« EdellinenJatka »
was led to confess that he could neither discover by study, nor prayer, nor any process of reasoning, how the doctrine of original sin could be defended on the supposition of the creation of souls.” The texts which are usually advanced, Eccles. xii. 7. Isai. lvii. 16. Zech. xii. 1. certainly indicate that nobler origin of the soul implied in its being breathed from the mouth of God; but they no more prove that each soul is severally and immediately created by the Deity, than certain other texts, which might be quoted, prove that each individual body is formed in the womb by the immediate hand of God.” Job x. 8–10. thine hands have made me.....hast not thou poured me out as milk? Psal. xxxiii. 15. he fashioneth their hearts alike. Job xxxi. 15. did not he that made me in the womb make him 2 Isai. xliv. 24, thus saith Jehovah....he that formed thee from the womb. Acts xvii. 26. he hath made of one blood all nations of men. We are not to infer from these passages, that natural causes do not contribute their ordinary efficacy for the propagation of the body; nor on the other hand that the soul is not received by tra
* “We cannot deny but that besides Origen, several others of the ancient fathers before the fifth council seem either to have espoused the pre-existence of souls, or at least to have had a favour and kindness for it; insomuch that St. Augustine himself is sometimes staggering in this point, and thinks it to be a great secret whether men's souls existed before their generations or no, and somewhere concludes it to be a matter of indifferency, wherein every one may have his liberty of opinion either way without offence." Cudworth's Intellectual System, chap. v. ‘Hujus igitur damnationis in parvulis causam requiro, quia neque animarum, si novae fiunt singulis singulae, video esse ullum in illa aetate peccatum, nec a Deo damnari aliquam credo quam videt nullum habere peccatum.” Augustinus De Origine anima, &c. ad Hieron. ‘Quaere ubi, vel unde, vel quando coeperint [animae] damnationis meritum habere, si novae sunt, ita sane ut Deum non facias, nec aliquam naturam, quam non condidit Deus, vel peccati earum vel innocentum damnationis auctorem. Et si inveneris quod te quaerere admonui, quod ipse adhuc, fateor, non inveni, defende quantum potes, atque assere animam infantium ejusmodi esse novitatem, ut nulla propagatione ducantur; et nobiscum quod inveneris fraterna dilectione communica.’ Augustinus Ep. 157. (190. Edit. Benedict.) ad Optatum.
* * Sunt quaedam scripturae loca, quae id asserere videntur, ut Job. xxxiii. 4. Eccles. xii. 9. Zach. xii. 4. Respondeo, ex eo quod Jobus ait, spiraculum Omnipotentis vitam sili indidisse, non magis sequi id factum esse immediate a Deo, quam ex eo quod idem dicit, nonne sicut
lac mulsisti me, &c. Job. x. 8, colligi legitime potest corpora nostra a parentibus non gigni, sed immediate a Deo ipso formari. Curcell. Institutio. III. 10. 9.
duction from the father, because at the time of death it again betakes itself to different elements than the body, in conformity with its own
With regard to the passage, Heb. xii. 9. where the fathers of the flesh are opposed to the Father of spirits, I answer, that it is to be understood in a theological, not in a physical sense, as if the father of the body were opposed to the father of the soul; for flesh is taken neither in this passage, nor probably any where else, for the body without the soul; nor the father of spirits for the father of the soul, in respect of the work of generation; but the father of the flesh here means nothing else than the earthly or natural father, whose offspring are begotten in sin; the father of spirits is either the heavenly father, who in the beginning created all spirits, angels as well as the human race, or the spiritual father, who bestows a second birth on the faithful; according to John iii. 6. that which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. The argument, too, will proceed better, if the whole be understood as referring to edification and correction, not to generation; for the point in question is not, from what source each individual originated, or what part of him thence originated, but who had Proved most successful in the employment of chastisement and instruction. By parity of reasoning, the apostle might exhort the converts to bear with his rebuke, on the ground that he was their spiritual father. God indeed is as truly the father of the flesh as of the spirits of flesh, Numb. xvi. 22. but this is not the sense intended here, and all arguments are weak which are deduced from passages of Scripture originally relating to a different subject.
With regard to the soul of Christ, it will be sufficient to answer that its generation was supernatural, and therefore cannot be cited as an argument in the discussion of this controversy. Nevertheless, even he is called the seed of the woman, the seed of David according to the flesh; that is, undoubtedly, according to his human nature.
There seems therefore no reason, why the soul of man should be made an exception to the general law of creation. For, as has been shown before, God breathed the breath of life into the other living beings, and blended it so intimately with matter, that the propagation and production of the human form were analogous to those of other forms, and the proper effect of that power which had been communicated to matter by the Deity.
Man being formed after the image of God, it followed as a necessary consequence that he should be endued with natural wisdom, holiness, and righteousness. Gen. i. 27, 31. ii. 25. Eccles. vii. 29. Eph. iv. 24. Col. iii. 10. 2 Cor. iii. 18. Certainly without extraordinary wisdom he could not have given names to the whole animal creation with such sudden intelligence, Gen. ii. 20."
* In this illustration the chief stress is laid upon the suddenness with which Adam was enabled to give appropriate names to the brute creation, as it passed in review before him. Milton has two other allusions to this event, and the same circumstance is marked as the prominent feature of the case in both passages. There is nothing in the scriptural narration to suggest the particular idea, or the coincidence would have been less remarkable.
I nam'd them as they pass'd, and understood
“But Adam, who had the wisdom given him to know all creatures, and to name them according to their properties, no doubt but had the gift to discern perfectly that which concerned him much more, and to apprehend at first sight the true fitness of that consort which God provided him.’ Tetrachordon. Prose Works, II. 133.
OF THE PROVIDENCE OF GoD, OR OF HIS
GENERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNIVERSE.
THE remaining species of God's external efficiency, is his Gover NMENT OF THE WHOLE CREATION.
This government is either GENERAL or sPECIAL.
His GENERAL Gover NMENT is that whereby GoD THE FATHER REGARDS, PRESERVES, AND GOVERNS THE WHOLE OF CREATION WITH
INFINITE WISDOM AND HOLINESS ACCORDING TO THE CONDITIONS OF HIS DECREE.
GoD THE FATHER. Neh. ix. 6. thou, even thou, art Jehovah alone... thou hast made, and thou preservest them all. To this truth Christ himself bears witness everywhere. Matt. v. 45. that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven; for he maketh his sun to rise.... and sendeth rain, &c. vi. 4. thy Father which seeth in secret. v. 8. your Father knoweth. v. 13. thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory. v. 26. your heavenly Father feedeth them. v. 32. your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. vii. 11. your Father which is in heaven shall give good things unto them that ask him. x. 29. one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father. Acts i. 7, the times and the seasons which the Father hath put in his own power. Eph. i. 11. according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will. James i. 17. every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights. Even as regards the Son himself. Acts iv. 27. against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed......for to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done. The preservation of the universe is attributed to the Son also, but in what sense, and on what grounds, may be seen in the fifth chapter, on the Son of God. Col. i. 17. by him all things consist, but both the preceding and following verses explain on what account; namely, because the Father, v. 13. hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son, and because, v. 19. it pleased the Father that in him should all Julness dwell. Heb. i. 3. upholding all things by the word of his power, namely, because, v. 2. the Father hath appointed him heir of all things. Further, it will appear on an examination of the passage, that the original ought to be translated, not of his own power,” but of his, namely, the Father's, of whose person he was the express image: and the right reading in the Greek is avros, not avros, since 3' eavros, immediately follows, as if put expressly for the sake of distinction. Lastly, Christ testifies of himself, Matt. xxviii. 18. all power is given unto me in heaven and in earth; and to the same effect in many other places.
REGARDs. Job xxxi. 4. doth not he count all my steps ? 2 Chron. xvi. 9. the eyes of Jehovah run to and fro throughout the whole earth. Psal. xxxiii. 15, he fashioneth their hearts alike; he considereth all their works. Jer. xxxii. 19. thine eyes are open upon all the ways of the sons of men. Hos. ii. 21. I will hear the heavens.
* In allusion to the versions of Beza and Tremellius, who translate the clause, sustineatgue omnia verbo potentiae suae, or verbo illo suo potente, and, sustinet omnia virtute verbi sui. Mill reads aurou, without noticing the other reading, nor have I remarked that Waterland, who often quotes and argues upon the passage, takes any notice of the variation. It is however mentioned by Doddridge; and Wetstein, who reads aurov, has the following note: ‘avrov, ut ad Patrem referatur. Christus verbo potentiae paternae cuncta fert. Editio Erasmi, Colinaei.’ To these two names Archbishop Newcome has added that of Bengelius, in the copy of Wetstein's New Testament which formerly belonged to that prelate, and which is enriched with several annotations in his hand-writing.