Sivut kuvina
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

1. No certiorari for diminution of the record shall be hereafter awarded, in any cause, unless a motion therefor shall be made in writing, and the facts on which the same is founded shall, if not admitted by the other party, be verified by affidavit. And all motions for such certiorari shall be made at the first term of the entry of the cause; otherwise the same shall not be granted, unless upon special cause shown to the Court, accounting satisfactorily for the delay.

2. In all cases of equity and admiralty jurisdiction heard in this Court, no objection shall hereafter be allowed to be taken to the admissibility of any deposition, deed, grant, or other exhibit found in the record, as evidence, unless objection was taken thereto in the Court below, and entered of record; but the same shall otherwise be deemed to have been admitted by consent.

3. On Saturday of each week during the sitting of the Court, motions, in cases not required by the rules of Court to be put upon the docket, shall be entitled to preference, if such motions shall be made before the Court shall have entered upon the hearing of a cause upon the docket.

TABLE

OF

THE NAMES OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

The Apollon, [INSTANCE COURT.]

B.

Bank of Columbia, (Renner v.) [PROMISSORY NOTE. EVI-
DENCE. PLEADING.]

A.

362

581

Bank of Washington, (McGruder v.) [PROMISSORY NOTE.]
Bank of the United States, (Osborn v.) [CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW. CHANCERY.]

598

738

Bank of the United States v. Planters' Bank of Georgia, [CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.]

Burr, (Ex parte) [PRACTICE.]

[ocr errors]

Brodie, Catlett v.) [PRACTICE.]
Baits v. Peters, [EXTINGUISHMENT.]

904

529

553

556

[blocks in formation]

Doddridge v. Thompson, [LOCAL LAW.]

Dorr, (Sebree v.) [LOCAL LAW. PROMISSORY NOTE.]
Danforth v. Wear, [LOCAL LAW.]

E.

The Emily and the Caroline, [INSTANCE COURT. SLAVE

TRADE ACTS.]

[ocr errors]

Edwards, (Hugl. v.) [CHANCERY. MORTGAGE.]

Ex parte Burr, [PRA TICE.]

Ex parte Wood, [PATENT. PRACTICE.]

469

558

673

F.

The Fanny [PRIZE. ]

G.

Gibbons v. Ogden, [CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.]

381

489

529

603

658

1

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

The Monte Allegre, [PRIZE. JUDICIAL SALE.]
Mollan v. Torrance, [PRACTICE. JURISDICTION.]
M'Gruder v. Bank of Washington, [PROMISSORY NOTE.]
M'Iver, (Smith v.) [CHANCERY. JURISDICTION.].
Mason, (Taylor v.) [DEVISE.]

[ocr errors]

M'Creery v. Somerville, [LOCAL LAW. CONSTRUCTION OF

[merged small][ocr errors]

489

526

241

565

720

515

573

616

537

598

532

325

354

The Merino et al. [INSTANCE COURT. SLAVE TRADE ACTS.} 391 The Margaret alias Carlos Fernanda, [INSTANCE COURT.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Osborn v. Bank of the United States, [CONSTITUTIONal Law.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

421

445

502

565

630

680

1

738

527

556

573

579

[CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.]

R.

Riggs v. Tayloe, [EVIDENCE.]

904

483

Robertson, (Peyton v.) [JURISDICTION.]

Renner. Bank of Columbia, [PROMISSORY NOTE. EVI

527

DENCE. PLEADING.] .

581

S.

Sebree v. Dorr, [LOCAL LAW. PROMISSORY NOTE.]

558

[merged small][ocr errors]

Planters' Bank of Georgia, (Bank of the United States v.)

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Taylor v. Mason, [DEVISE.]

Tea, (200 chests of,) [INSTANCE COURT.]

Thompson, (Doddridge v.) [LOCAL LAW.]

Tayloe, (Riggs, v.) [EVIDENCE.]

Torrance, (Mollan v.) [PRACTICE. JURISDICTION.]

325

430

469

[ocr errors]

483

537.

Turner, (Walker v.) [LOCAL LAW.]

541

U.

United States v. Perez, (PRACTICE.]

[ocr errors]

579

United States, (Walton v.) [CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTE.]
United States v. Kirkpatrick, [SURETY.]

651

720

[blocks in formation]

Wattles, (M'Iver v.) [PRACTICE.]

650

Walton v. United States, (CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTE.

PRACTICE.]

651

Wear, (Danforth v.) (LOCAL LAW.]

[ocr errors][merged small]

ANDUM.

The case of Ogden v. Saunders, and the causes involving the question of the validity of the State bankrupt or insolvent laws, which were argued at the present term, by Mr. Clay, Mr. D. B. Ogden, and Mr. Haines, for the validity, and by Mr. Webster and Mr. Wheaton, against it, were continued to the next term, for advisement. It is the intention of the Editor to publish a separate account of these cases, on the rising of the Court at the next term, and in anticipation of the annual publication of the Reports.

.

It is also his intention to commence with the next term a new series of the Reports, and to reduce the size of the type, so as to give room for the matter produced by the increased business of the Court, without swelling the volume to an inconvenient bulk.

« EdellinenJatka »