 ... or with knowledge of its invalidity, to cite as authority a decision that has been overruled, or a statute that has been repealed; or in argument to assert as a fact that which has not been proved...  The JAG Journal - Sivu 101947Koko teos - Tietoja tästä kirjasta
 | American Bar Association - 1921 - 1066 sivua
...in those jurisdictions where a side has the opening and closing arguments to mislead his opponent hy concealing or withholding positions in his opening...argument upon which his side then intends to rely. It 1s unprofessional and dishonorahle to deal other than candidly with the facts 1n taking the statements... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1915 - 990 sivua
...its invalidity, to cite as authority a decision that has heen overruled, or a statute that has heen repealed; or in argument to assert as a fact that which has not heen proved, or in those jurisdictions where a side has the opening and closing arguments to mislead... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - 1909 - 254 sivua
...language or the argument of opposing counsel, or the language of a decision or a text-book ; or with the knowledge of its invalidity, to cite as authority...assert as a fact that which has not been proved, or those jurisdictions where a side has the opening and closing arguments to mislead his opponent by concealing... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1978 - 990 sivua
...been overruled or otherwise impaired as a precedent or a statute which has been repealed; or in an argument to assert as a fact that which has not been proved, or to mislead his opponent by concealing or withholding positions in his opening argument upon which his... | |
 | Maryland State Bar Association - 1916 - 328 sivua
...adopted by the American Bar Association say; "It is not candid or fair for the lawyer knowingly, * * * in argument to assert as a fact that which has not been proved," and while in the heat of an oral argument one may make a statement which is not sustained by the record,... | |
 | North Carolina Bar Association - 1910 - 248 sivua
...of a witness, the language or the argument of opposing counsel, or the language of a decision or a text-book ; or with knowledge of its invalidity, to...argument upon which his side then intends to rely. It is unprofessional and dishonorable to deal other than candidly with the facts in taking the statements... | |
 | North Carolina Bar Association - 1915 - 368 sivua
...which has not been proved, or in those jurisdictions where a side has the opening and closing argument to mislead his opponent by concealing or withholding...argument upon which his side then intends to rely. It is unprofessional and dishonorable to deal other than candidly with the facts in taking the statements... | |
 | 1902 - 746 sivua
...of a witness, the language or the argument of opposing counsel, or the language of a decision or a text-book ; or with knowledge of its invalidity, to...argument upon which his side then intends to rely. It is unprofessional and dishonorable to deal other than candidly with the facts in taking the statements... | |
 | 1906 - 688 sivua
...of a witness, the language or the argument of opposing counsel, or the language of a decision or a te'xt-book; or with knowledge of its invalidity, to...argument upon which his side then intends to rely. It is unprofessional and dishonorable to deal other than candidly with the facts in taking the statements... | |
 | 1912 - 260 sivua
...of a witness, the language or the argument of opposing counsel, or the language of a decision or a text-book; or with knowledge of its invalidity, to...argument upon which his side then intends to rely. It is unprofessional and dishonorable to deal other than candidly with the facts in taking the statements... | |
| |
