| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1984 - 48 sivua
...States-China Joint Communique, he stated that, "We will not interfere in this matter [Taiwan question] or prejudice the free choice of, or put pressure on, the people of Taiwan in this matter." On February 28, 1983, Assistant Secretary of State, Paul Wolfowltz, replying to a question raised by... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs - 1987 - 216 sivua
...17 Communique in a way consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act; (4) To regard the Taiwan issue as a matter for the Chinese people, on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, to resolve themselves; and (5) To make clear to both Chinese governments that we have an abiding interest and... | |
| 1997 - 302 sivua
...Relations Act, the US law on this issue. Again, we hope for the resolution of the issue, which is clearly a matter for the Chinese people on both sides of the Taiwan Straits to resolve in a peaceful manner. But we are all also concerned with the peace and stability... | |
| Martin L. Lasater, Peter Kien-hong Yu - 2000 - 376 sivua
...Chinese government to the resolution of the Taiwan issue would continue to be peaceful. He affirmed that the Taiwan question is a matter for the Chinese people, on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, to resolve. The United States would not interfere in this matter or prejudice the free choice of, or put pressure... | |
| Adam W. Clarke - 2001 - 160 sivua
..."two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan," while President Reagan's accompanying statement said that "the Taiwan question is a matter for the Chinese people, on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to resolve." The TRA did not discuss the 7 Eg, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., "A Taiwan Deal," Washington Post, March 8, 1998;... | |
| Barry M. Rubin, Thomas A. Keaney - 2001 - 316 sivua
...Strait serve US interests in the western Pacific region. Shirk pointed out that 'the future of Taiwan is a matter for the Chinese people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to resolve themselves. No Administration has taken a position on how or when they should do so.' This is clearly... | |
| |