Mitä ihmiset sanovat - Kirjoita arvostelu
Yhtään arvostelua ei löytynyt.
Muita painoksia - Näytä kaikki
action agreement alleged amount answer appears application appointed attorney authority bank bonds brought cause charge Cincinnati cited claim Cleveland Code Common Pleas condition consideration constitution construction contract corporation council counsel damages decision deed defendant determine duty effect election error evidence exercise fact filed finding follows further give given granted ground Hamilton Common Pleas held hold injury Insurance interest issue judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury land language legislature liable limited matter means motion municipal N. E. Rep natural necessary officer Ohio St operation opinion owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff police premises presented proceedings proper purchase question railroad Railway reason receiver record reference relator rendered rule statute street suit Supreme Court term thereof tion trial trust
Sivu 313 - What these fundamental principles are, it would perhaps be more tedious than difficult to enumerate. They may, however, be all comprehended under the following general heads : protection by the government; the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the right to acquire and possess property of every kind, and to pursue and obtain happiness and safety ; subject nevertheless to such restraints as the government may justly prescribe for the general good of the whole.
Sivu 63 - The rule of the common law, that statutes in derogation thereof are to be strictly construed, has no application to this code. The code establishes the law of this state respecting the subjects to which it relates, and its provisions and all proceedings under it are to be liberally construed, with a view to effect its objects and to promote justice.
Sivu 115 - A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention...
Sivu 420 - In all such particulars the employer and the employee have equality of right, and any legislation that disturbs that equality is an arbitrary interference with the liberty of contract which no government can legally justify in a free land.
Sivu 115 - Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both ; and that where the will of the legislature, declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people, declared in the Constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental.
Sivu 414 - All men are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and pursuing and obtaining safety- and happiness.
Sivu 220 - ... think proportioned to the pecuniary injury resulting from such death, to the persons respectively for whose benefit such action shall be brought.
Sivu 219 - ... expired, the plaintiff, or, if he die and the cause of action survive, his representatives, may commence a new action within one year after such reversal or failure.