Sivut kuvina
PDF
ePub
[ocr errors]

matter indeed is continually changing, and that into ten thousand forms. But that it is changeable does in no wise imply, that it is perishable. The substance may remain one and the same, though under innumerable different forms. It is very possible any portion of matter may be resolved into the atoms of which it was originally composed. But what reason have we to believe, that one of these atoms ever was, or ever will be annihilated? It never can, unless by the uncontrolable power of its Almighty Creator. And is it probable that ever he will exert this power, in unmaking any of the things that he hath made? In this also, God is "not a man that he should repent.' Indeed every creature under heaven does and must continually change its form, which we can now easily account for; as it clearly appears from late discoveries, that ethereal fire enters into the composition of every part of the creation. Now this is essentially edaxrerum. It is the universal menstruum, the dissolver of all things under the Sun. By the force of this, even the strongest, the firmest bodies are dissolved. It appears from the experiment, repeatedly made by the great Lord Bacon, that even diamonds, by a high degree of heat, may be turned into dust. And that in a still higher degree, (strange as it may seem) they will totally flame away. Yea, by this the heavens themselves will be dissolved; "the elements shall melt with fervent heat." But they will only be dissolved; not destroyed: they will melt; but they will not perish. Though they lose their present form, yet not a particle of them will ever lose its existence: but every atom of them will remain under one form or other to all eternity.

8. But still we would enquire, What is this eternity? How shall we pour any light upon this abstruse subject? It cannot be the object of our understanding. And with what comparison shall we compare it? How infinitely does it transcend all these? What are any temporal things placed in comparison with those that are eternal? What is the duration of the long-lived Oak, of the ancient Castle, of Trajan's Pillar, of Pompey's Amphitheatre? What is the

antiquity of the Tuscan Urns, though probably older than the foundation of Rome; yea, of the Pyramids of Egypt, suppose they have remained upwards of three thousand years, when laid in the balance with eternity? It vanishes into nothing. Nay, what is the duration of "the everlasting hills," figuratively so called, which have remained ever since the general Deluge, if not from the foundation of the world, in comparison of eternity? No more than an insignificant cypher. Go further yet. Consider the duration, from the creation of the first-born sons of God, of Michael the Archangel in particular, to the hour when he shall be commissioned to sound his trumpet, and to utter his mighty voice through the vault of heaven, “Arise, ye dead, and come to Judgment!" Is it not a moment, a point, a nothing in comparison of unfathomable eternity? Add to this a thousand, a million of years, add a million of million of "ages, before the mountains were brought forth, or the earth and the round world were made:" what is all this in comparison of that eternity which is past? Is it not less, infinitely less, than a single drop of water to the whole ocean? Yea, immeasurably less than a day, an hour, a moment, to a million of ages. Go back a thousand millions still: yet you are no nearer the beginning of eternity.

9. Are we able to form a more adequate conception of eternity to come? In order to this, let us compare it with the several degrees of duration which we are acquainted with. An Ephemeron Fly lives six hours, from six in the evening till twelve. This is a short life compared to that of a man, which continues threescore or fourscore years. And this itself is short, if it be compared to the nine hundred and sixty-nine years of Methuselah. Yet what are these years, yea, all that have succeeded each other, from the time that the heavens and the earth were erected, to the time when the heavens shall pass away, and the earth with the works of it shall be burnt up, if we compare it to the length of that duration which never shall have an end!

10. In order to illustrate this, a late author has repeated that striking thought of St. Cyprian. Suppose there were

a ball of sand, as large as the globe of earth: suppose a grain of this sand were to be annihilated, reduced to nothing, in a thousand years; yet that whole space of duration, wherein this ball would be annihilating, at the rate of one grain in a thousand years, would bear infinitely less proportion to eternity, duration without end, than a single grain of sand would bear to all the mass.

11. To infix this important point the more deeply in your mind, consider another comparison. Suppose the Ocean to be so enlarged, as to include all the space between the earth and the starry heavens. Suppose a drop of this water to be annihilated once in a thousand years; yet that whole space of duration, wherein this ocean is annihilating, at the rate of one drop in a thousand years, would be infinitely less in proportion to eternity, than one drop of water to that whole ocean.

Look then at those immortal spirits, whether they are in this or the other world. When they shall have lived thousands of thousands of years, yea, millions of millions of ages, their duration will be but just begun they will be only upon the threshold of eternity.

12. But besides this division of eternity into that which is past, and that which is to come, there is another division of eternity, which is of unspeakable importance. That which is to come, as it relates to immortal spirits, is either happy or miserable eternity.

13. See the spirits of the righteous that are already praising God in a happy eternity. We are ready to say, How short will it appear to those who drink of the rivers of pleasure at God's right hand! We are ready to cry out,

"A day without night,

They dwell in his sight,

And Eternity seems as a day!"

But this is only speaking after the manner of men. For the measures of long and short are only applicable to time, which admits of bounds, and not to unbounded duration. This rolls on (according to our low conceptions) with unut

D

terable, inconceivable swiftness; if one would not rather say, it does not roll or move at all, but is one, still immovable ocean. For the inhabitants of heaven " cease not day or night," but "continually cry, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD, the GOD, the ALMIGHTY, who was, and who is, and who is to come!" And when millions of millions of ages are elapsed, their eternity is but just begun.

14. On the other hand, in what condition are those immortal spirits who have made choice of a miserable eternity? I say, made choice: for it is impossible this should be the lot of any creature, but by his own act and deed. The day is coming when every soul will be constrained to acknowledge, in the sight of men and angels,

"No dire decree of thine did seal,

Or fix the' unalterable doom;

Consign my unborn soul to hell,

Or damn me from my mother's womb.'

In what condition will such a spirit be after the sentence is executed, "Depart, ye cursed into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels?" Suppose him to be just now plunged into "the lake of fire burning with brimstone," where they have no rest day or night, but the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever." Why, if we were only to be chained down one day, yea, one hour, in a lake of fire; how amazingly long would one day or one' hour appear! I know not if it would not seem as a thousand years. But (astonishing thought!) after thousands of thousands, he has but just tasted of his bitter cup! After millions of millions, it will be no nearer the end than it was the moment it began.

[ocr errors]

15. What then is he, how foolish, how mad, in how unutterable a degree of distraction, who, seeming to have the understanding of a man, deliberately prefers temporal things to eternal? Who (allowing that absurd, impossible supposition, that wickedness is happiness: a supposition utterly contrary to all reason, as well as to matter of fact,) prefers the happiness of a year, say a thousand years, to the

happiness of eternity? In comparison of which, a thousand ages are infinitely less than a year, a day, a moment, is to a thousand years! Especially when we take this into the consideration, (which should never be forgotten,) that refusing a happy eternity implies the choosing of a miserable eternity. For there is not, cannot be any medium, between everlasting joy and everlasting pain. It is a vain thought which some have entertained, that death will put an end to the soul as well as the body. It will put an end to neither the one nor the other; it will only alter the manner of their existence. But when the body "returns to the dust as it was, the spirit will return to God that gave it." Therefore, at the moment of death, it must be unspeakably happy or unspeakably miserable. And this misery will never end.

"Never! Where sinks the soul at that dread sound? Into a gulf how dark, and how profound!"

How often would he, who had made the wretched choice, wish for the death both of his soul and body? Is it not possible he might pray in some such manner as Dr. Young supposes,

"When I have writh'd ten thousand years in fire;

Ten thousand thousand, let me then expire!"

16. Yet this unspeakable folly, this unutterable madness, of preferring present things to eternal, is the disease of every man born into the world, while in his natural state. For such is the constitution of our nature, that as the eye sees only such a portion of space at once, so the mind sees only such a portion of time at once. And as all the space that lies beyond this is invisible to the eye, so all the time which lies beyond that compass, is invisible to the mind. So that we do not perceive either the space or the time which is at a distance from us. The eye sees distinctly the space that is near it, with the objects which it contains. like manner, the mind sees distinctly those objects which are within such a distance of time. The eye does not see the beauties of China. They are at too great a distance.

In

« EdellinenJatka »