient species of trial was that by ordeal; which was peculiarly distinguished by the appellation of judicium Dei; and fometimes vulgaris purgatio, to distinguish it from the canonical purgation, which was by the oath of the party. This was of two forts, either fire-ordeal, or water-ordeal; the former being confined to perfons of higher rank, the latter to the common people. Both these might be performed by deputy : • de mor. Germ. 10. b Mirr. c. 3. §. 23. • Tenetur se purgare is qui accufatur, per Dei judicium; Scilicet, per calidum ferrum, vel per aquam, pro diverfitate conditionis bominum: per ferrum calidum, fi fuerit bome liber; per aquam, fi fuerit rafticus. Glanv. 1.14. г. 1.) but but the principal was to answer for the success of the trial; the deputy only venturing fome corporal pain, for hire, or perhaps for friendshipd. Fire-ordeal was performed either by taking up in the hand, unhurt, a piece of red hot iron, of one, two, or three pounds weight; or else by walking, barefoot, and blindfold, over nine redhot plowshares, laid lengthwife at unequal distances: and if the party escaped being hurt, he was adjudged innocent; but if it happened otherwise, as without collufion it usually did, he was then condemned as guilty. However, by this latter method queen Emma, the mother of Edward the confeffor, is mentioned to have cleared her character, when fufpected of familiarity with Alwyn bishop of Winchester. WATER-ordeal was performed, either by plunging the bare arm up to the elbow in boiling water, and escaping unhurt thereby: or by cafting the person suspected into a river or pond of cold water: and, if he floated therein without any action of swimming, it was deemed an evidence of his guilt; but, if he sunk, he was acquitted. It is easy to trace out the traditional relics of this water-ordeal, in the ignorant barbarity still practifed in many countries to discover witches, by casting them into a pool of water, and drowning them to prove their innocence. And in the Eastern empire the fire-ordeal was used to the fame purpose by the emperor Theodore Lascaris; who, attributing his fickness to magic, caused all those whom he suspected to handle the hot iron: thus joining (as has been well remarked') to the most dubious crime in the world, the most dubious proof of innocence. AND indeed this purgation by ordeal seems to have been very antient, and very universal, in the times of superstitious barbarity. It was known to the antient Greeks: for in the Antigone of Sophocles, a person, suspected by Creon of a misdemesnor, declares himself ready "to handle hot iron and to walk over fire," in order to manifest his innocence; which, the scholiaft tells us, was then a very usual purgation. And Grotius gives us many instances of water-ordeal in Bithynia, Sardinia, and other places. There is also a very peculiar species of water-ordeal, faid to prevail among the Indians on the coast of Malabar; where a person accused of any enormous crime is obliged to swim over a large river abounding with crocodiles, and, if he escapes unhurt, he is reputed innocent. As in Siam, besides the usual methods of fire and water ordeal, both parties are sometimes exposed to the fury of a tiger let loose for that purpose: and, if the beast spares either, that person is accounted innocent; if neither, both are held to be guilty; but if he spares both, the trial is incomplete, and they proceed to a more certain criterion1. ONE cannot but be astonished at the folly and impiety of pronouncing a man guilty, unless he was cleared by a miracle; and of expecting that all the powers of nature should be fufpended, by an immediate interpofition of providence to save the innocent, whenever it was presumptuously required. And yet in England, so late as king John's time, we find grants to the bishops and clergy to use the judicium ferri, aquae, et ignis*. And, both in England and Sweden, the clergy presided at this trial, and it was only performed in the churches or in other confecrated ground: for which Stiernhook' gives the reason; non defuit illis operae et laboris pretium; femper enim ab ejuf“ modi judicio aliquid lucri facerdotibus obveniebat." But, to give it it's due praise, we find the canon law very early declaring againft trial by ordeal, or vulgaris purgatio, as being the fabric of the devil, “ cum fit contra praeceptum Domini, non tentabis “ Dominum Deum tuumm." Upon this authority, though the canons themselves were of no validity in England, it was thought proper (as had been done in Denmark above a century before") to disuse and abolish this trial entirely in our courts of justice, by an act of parliament in 3 Hen. III. according to fir Edward Coke, or rather by an order of the king in council P. 8 ν. 270. On Numb. v. 17. Mod. Univ. Hist. vii. 266. * Spelm. Gloff. 435 I de jure Sueonum, l. 1. c. 8. Decret. part. 2. cauf. 2. qu. 5. dift. 7. Decretal. lib. 3. tit. 50. 1. 9. & Gloff. ibid. canons II. ANOTHER species of purgation, somewhat similar to the former, but probably sprung from a presumptuous abuse of revelation in the ages of dark supersttion, was the corfned, or morsel of execration: being a piece of cheese or bread, of about an ounce in weight, which was confecrated with a form of exorcifm; defiring of the Almighty that it might cause convulfions and paleness, and find no passage, if the man was really guilty; but might turn to health and nourishment, if he was innocent: as the water of jealousy among the Jews was, by God's especial appointment, to cause the belly to swell and the thigh to rot, if the woman was guilty of adultery. This corsned was then given to the suspected person; who at the same time also received the holy facrament: if indeed the corsned was not, as some have suspected, the facramental bread itself; till the subsequent invention of transubstantiation preserved it from profane uses with a more profound respect than formerly. Our historians assure us, that Godwyn, earl of Kent in the reign of king Edward the confeffor, abjuring the death of the king's brother, at last appealed to his corsned, “per buccellam deglutiendam abjuravit'," which stuck in his throat and killed him. This custom has been long fince gradually abolished, though the remembrance of it still subsists in certain phrases of abjuration retained among the common people ". HOWEVER we cannot but remark, that though in European countries this custom most probably arose from an abuse of revealed religion, yet credulity and superstition will, in all ages and in all climates, produce the same or fimilar effects. And therefore we shall not be surprized to find, that in the kingdom of Pegu there still subsists a trial by the corsned, very fimilar to that of our ancestors, only substituting raw rice instead of bread": And, in the kingdom of Monomopata, they have a method of deciding lawsuits equally whimsical and uncertain. The witness for the plaintiff chews the bark of a tree, endued with an emetic quality; which, being fufficiently masticated, is then infused in water, which is given the defendant to drink. If his stomach rejects it, he is condemned: if it stays with him, he is abfolved, unless the plaintiff will drink some of the same water; and, if it stays with him also, the fuit is left undetermined *. THESE two antiquated methods of trial were principally in use among our Saxon ancestors. The next, which still remains in force, though very rarely in use, owes it's introduction among us to the princes of the Norman line. And that is III. THE trial by battel, duel, or single combat: which was another species of presumptuous appeals to providence, under an expectation that heaven would unquestionably give the victory to the innocent or injured party. The nature of this trial in cafes of civil injury, upon issue joined in a writ of right, was fully discussed in the preceding book: to which I have only to add, that the trial by battel may be demanded at the election of the appellee, in either an appeal or an approvement; and that it is carried on with equal folemnity as that on a writ of right: but with this difference, that there each party might hire a champion, but here they must fight in their proper persons. And therefore if the appellant or approver be a woman, a priest, an infant, or ▼Mod. Univ. Hift. vii. 129. * Ibid. xv. 464. See Vol. III. pag. 337. of |