« EdellinenJatka »
PRO P H E CI E S,
WHICH ARE NOT YET ACCOMPLISHED.
Observations on their Dates.
CHRONOLOGY is juftly reckoned one of U the eyes of history. Prophecy is the history of events, previous to their accomplishment; and therefore has its chronological calendar an. nexed. The time of the most remarkable events is fixed; and this has a twofold effect, in establishing the faith and patience of the people of
God. Before the accomplishment, they are not to doubt of the completion, nor be impatient in waiting for it, because the time appointed is not yet come. Of every fcripture-prophecy it may be said, “ The vision is for an appointed time, “ at the end it shall speak, and not lie.” After the accomplishment, the time being found to coincide with the circumstances foretold, will afford additional evidence to the rational mind of the divine original of the prophecy.
But though prophecy has its calendar, difficulties will occur in the application of it. Numbers are used sometimes in a mystic sense, sometimes in their ordinary meaning. The circumstances of any event predicted may go a great way to discover in what sense they are to be received; but the event itself, when accomplished, can alone determine their meaning with absolute certainty. If we did know with absolute certainty the precise meaning, whether mystic or literal, of each number used in prophetic description, such knowledge would enable us to discover the relative situation of events ; that is, the difference of time betwixt one.event and another ; yet still it would be difficult to adjust them to the ordinary computation of time; that is, to shew in what particular year of the Chriftian æra, this or that event shall be accom
plished!. But if any one event in the series can be with certainty reduced to the years of the common computation, so may every other.
:: Time in which the Reign of Antichrist began.
One event is so important, that it engrosses a great part of the prophecies which regard the latter days. I mean the kingdom of Antichrist; and many of the calculations used in them are dated from the commencement of his reign. Though it is no longer a question with Protestants who have directed their attention to the prophecies, who Antichrift is, yet various opinions are still held with respect to the beginning of his kingdom
Some date the beginning of Antichrist's kingdom from the Bishop of Rome's apostacy in articles of faith; others from his affuming the title of Oecumenical Patriarch; but others, and I think with greater propriety, from the period
:: Lorii in (1) From these observations, the candid reader will see that the principles laid down respecting the dates of events, are not to be considered as dogmatical affertions, but as probable conjectures. I do not imagine that the dates are equally clear with the events.
in which he attained the temporal sovereignty. My reasons for adopting this opinion, are these:
1. The little horn representing Antichrist is said to continue " a time and times, and the di“ viding of time,” (Dan. vii. 25.); that is, three years and a half, as it is explained Rev. xii. 6.-14. Now, whether these years be taken for natural or prophetic years, they fignify the duration of a temporal kingdom or civil dominion; for the ten horns mentioned in the same représentation, certainly fignify kingdoms, or distinct territories of the Roman empire; the fitness of the emblem therefore requires that the little horn be a kingdom or distinct territory of the fame empire. Again it is by understanding it thus, that we fearn why it is called a little horn, while it had“ a mouth that spoke great things." În point of territory, the Bishop of Rome is but a petty prince ; but the time has been, when he caused every crowned head in Europe to tremble on his throne. Farther, three horns were pluck. ed up by the roots, to make room for the little horn. These, according to the best interpreters, are the Dutchy of Rome, the Exarchate of Ra. venna, and the kingdom of the Lombards. Now these were overturned to establish the pope's temporal dominion. All the circumftan. çes of the description, therefore, shew that An
tichrift is termed a horn, on account of his temporal sovereignty; that the continuance of the little horn is, in other words, the duration of that sovereignty; which period must commencé with the time in which the Bishop of Rome acquired it, and not before.
2. I argue from Revelation xiii. 5. where it is said of Antichrist, that power was given “ him to continue forty and two months." Forty-two months are precisely three years and à half. But who is said to continue for that time? You will find from the context, it is the seventh or last head of the beast, representing the Roman empire. : Now the Bishop of Rome could not, with striet propriety, be termed the head of the Roman empire, while Rome and its territory were subject to any other prince, ei. ther the Emperor, Exarch, King of the Goths or Lombards; during all that period, the Bishop of Rome was but second in authority; but when he stept into the throne of the Cæfars, he may be justly reckoned the head of the empire. It is from that period, therefore, the prophecy be. gins to reckon the forty-two months of his reign.
3. The time of Antichrift's appearance is fixe ed, Revelation xiii. 18. “ Herein is wisdom.